Coordinated and uncoordinated design of LFO damping controllers with IPFC and PSS using ICA and SFLA

Mahdi Toupchi Khosroshahi , Farhad Mohajel Kazemi , Mohammad Reza Jannati Oskuee , Sajad Najafi-Ravadanegh

Journal of Central South University ›› 2015, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (9) : 3418 -3426.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2015, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (9) : 3418 -3426. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-015-2882-2
Article

Coordinated and uncoordinated design of LFO damping controllers with IPFC and PSS using ICA and SFLA

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

A single machine-infinite-bus (SMIB) system including the interline power flow controllers (IPFCs) and the power system stabilizer (PSS) controller is addressed. The linearized system model is considered for investigating the interactions among IPFC and PSS controllers. To improve the stability of whole system again different disturbances, a lead-lag controller is considered to produce supplementary signal. The proposed supplementary controller is implemented to improve the damping of the power system low frequency oscillations (LFOs). Imperialist optimization algorithm (ICA) and shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) are implemented to search for optimal supplementary controllers and PSS parameters. Moreover, singular value decomposition (SVD) method is utilized to select the most effective damping control signal of IPFC lead-lag controllers. To evaluate the system performance, different operating conditions are considered. Reponses of system in five modes including uncoordinated and coordinated modes of IPFC and PSS using ICA and SFLA are studied and compared. Considering the results, response of system without controller shows the highest overshoot and the longest settling time for rotor angel at the different operating conditions. In this mode of system, rotor speed has the highest overshoot. Rotor angel in the system with only PSS includes lower overshoot and oscillation than system without controller. When PSS is only implemented, rotor speed deviation has the longest settling time. Rotor speed deviation in the uncoordinated mode of IPFC and PSS shows lower overshoot than system with only PSS and without controller. It is noticeable that in this mode, rotor angel has higher overshoot than system with only PSS. The superiority of the suggested ICA-based coordinated controllers is obvious compared with SFLA-based coordinated controllers and other system modes. Responses of coordinated PSS and IPFC SFLA-based supplementary controllers include higher peak amplitude and longer settling time compared with coordinated IPFC and PSS ICA-based controllers. This comparison shows that overshoots, undershoots and the settling times are reduced considerably in coordinated mode of IPFC based controller and PSS using ICA. Analysis of the system performance shows that the proposed method has excellent response to different faults in power system.

Keywords

interline power flow controller (IPFC) / controller / imperialist competitive optimization algorithm / power system stabilizer (PSS)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mahdi Toupchi Khosroshahi, Farhad Mohajel Kazemi, Mohammad Reza Jannati Oskuee, Sajad Najafi-Ravadanegh. Coordinated and uncoordinated design of LFO damping controllers with IPFC and PSS using ICA and SFLA. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(9): 3418-3426 DOI:10.1007/s11771-015-2882-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

KundurPPower system stability and control [M], 1994New YorkMcGraw-Hill

[2]

ZhangX DModern signal processing [M], 1995BeijingTsinghua University Press

[3]

PipelzadehY, ChaudhuriB, GreenT C. Control coordination within a VSC HVDC link for power oscillation damping: A robust decentralized approach using homotopy [J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2013, 21(4): 1270-1279

[4]

DuW, WangH F, CaoJ, XiaoL Y. Robustness of an energy storage system-based stabilizer to suppress inter-area oscillations in a multi-machine power system [J]. Generation, Transmission & Distribution, IET, 2012, 6(4): 339-351

[5]

SimfukweD, PalB C. Robust and low order power oscillation damper design through polynomial control [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(2): 1599-1608

[6]

MakiO, SeppanenJ, HaarlaL, ZengerK. Analysis of a centralized control strategy in mitigating inter-area power oscillations [C]. Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe), 20141-6

[7]

SambariyaD K, PrasadRAJENDRA. Robust power system stabilizer design for single machine infinite bus system with different membership functions for fuzzy logic controller [C]. IEEE 7th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO), 201313-19

[8]

WangH F. Selection of robust installing locations and feedback signals of FACTS-based stabilizers in multi-machine power systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(2): 569-574

[9]

SaberianA, FarzanP, NejadM F, HizamH. Role of FACTS devices in improving penetration of renewable energy [C]. IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), 2013432-437

[10]

HINGORAMI N G, GYUGYI L. Understanding FACTS: Concepts and technology of flexible AC transmission system [M]. New York: IEEE Press, 2000: 425–429.

[11]

GyugyiL, SenK K, SchauderC D. The interline power flow controller concept: A new approach to power flow management in transmission systems [J]. IEEE Trans on Power Delivery, 1999, 14(3): 1115-1123

[12]

RezaeiN, KalantarM, ShayanfarH A, AlipouriY, SafariA. Optimal IPFC signal selection and damping controller design using a novel current injection model in a multi-machine power system [J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2013, 44(1): 461-470

[13]

NathiyaK, ParimalasundarEA paper about power flow control using IPFC in transmission lines [C], 20131-6

[14]

ParimiA M, SahooN C, ElamvazuthiI, SaadNTransient stability enhancement and power flow control in a multi-machine power system using interline power flow controller [C], 20111-6

[15]

BanaeiM R, KamiAInterline power flow controller based damping controllers for damping low frequency oscillations [C], 20091-6

[16]

ChenJ, LieT T, VilathgamuwaD MDesign of interline power flow controller [C], 2002SevilleIEEE1-5

[17]

KeD P, ChungC Y. An inter-area mode oriented pole-shifting method with coordination of control efforts for robust tuning of power oscillation damping controllers [J]. IEEE Trans Power System, 2012, 27(3): 1422-1432

[18]

AbidoM A. Pole placement technique for PSS and TCSC-based stabilizer design using simulated annealing [J]. Electric Power System Research, 2000, 22(8): 543-554

[19]

ShahB J, PillaiG N, AgarwalPPower oscillation damping in multi-machine power system using PSSs considering various load models [C], 20131-6

[20]

CaiL J, ErlichI. Simultaneous coordinated tuning of PSS and FACTS damping controller in a large power system [J]. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2005, 20(1): 294-300

[21]

VikhramG Y R, LathaS. Robust shunt FACTS controller design for power system damping improvement [J]. International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 2013, 8(2): 792-801

[22]

AmbafiJ G, NwohuM N, OhizeH O, TolaO J. Performance evaluation of PSS and ST A TCOM on oscillation damping of a North Central power network of Nigeria grid system [J]. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2012, 2(2): 209-219

[23]

HameedS, GargP, VarshneyS KPower system stability enhancement with genetically optimized SVC controller [C], 2013202-207

[24]

ShahgholianG, MovahediA, FaizJ. Coordinated design of TCSC and PSS controllers using VURPSO and genetic algorithms for multi-machine power system stability [J]. Springer International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2015, 13(2): 398-409

[25]

SambariyaD K, PrasadRAJENDRARobust power system stabilizer design for single machine infinite bus system with different membership functions for fuzzy logic controller [C], 201313-19

[26]

FarahaniM A. Multi-objective power system stabilizer [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(3): 2700-2707

[27]

HassanH L, MoghavvemiM, AlmuribH A F, MuttaqiK M, GanapathyV G. Optimization of power system stabilizers using participation factor and genetic algorithm [J]. Elsevier International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2014, 55: 668-679

[28]

JaleelJ A, NasarA, PreethyKPerformance evaluation of GA and GL based PSS of a multi-machine system [C], 2013461-466

[29]

AbidoM A, Abdel-MagidY L. A genetic-based power system stabilizer [J]. Electric Machines and Power Systems, 1998, 26(6): 559-571

[30]

ShayeghiH, ShayanfarH A, JalilzadehS, SafariA. Multi-machine power system stabilizers design using chaotic optimization algorithm [J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2010, 51: 1572-1580

[31]

BanaeiM R, KamiA. Interline power flow controller (IPFC) based damping recurrent neural network controllers for enhancing stability [J]. Elsevier Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52: 2629-2636

[32]

ATASHPAZ-GARGARI E A, LUCAS C. Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition [M]. Singapore, 2007: 4661–4667.

[33]

AfzalanE, TaghikhaniM A, SedighzadehM. optimal placement and sizing of DG in radial distribution networks using SFLA [J]. International Journal of Energy Engineering, 2012, 2(3): 73-77

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

99

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/