Saturation influence of control voltage on maglev stationary self-excited vibration

Abstract

This work addresses the saturation influence of control voltage on the occurring of self-excited vibration of maglev vehicle-bridge interaction system, which greatly degrades the stability of the levitation control, decreases the ride comfort, and restricts the cost of the whole system. Firstly, the interaction model of vehicle-bridge system is developed. Based on the interaction model, the relationship between the control voltage and vibration frequency is solved. Then, the variation of the effective direct component and fundamental harmonic are discussed. Furthermore, from the perspective of energy transmission between the levitation system and bridge, the principle underlying the self-excited vibration is explored, and the influence on the stability is discussed. Finally, in terms of the variation of the characteristic roots, the influence is analyzed further and some conclusions are obtained. This study provides a theoretical guidance for mastering the self-excited vibration problems.

Keywords

maglev / levitation / saturation / self-excited vibration

References

[1] ElvinN G, ElvinA A A. An experimentally validated electromagnetic energy harvester [J].. J Sound Vib, 2011, 330(5): 2314-2324

[2] ZhouD F, HansenC H, LiJ. Suppression of maglev vehicle-girder self-excited vibration using a virtual tuned mass damper [J].. J Sound Vib, 2011, 330(5): 883-901

[3] WaiR J, LeeJ D, ChuangK L. Real-time PID control strategy for maglev transportation system via particle swarm optimization [J].. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2011, 58(2): 629-646

[4] ZhouD F, HansenC H, LiJ. Review of coupled vibration problems in EMS maglev vehicle [J].. J Vib Acoust, 2010, 15(1): 10-23

[5] AlbertT E, OleszczukG, HanasogeA M. Stable levitation control of magnetically suspended vehicles with structural flexibility [C]//. Proceedings of the 2008 American Control Conference, 20084035-4040

[6] ZouD S, SheL H, ZhangZ Q, ZhouF M. Maglev vehicle and guideway coupling vibration analysis [J].. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2010, 38(9): 2071-2075

[7] LiL, MengG. The analysis of coupling vibration between maglev vehicle and steel bridge [J].. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2006, 25(6): 46-75

[8] WangH P, LiJ, ZhangK. Vibration analysis of the maglev guideway with the moving load [J].. J Sound Vib, 2007, 305(4): 621-640

[9] WangH P, LiJ, ZhangK. Sup-resonant response of a nonautonomous maglev system with delayed acceleration feedback control [J].. IEEE Trans Magn, 2008, 44(10): 2338-2350

[10] LiX L, ZhangL L, ZhangZ Z, SheL H, HuangL H. Bifurcation control for maglev system with two state feedback delays [C]//. Proceeding of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, 2008244-247

[11] ZhangZ Z, ZhangL L. Hopf bifurcation of time-delayed feedback control for maglev system with flexible guideway [J].. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2013, 219(11): 6106-6112

[12] LiY G, ZhangD, ChengH. The design and simulation of an adaptive maglev control algorithm based on oscillation observation [C]//. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Magnetically Levitated Systems and Linear Drives, 2004984-990

[13] KongE, SongJ S, KangB B. Dynamic response and robust control of coupled maglev vehicle and guideway system [J].. J Sound Vib, 2011, 330(25): 6237-6253

[14] LiY G, ChangW S. Cascade control of an EMS maglev vehicle’s levitation control system [J].. Acta Automatica Sinica, 1999, 25(2): 247-251

[15] GuzmanH. Current loops in a magnetic levitation system [J].. Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 2004, 5(5): 1275-1283