Effect of information delay on string stability of platoon of automated vehicles under typical information frameworks

Abstract

The effect of the information delay, which was caused by the nature of the distance sensors and wireless communication systems, on the string stability of platoon of automated vehicles was studied. The longitudinal vehicle dynamics model was built by taking the information delay into consideration, and three typical information frameworks, i.e., leader-predecessor framework (LPF), multiple-predecessors framework (MPF) and predecessor-successor framework (PSF), were defined and their related spacing error dynamics models in frequency domain were proposed. The string stability of platoon of automated vehicles was analyzed for the LPF, MPF and PSF, respectively. Meanwhile, the related sufficient string stable conditions were also obtained. The results demonstrate that the string stability can be guaranteed for the LPF and PSF with considering the information delay, but the ranges of the control gains of the control laws are smaller than those without considering the information delay. For the MPF, the “weak” string stability, which can be guaranteed without considering the information delay, cannot be obtained with considering the information delay. The comparative simulations further demonstrate that the LPF shows better string stability, but the PSF shows better string scalable performance.

Keywords

string stability / information delay / information framework / automated vehicle / intelligent transportation system

References

[1] XiaoL.-y., GaoFeng.. A comprehensive review of the development of adaptive cruise control (ACC) systems [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2010, 48(10): 1167-1192

[2] ChuK.. Decentralized control of high-speed vehicular strings [J]. Transportation Science, 1974, 8(3): 361-384

[3] DarbhaS., HedrickJ.. String stability of interconnected systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1996, 41(3): 349-357

[4] RajamaniR., ShladoverS.. An experimental comparative study of autonomous and co-operative vehicle-follower control systems [J]. Transportation Research: Part C, 2001, 9(1): 15-31

[5] MAHAL S. Effects of communication delays on string stability in an AHS environment [D]. Berkeley: University of California, 2000: 10–42.

[6] BiswasS., TatchikouR., DionF.. Vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication protocols for enhancing highway traffic safety [J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2006, 44(1): 74-82

[7] HAURIS J. Genetic algorithm optimization in a cognitive radio for autonomous vehicle communications [C]// Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. Jacksonville, 2007: 427–431.

[8] ZhouJ., PengHuei.. Range policy of adaptive cruise control vehicle for improved flow stability and string stability [J]. IEEE Transactions on ITS, 2005, 6(2): 229-237

[9] SheikholeslamS., DesoerC.. Control of interconnected nonlinear dynamical systems: The platoon problem [J]. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 1992, 37(6): 806-810

[10] SanthanakrishnanK., RajamaniR.. On spacing policies for highway vehicle automation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2003, 4(4): 198-204

[11] YANAKIEV D, KANELLAKOPOULOS I. Variable time headway for string stability of automated heavy-duty vehicles [C]// Proceedings of 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. New Orleans, 1995: 4077–4081.

[12] CookP.. Stable Control of vehicle convoys for safety and comfort [J]. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 2007, 52(3): 526-531

[13] DarbhaS., HedrickJ.. Constant spacing strategies for platooning in automated highway systems [J]. Journal of Dynamics Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1999, 121: 462-470

[14] LiuY., DionF., BiswasS.. Safety Assessment of information delay on performance of intelligent vehicle control system [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2006, 32(3): 16-25

[15] XIAO L Y, DARBHA S, GAO F. Stability of string of adaptive cruise control vehicles with parasitic delays and lags [C]// Proceedings of the 11th International IEEE Conference on ITS. Beijing, 2008: 1101–1106.

[16] XIAO Ling-yun, GAO Feng, WANG Jiang-feng. On scalability of platoon of automated vehicles for leader-predecessor information framework [C]// Proceedings of 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Xi’an, 2009: 1103–1108.

[17] MoskwaJ., HedrickJ.. Modeling and validation of automotive engines for control algorithm development [J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1992, 114: 278-285

[18] ZhangY., KosmatopoulosE., IoannouP., ChienC.. Autonomous intelligent cruise control using front and back information for tight vehicle following maneuvers [J]. IEEE Transaction of Vehicular Technology, 1999, 48(1): 319-328

[19] SeilerP., PantA., HedrickK.. Disturbance propagation in vehicle strings [J]. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 2004, 49(10): 1835-1841

[20] DarbhaS.. A note about the stability of a string of LTI systems [J]. Journal of Dynamics Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2002, 124: 472-475

[21] BAROOAH P, MEHTA P, HESPANHA J. Control of large vehicular platoons: Improving closed loop stability by mistuning [C]// Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference. New York, 2007: 4666–4671.