Selection of organic Rankine cycle working fluid based on unit-heat-exchange-area net power

Abstract

To improve energy conversion efficiency, optimization of the working fluids in organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) was explored in the range of low-temperature heat sources. The concept of unit-heat-exchange-area (UHEA) net power, embodying the cost/performance ratio of an ORC system, was proposed as a new indicator to judge the suitability of ORC working fluids on a given condition. The heat exchange area was computed by an improved evaporator model without fixing the minimum temperature difference between working fluid and hot fluid, and the flow pattern transition during heat exchange was also taken into account. The maximum UHEA net powers obtained show that dry organic fluids are more suitable for ORCs than wet organic fluids to recover low-temperature heat. The organic fluid 1-butene is recommended if the inlet temperature of hot fluid is 353.15–363.15 K or 443.15–453.15 K, heptane is more suitable at 373.15–423.15 K, and R245ca is a good option at 483.15–503.15 K.

Keywords

organic Rankine cycle (ORC) / working fluid selection / net power / heat exchange area

References

[1] SchusterA, KarellasS, AumannR. Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical organic Rankine cycles [J]. Energy, 2010, 35(2): 1033-1039

[2] XiaoS, WuS-y, ZhengD-sheng. Slag-washing water of blast furnace power station with supercritical organic rankine cycle [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(3): 737-741

[3] WangZ-q, ZhouN-j, ZhangJ-q, GuoJ, WangX-yuan. Parametric optimization and performance comparison of organic Rankine cycle with simulated annealing algorithm [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(9): 2584-2590

[4] HungT C, ShaiT Y, WangS K. A review of organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat [J]. Energy, 1997, 22(7): 661-667

[5] LiuB T, ChienK H, WangC C. Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery [J]. Energy, 2004, 29(8): 1207-1217

[6] Borsukiewicz-gozdurA, NowakW. Maximising the working fluid flow as a way of increasing power output of geothermal power plant [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2007, 27(11): 2074-2078

[7] KanogluM, BolatturkA. Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy [J]. Renewable Energy, 2008, 33(11): 2366-2374

[8] ClementeS, MicheliD, ReiniM, TaccaniR. Bottoming organic Rankine cycle for a small scale gas turbine: A comparison of different solutions [J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 106(2): 355-364

[9] TchancheB F, PapadakisG, LambrinosG, FrangoudakisA. Fluid selection for a low-temperature solar organic Rankine cycle [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(11/12): 2468-2476

[10] LiuB, RiviereP, CoqueletC, GicquelR, DavidF. Investigation of a two stage Rankine cycle for electric power plants [J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 100(12): 285-294

[11] ZhuQ-d, SunZ-q, ZhouJ-min. Performance analysis of organic Rankine cycles using different working fluids [J]. Thermal Science, 2015, 19(1): 179-191

[12] MagoP J, ChamraL M, SrinivasanK, SomayajiC. An examination of regenerative organic Rankine cycles using dry fluids [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 28(8/9): 998-1007

[13] HeberleF, BruggemannD. Exergy based fluid selection for a geothermal organic Rankine cycle for combined heat and power generation [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(11): 1326-1332

[14] DigenovaK J, BotrosB B, BrissonJ G. Method for customizing an organic Rankine cycle to a complex heat source for efficient energy conversion, demonstrated on a Fischer Tropsch plant [J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 102(2): 746-754

[15] MacianV, SerranoJ R, DolzV, SanchezJ. Methodology to design a bottoming Rankine cycle as a waste energy recovering system in vehicles: Study in a HDD engine [J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 104(4): 758-771

[16] HorstT A, RottengruberH S, SeifertM, RinglerJ. Dynamic heat exchanger model for performance prediction and control system design of automotive waste heat recovery systems [J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 105(5): 293-303

[17] GnielinskiV. New equations for heat and mass transfer in the turbulent flow in pipes and channels [R]. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A, 1975, 75: 22028

[18] WojtanL, UrsenbacherT, ThomeJ R. Investigation of flow boiling in horizontal tubes: Part I—A new diabatic two-phase flow pattern map [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2005, 48(14): 2955-2969

[19] WojtanL, UrsenbacherT, ThomeJ R. Investigation of flow boiling in horizontal tubes: Part II—Development of a new heat transfer model for stratified-wavy, dryout and mist flow regimes [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2005, 48(14): 2970-2985

[20] El HajalJ, ThomeJ R, CavalliniA. Condensation in horizontal tubes, part 1: Two-phase flow pattern map [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2003, 46(18): 3349-3363

[21] ThomeJ R, El HajalJ, CavalliniA. Condensation in horizontal tubes, part 2: New heat transfer model based on flow regimes [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2003, 46(18): 3365-3387

[22] LiuH-w, LiS-w, ChenY, SunZ-qiang. The melting of phase change material in the cylinder shell with hierarchical heat sink array [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 73(1): 973-981