Influences of polishing on return loss of optical fiber connectors

Abstract

With Al₂O₃ and SiO₂ as polishing medium, under different polishing conditions, e.g. with different polishing pressure, polishing time and polishing fluid, the influences of polishing treatment on the return loss of optical fiber connectors were investigated. The return loss of optical fiber connectors is 32–38 dB before polishing. The results show that dry polishing (i.e. no polishing fluid) with Al₂O₃ has less influence on return loss of optical fiber connectors, while dry polishing with SiO₂ reduces return loss to about 20 dB because of the end-face of optical fiber contaminated. The wet polishing(i.e. using distilled water as polishing fluid) with Al₂O₃ or SiO₂ can increase return loss to 45–50 dB, but wet polishing with Al₂O₃ may produce optical fiber undercut depth of 80–140 nm. Wet polishing with SiO₂ should be preferentially selected for optical fiber connectors and polishing time should be controlled within 20–30 s.

Keywords

optical fiber connector / polishing / return loss / optical fiber undercut

References

[1] ChoyM M. Interferometric conversion of laser phase noise by single fiber-optic components[J]. Electronic Letters, 1987, 23(21): 1151-1152

[2] RsoR, CookJ S. High return loss connector design without using fiber contact or index matching [J]. Electronics Letters, 1986, 22(14): 731-732

[3] KiharaM, NagasawaS, TanifujiT. Temperature dependence of return loss for optical fiber connectors with refractive index-matching material [J]. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 1995, 7(7): 795-797

[4] KiharaM, NagasawaS, TanifujiT. Return loss characteristics of optical fiber connectors [J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 1996, 14(9): 1986-1991

[5] SuzukiN, SaruwatariM, OkuyamaM. Low insertion- and high return-loss optical connectors with a spherically convex-polished end [J]. Electronics Letters, 1986, 22(2): 110-112

[6] MitsuhashiM, OhnoK, SuzukiK. Development of a new portable spherical mirror-finish surface processing machine for the fabrication of optical fiber connector [J]. NEC Research & Development, 2001, 42(3): 298-303

[7] NagaseR, ShintakuT, SugitaE. Effect of axial compressive force for connection stability in PC optical fiber connectors [J]. Electronics Letters, 1987, 23(3): 103-105

[8] ShintakuT, NagaseR, SugitaE. Connection mechanism of physical-contact optical fiber connectors with spherical convex polished ends [J]. Applied Optics, 1991, 30(36): 5260-5265

[9] ShintakuT, SugitaE, NagaseR. Highly stable physical-contact optical fiber connectors with spherical convex ends [J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 1993, 11(2): 241-248

[10] KanayamaK, AndoY, NagaseR, et al.. Advanced physical contact technology for optical connectors [J]. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 1992, 4(11): 1284-1287

[11] MatsuiS, OhiraF, KoyabuK, et al.. Characterization of machining-damage layer for optical fiber ends—Relation between damaged layer and return loss [J]. Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 1998, 64(10): 1467-1471

[12] AvramE, MahmoodW, ÖzerM. Quantification of scattering from fiber surface irregularities [J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2002, 20(4): 634-637

[13] HeZu-yuan, MahmoodW, SahinciE, et al.. Effects of fiber end-face scratches on return loss performance of optical interface[A]. Active and Passive Optical Components for WDM Communications II, Proceedings of SPIE[C], 2002, Boston, The International Society for Optical Engineering: 480-487

[14] Norland E A. Improved method for measuring fiber undercut and protrusion on PC polished connectors [A]. Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering [C]. Boston, 1993, 1792: 44–53.