Identifying determinants of γ’ phase coarsening behavior in Co/CoNi-based superalloys with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)
Linlin Sun , Qingshuang Ma , Jingwen Zhang , Liming Yu , Jie Xiong , Huijun Li , Qiuzhi Gao
Journal of Materials Informatics ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 30
Identifying determinants of γ’ phase coarsening behavior in Co/CoNi-based superalloys with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)
The coarsening of γ’ phases in superalloys is influenced by multiple factors and significantly impacts mechanical properties, such as strength and creep resistance. While classical kinetic theory delineates the coarsening mechanisms of γ’ phases, it has limitations when excessive coarsening occurs. The challenge of identifying the pivotal factors that markedly affect the kinetic behavior of γ’ phase coarsening remains largely unresolved. This study utilized eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models to identify the CP and CPAE features that characterize the coarsening behavior of γ’ phases in Co/CoNi-based superalloys. Through meticulous analysis of CP features [aging temperature (T), the atomic fraction of the Ti element (cTi), the atomic fraction of the V element (cV), and the atomic fraction of the Ta element (cTa)] and CPAE features [T, Young’s modulus (E), electronegativity (EN), atomic radius (r), cTi, the differences of atomic radius (σr), and the differences of electronegativity (σEN)], we derived explicit mathematical expressions using symbolic classification approach, which offers improved interpretability compared to traditional black-box models. Our findings indicate that T, cTi,
Co/CoNi-based superalloys / γ’ phase coarsening behavior / model interpretation / symbolic classification
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Lundberg S, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv 2017;arXiv:1705.07874. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07874. [Last accessed on 21 Dec 2024] |
| [19] |
Garreau D, Luxburg U. Explaining the explainer: a first theoretical analysis of LIME. arXiv 2020;arXiv:2001.03447. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.03447. [Last accessed on 21 Dec 2024] |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Chen TQ, Guestrin C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. arXiv 2016;arXiv:1603.02754. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.02754. [Last accessed on 21 Dec 2024] |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |