Dynamic limit equilibrium analysis of sliding block for rock slope based on nonlinear FEM

Yao-ru Liu , Zhu He , Kuang-dai Leng , Yue-qun Huang , Qiang Yang

Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (8) : 2263 -2274.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (8) : 2263 -2274. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-013-1733-2
Article

Dynamic limit equilibrium analysis of sliding block for rock slope based on nonlinear FEM

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Traditional rigid body limit equilibrium method (RBLEM) was adopted for the stability evaluation and analysis of rock slope under earthquake scenario. It is not able to provide the real stress distribution of the structure, while the strength reduction method relies on the arbitrary decision on the failure criteria. The dynamic limit equilibrium solution was proposed for the stability analysis of sliding block based on 3-D multi-grid method, by incorporating implicit stepping integration FEM. There are two independent meshes created in the analysis: One original 3-D FEM mesh is for the simulation of target structure and provides the stress time-history, while the other surface grid is for the simulation of sliding surface and could be selected and designed freely. As long as the stress time-history of the geotechnical structure under earthquake scenario is obtained based on 3-D nonlinear dynamic FEM analysis, the time-history of the force on sliding surface could be derived by projecting the stress time-history from 3-D FEM mesh to surface grid. After that, the safety factor time-history of the sliding block will be determined through applying limit equilibrium method. With those information in place, the structure’s aseismatic stability can be further studied. The above theory and method were also applied to the aseismatic stability analysis of Dagangshan arch dam’s right bank high slope and compared with the the result generated by Quasi-static method. The comparative analysis reveals that the method not only raises the FEM’s capability in accurate simulation of complicated geologic structure, but also increases the flexibility and comprehensiveness of limit equilibrium method. This method is reliable and recommended for further application in other real geotechnical engineering.

Keywords

dynamic stability / sliding block / limit equilibrium analysis / multi-grid / nonlinear FEM

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yao-ru Liu, Zhu He, Kuang-dai Leng, Yue-qun Huang, Qiang Yang. Dynamic limit equilibrium analysis of sliding block for rock slope based on nonlinear FEM. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(8): 2263-2274 DOI:10.1007/s11771-013-1733-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

JibsonR W. Methods for assessing the stability of slopes during earthquakes: A retrospective [J]. Engineering Geology, 2011, 122(1): 43-50

[2]

CaltabianoS, CasconeE, MaugeriM. Static and seismic limit equilibrium analysis of sliding retaining walls under different surcharge conditions [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 37: 38-55

[3]

ChenZ-y, WangX-g, XingY-c, YangJ, JiaZ-x, WangY-jieRock slope stability analysis: Theory methods and programs [M], 2005BeijingChina Water Power Press

[4]

YangX L, YinJ H. Slope stability analysis with nonlinear failure criterion [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130(3): 267-273

[5]

LenchmanJ B, GriffithsD V. Analysis of the progression of failure of the earth slopes by finite elements [C]. Slope Stability 2000: Proceedings of Sessions of Geo-Denver 2000, 2000, 289: 250-265

[6]

YangQ, LengK-d, ChangQ, LiuY-ru. Failure mechanism and control of geotechnical structures [M]. Constitutive Modeling of Geomaterials. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 201363-87

[7]

HuangM-s, JiaC-qin. Strength reduction FEM in stability analysis of soil slopes subjected to transient unsaturated seepagee [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(1): 93-101

[8]

WeiW B, ChengY M, LiL. Three-dimensional slope failure analysis by the strength reduction and limit equilibrium methods [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(1): 70-80

[9]

FuW-x, LiaoYi. Non-linear shear strength reduction technique in slope stability calculation [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2010, 37(3): 288-298

[10]

YangQ, ZhuL, XueL-jun. Computational accuracy of stability analysis based on 3-D multi-grid method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(1): 94-100

[11]

LiuY-r, YangQ, XueL-j, ZhouW-yuanCaiM-f, WangJ-a. Rock slop stability analysis with nonlinear finite element method [C]. Boundaries of Rock Mechanics: Recent Advances and Challenges for the 21st Century, 2008LondonTaylor & Francis Group503-507

[12]

NewmarkN M. Effects of earthquake on dams and embankments [J]. Geotechnique, 1965, 15(20): 139-159

[13]

RathjeE M, AntonakosG. A unified model for predicting earthquake-induced sliding displacements of rigid and flexible slopes [J]. Engineering Geology, 2011, 122(1): 51-60

[14]

SaygilI G, RathjeE M. Empirical predictive models for earthquake-induced sliding displacements of slopes [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironm ental Engineering, 2008, 134(6): 790-803

[15]

ZhangB-y, ChenH-qun. Analysis on abutment aseismatic stability by using finite element and rigid body limit equilibrium method [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 20(5): 665-670

[16]

LiuH-s, TangL-q, BoJ-s, LiuD-dong. New method for determining the seismic safety factor of a rock slope [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2001, 20(5): 665-670

[17]

QianJ-h, YingZ-zeTheory and computation of soil engineering [M], 1996BeijingChina Waterpower Press318-327

[18]

HjiajM, FortinJ, de SaxceG. A complete stress update algorithm for the non-associated Drucker-Prager model including treatment of the apex [J]. International Journal of Engineering Science, 2003, 41(10): 1109-1143

[19]

SchreyerH L, KulakR F, KramerJ M. Accurate numerical solutions for elastoplastic models [J]. Journals of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1979, 101(2): 226-234

[20]

ChenX, YangQ, HuangY-s, ChenXin. Sub-incremental method for perfect elasto-plastic material based on D-P yield criteria [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 2: 2465-2469

[21]

OrtizM, PopovE P. Accuracy and stability of integration algorithms for elastoplastic constitutive relations [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1985, 21(9): 1561-1576

[22]

LiuJ-b, DuX-liStructural dynamics [M], 2005BeijingChina Machine Press119-122

[23]

LiuJ-b, DuY-x, WangZ-y, WuJun. 3D Viscous-spring artificial boundary in time domain [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2006, 5(1): 93-102

[24]

LiuJ-b, DuY-x, YanQ-shi. Viscous-spring artificial boundary and earthquake wave input in the general finite element software [J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2007, 27: 37-42

[25]

DeeksA J, RandolphM F. Axisymmetric time-domain transmitting boundaries [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1994, 120(1): 25-42

[26]

LysmerJ, KuhlemeyerR L. Finite dynamic model for infinite media [J]. J Engng Mech Div ASCE, 1969, 95: 759-877

[27]

GhartiH N, KomatitschD, OyeV, MartinR, TrompJ. Application of an elastoplastic spectral-element method to 3D slope stability analysis [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 91(1): 1-26

[28]

WangY, CaoZ-j, AuS-kui. Practical reliability analysis of slope stability by advanced Monte Carlo simulations in a spreadsheet [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2010, 48(1): 162-172

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

108

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/