Froth flotation of refuse coal fines and process optimization using 2D surface plots

Abstract

Refuse coal fines of size <500 µm was collected from a metallurgical coal preparation plant located in the eastern coalfield region of India. The coal was beneficiated using froth flotation technique to recover clean coal with ash content of about 20% with the highest possible yield. Diesel oil as collector and pine oil as frother were used. Box-Behnken statistical design was followed for analyzing the performance at varying pulp density, collector and frother dosage. Results were discussed using 2D surface plots. Response function predictions determined by the regression analysis show coefficient of correlation (R²) for yield and the ash content as 0.72 and 0.86, respectively. The highest yield of 45.79% is obtained at pulp density 10%, collector dose 2 kg/t and frother dose 1.5 kg/t. The lowest ash content of 18.9% is obtained at pulp density 10%, collector dose 1 kg/t and frother dose 1 kg/t.

Keywords

refuse coal / froth flotation / Box-Behnken / 2D RSM

References

[1] CebeciY, SönmezI. Application of the Box-Wilson experimental design method for the spherical oil agglomeration of coal [J]. Fuel, 2006, 85: 289-297

[2] GiangangF, KaidaC, WangH, ChaoG, WeiL. Recovering molybdenite from ultrafine waste tailings by oil agglomerate flotation [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2012, 39: 133-139

[3] KumarS, BhattacharyaS, MandreN R. Characterization and flocculation studies of fine coal tailings [J]. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2014, 114: 945-949

[4] DeyS, BhattacharyyaK K. Split and collectorless flotation to medium coking coal fines for multi-product zero waste concept [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 88: 585-590

[5] BhattacharyaS, RaiB, RunkanaV. Processing of coal fines–The challenges we face in India [C]// IV Asian Particle Technology Symposium. New Delhi, APT, 20095-9

[6] WillsB A, Napier-MunnT. An introduction to the practical aspects of ore treatment and mineral recovery [M]// Mineral Processing Technology. Seventh edition., 2006267-269

[7] JaiswalS, TripathyS K, BanerjeeP K. An overview of reverse flotation process for coal [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2015, 134: 97-110

[8] MilenaK, GligoricZ. Multi-criteria decision making for collector selection in the flotation of lead–zinc sulfide ore [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2015, 74: 142-149

[9] SilvestreM O, PereiraC A, GaleryR, PeresA E C. Dispersion effect on a lead–zinc sulphide ore flotation [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2009, 22: 752-758

[10] RibeiroR C C, CorreiaJ C G, MonteM B M. Cashew gum: A new depressor for limestone in the phosphate minerals flotation [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2003, 16: 873-875

[11] BarrazaJ, GuerreroJ, PiñeresJ. Flotation of a refuse tailing fine coal slurry [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 106: 498-500

[12] LiM, WoodC J, DavisJ J. A study of coal washing spirals [J]. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 1993, 12(1/2/3/4): 117-131

[13] AslanN, CebeciY. Application of Box–Behnken design and response surface methodology for modeling of some Turkish coals [J]. Fuel, 2007, 86: 90-97

[14] SonmezI, CebeciY, SenolD. Optimization of coal flocculation with an anionic flocculant using a Box-Wilson statistical design method [J]. Physicochemical Problems in Mineral Processing, 2014, 50(2): 811-822

[15] UcbeyiayH. Hydrophobic flocculation and Box–Wilson experimental design for beneficiating fine coal [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 106: 1-8

[16] QuJ, TaoX, TangL, XuN, HeH. Flotation characteristics and particle size distribution of micro-fine low rank coal [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 102: 159-166