Nonlinear finite element analysis of effect of seismic waves on dynamic response of Shiziping dam

Xuan-ming Ding , Han-long Liu , Tao Yu , Gang-qiang Kong

Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (8) : 2323 -2332.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (8) : 2323 -2332. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-013-1740-3
Article

Nonlinear finite element analysis of effect of seismic waves on dynamic response of Shiziping dam

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Many high earth-rockfill dams are constructed in the west of China. The seismic intensity at the dam site is usually very high, thus it is of great importance to ensure the safety of the dam in meizoseismal area. A 3D FEM model is established to analyze the seismic responses of Shiziping earth-rockfill dam. The nonlinear elastic Duncan-Chang constitutive model and the equivalent viscoelastic constitutive model are used to simulate the static and dynamic stress-strain relationships of the dam materials, respectively. Four groups of seismic waves are inputted from the top of the bedrock to analyze the dynamic responses of the dam. The numerical results show that the calculated dynamic magnification factors display a good consistency with the specification values. The site spectrum results in larger acceleration response than the specification spectrum. The analysis of relative dynamic displacement indicates that the displacement at the downstream side of the dam is larger than that at the upstream side. The displacement response reduces from the center of river valley to two banks. The displacement responses corresponding to the specification spectrum are a little smaller than those corresponding to the site spectrum. The analysis of shear stress indicates that a large shear stress area appears in the upstream overburden layer, where the shear stress caused by site waves is larger than that caused by specification waves. The analysis of dynamic principal stress indicates that the minimum dynamic stresses in corridor caused by specification and site waves have little difference. The maximum and minimum dynamic stresses are relatively large at two sides. The largest tensile stress occurs at two sides of the floor of grouting corridor, which may result in the crack near the corridor side. The numerical results present good consistency with the observation data of the grouting corridor in Wenchuan earthquake.

Keywords

finite element method / earth-rockfill dam / dynamic response / acceleration response / seismic wave

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xuan-ming Ding, Han-long Liu, Tao Yu, Gang-qiang Kong. Nonlinear finite element analysis of effect of seismic waves on dynamic response of Shiziping dam. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(8): 2323-2332 DOI:10.1007/s11771-013-1740-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

SeiphooriA, HaeriS M, KarimiM. Three-dimensional nonlinear seismic analysis of concrete faced rockfill dams subjected to scattered P, SV, and SH waves considering the dam-foundation interaction effects [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(5): 792-804

[2]

DingX-m, KongG-q, LiP, ZhuMin. Finite element analysis of dynamic response of maoergai earth-rockfill dam in earthquake disaster [J]. Disaster Advances, 2012, 5(4): 685-690

[3]

KrenzerH. The use of risk analysis to support dam safety decision and management [C]. The Proceeding of 21st International Congress on Large Dams. Beijing, 2000799-801

[4]

FengT-g, LiuH-l, GaoY-f, FeiKang. Seismic response characteristic of horizontal layer [J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2009, 10(S): 74-79

[5]

LiH-j, ChiS-c, LinGao. A seismic stability analysis for reinforced slopes of high core rock-fill dams [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(12): 1881-1887

[6]

LiuX-s, WangZ-n, ZhaoJ-ming. Advancement of technology on shaking table model test and dynamic analysis of CFRD [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002, 2: 29-35

[7]

LiuA H, StewartJ P, AbrahamsonN A, MoriwakiY. Equivalent number of uniform cycles for soil liquefaction analysis [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(12): 1017-1026

[8]

WriggersP. Finite element algorithms for contact problems [J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1995, 2(4): 1-49

[9]

RohaninejadM, ZarghamiM. Combining Monte Carlo and finite difference methods for effective simulation of dam behavior [J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2012, 45(1): 197-202

[10]

CloughR W, TocherJ L. Finite element stiffness matrices for the analysis of plate bending[C]. Proceedings of 1st Conference on Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics. Ohio, 1966515-547

[11]

SeedH B, LeeK L, IdrissI M. An analysis of the sheffield dam failure [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division, ASCE, 1969, 94SM6: 1453-1490

[12]

XiangB, ZhangZ-l, ChiS-chun. An improved hypoplastic constitutive model of rockfill considering effect of stress path [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2009, 16(6): 1006-1013

[13]

NobumichiY, HiroshiT. Response analysis of flexible MDF systems for multiple-support seismic excitations [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1990, 19(3): 345-357

[14]

SaidM, AllamT K D. Seismic behaviour of cable-stayed bridges under multi-component random ground motion [J]. Engineering Structures, 1999, 21(1): 62-70

[15]

YuT, YangG, ChengG-x, WangZ-hua. Research of the earthquake disaster risk evaluation index system of earth and rockfill dam based on Wenchuan earthquake disaster [J]. Disaster Advances, 2012, 5(4): 1211-1217

[16]

AbdollahiM, AttarnejadR. Dynamic analysis of dam-reservoir-foundation interaction using finite difference technique [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(5): 1399-1410

[17]

GravesW R. Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences [J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1996, 86(4): 1091-1104

[18]

MarsalR J. Large scale testing on rockfill materials [J]. ASCE Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1967, 94(4): 1042-1047

[19]

ZhangG A, ZhangJ M. Numerical modeling of soil-structure interface of a concrete-faced rockfill dam [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(5): 762-772

[20]

MakdisisF I, SeedH B. Simplified procedure for estimating dam and embankments earthquake induced deformation [J]. ASCE Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1978, 104GT7: 849-867

[21]

SerffN, SeedH B, MarkdisiF I, ChanC YEarthquake induced deformation of earth dams [R], 1976BerkeleyUniversity of California

[22]

GuG-chenEarthquake engineering of earth-rockfill dam [M], 1989NanjingHohai University Press96-97

[23]

QianJ-h, YinZ-zeGeotechnical principle and calculation (the second edition) [M], 1996BeijingChina Water Power Press54-60

[24]

Specifications for seismic design of hydraulic structures. SL203-97 [S]. 1997. (in Chinese)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

119

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/