Comparative study on pullout behaviour of pressure grouted soil nails from field and laboratory tests

Abstract

Pullout resistance of a soil nail is a critical parameter in design and analysis for geotechnical engineers. Due to the complexity of field conditions, the pullout behaviour of cement grouted soil nail in field is not well investigated. In this work, a number of field pullout tests of pressure grouted soil nails were conducted to estimate the pullout resistance of soil nails. The effective bond lengths of field soil nails were accurately controlled by a new grouting packer system. Typical field test results and the related comparison with typical laboratory test results reveal that the apparent coefficient of friction (ACF) decreases with the increase of overburden soil pressure when grouting pressure is constant, but increases almost linearly with the increase of grouting pressure when overburden pressure (soil depth) is unchanged. Water contents of soil samples at soil nail surfaces show obvious reductions compared with the results of soil samples from drillholes. After soil nails were completely pulled out of the ground, surface conditions of the soil nails and surrounding soil were examined. It is found that the water content values of the soil at the soil/nail interfaces decrease substantially compared with those of soil samples extracted from drillholes. In addition, all soil nails expand significantly in the diametrical direction after being pulled out of ground, indicating that the pressurized cement grout compacts the soil and penetrates into soil voids, leading to a corresponding shift of failure surface into surrounding soil mass significantly.

Keywords

soil nail / apparent coefficient of friction / overburden soil pressure / grouting pressure

References

[1] LeeC F, LawK T, ThamL G, YueZ Q, JunaideenS M. Design of a large soil box for studying soil-nail interaction in loose fill [C]. Soft Soil Engineering: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Soft Soil Engineering, 2001413-418

[2] LuoS Q, TanS A, YongK Y. Pull-out resistance mechanism of a soil nail reinforcement in dilative soils [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40(1): 47-56

[3] MilliganG W E, TeiK. The pull-out resistance of model soil nails [J]. Journal of Soils and Foundations, 1998, 38(2): 179-190

[4] PradhanBStudy of pullout behaviour of soil nails in completely decomposed granite fill [D], 2003Hong Kong, ChinaThe University of Hong Kong

[5] PradhanB, ThamL, YueZ, JunaideenS, LeeC. Soil-nail pullout interaction in loose fill materials [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2006, 6: 238

[6] SuL J, ChanT C F, YinJ H, ShiuY K, ChiuS L. Influence of overburden pressure on soil-nail pullout resistance in a compacted fill [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2008, 134(9): 1339-1347

[7] YinJ H, ZhouW H. Influence of grouting pressure and overburden soili pressure on the interface resistance of a soil nail [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(9): 1198-1208

[8] WeatherbyD ETiebacks [R], 1982Washington D.CFederal Highway Administration

[9] ChuL M, YinJ H. Comparison of interface shear strength of soil nails measured by both direct shear box tests and pullout tests [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(9): 1097-1107

[10] YinJ H, SuL J, CheungR W M, ShiuY K, TangC. The influence of grouting pressure on the pullout resistance of soil nails in compacted completely decomposed granite fill [J]. Geotechnique, 2009, 59(2): 103-113

[11] ZhangL L, ZhangL M, TangW H. Uncertainties of field pullout resistance of soil nails [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(7): 966-972

[12] ZhouW HExperimental and theoretical study on pullout resistance of grouted soil nails [D], 2008Hong Kong, ChinaDepartment of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

[13] ShieldsD R, SchnabelH, WeatherbyD E. Load-Transfer in pressure injected anchors [J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1978, 104(9): 1183-1196

[14] EliasV, JuranISoil nailing for stabilization of highway slopes and excavations [R], 1991Washington D C, USA.Federal Highway Administration

[15] YeungA T, ChengY M, ThamL G, AuA S K, SoS T C, ChoiY K. Field evaluation of a glass-fiber soil reinforcement system [J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2007, 21(1): 26-34

[16] HongC YStudy on pullout resistance of cement grouted soil nails [D], 2011Hong Kong, ChinaThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University

[17] SchlosserF. Behaviour and design of soil nailing [C]. International Symposium on Recent Development in Ground Improvement Techniques. Bangkok, 1982399-413

[18] ChuL MStudy on the interface shear strength of soil nailing in completely decomposed granite (CDG) soil [D], 2003Hong Kong, ChinaThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University

[19] ChaiX J, HayashiS. Effect of constrained dilatancy on pull-out resistance of nails in sandy clay [J]. Ground Improvement, 2005, 9(3): 127-135