Morphological differences of hindlimb levers between wild and farmed American mink (Neovison vison) and implications for reintroduction of mustelids

Abstract

Reintroduction is an important strategy to restore or re-establish wild populations of endangered species. Pre-release training is a necessary step to ensure post-reintroduction survival. However, studies reported contradicting outcomes after pre-release training of juveniles and adults. This study used farmed and feral American mink (Neovison vison) to analyze the influence of captive breeding on the morphology, structure and efficiency of the two major hindlimb levers, the femur and tibia pivoted by hip and knee joints that are essential for locomotion. Results showed that captive breeding did not alter the sexual dimorphism of the two levers that are related to survival in the wild. Captive-bred mink showed slightly altered morphology of the femur and fundamental structure of the hindlimb levers that improved efficiency, but this resulted in reduction of performance related to foraging in both terrestrial and aquatic environments, especially for females. These findings suggest that reintroduction of mustelid as exampled by the mink here should focus on juveniles because the skeletal alterations associated with captive rearing were recorded only among adults and are irreversible in adulthood. In contrast, captive-reared juveniles showed no skeletal alterations and would be expected to recovery from any atrophy of the muscular system caused by captive rearing for shorter durations. Our results support the application of pre-release training of juveniles in enriched environments as a method for alleviating structural alteration of appendages and enhancing locomotion to increase survival probability in complex habitats.

Keywords

Hindlimb lever / Morphology / American mink / Neovison vison / Reintroduction

References

[1] Abhishek S, Deepak M, Davinder KG, Waseem M. Correlation of femoral shaft length and tibia length with the performance of athletes in speed, agility and strength. Med Sport, 2012, 8(3): 1922-1926.

[2] Axelsson HMK, Aldén E, Lidfors L. Behaviour in female mink housed in enriched standard cages during winter. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2009, 121: 222-229.

[3] Berman AG, Clauser CA, Wunderlin C, Hammond MA, Wallace JM. Structural and mechanical improvements to bone are strain dependent with axial compression of the tibia in female C57BL/6 mice. PLoS ONE, 2015 10 6 e0130504

[4] Biggins DE, Vargas A, Godbey JL, Anderson SH. Influence of prerelease experience on reintroduced black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes). Biol Conserv, 1999, 89: 121-129.

[5] Blumstein DT, Mari M, Daniel JC, Ardron JG, Griffin AS, Evans CS. Olfactory predator recognition: wallabies may have to learn to be wary. Anim Conserv, 2002, 5: 87-93.

[6] Box HO. Training for life after release: simian primates as examples. Symp Zool Soc Lond, 1991, 62: 111-123.

[7] Brechue WF, Abe T. The role of FFM accumulation and skeletal muscle architecture in powerlifting performance. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2002, 86: 327-336.

[8] Bremner-Harrison S, Prodohl PA, Elwood RW. Behavioural trait assessment as a release criterion: boldness predicts early death in a reintroduction programme of captive-bred swift fox (Vulpes velox). Anim Conserv, 2004, 7: 313-320.

[9] Bright PW. Lessons from lean beasts: conservation biology of the mustelids. Mammal Rev, 2000, 30(3–4): 217-226.

[10] Bruton A. Muscle plasticity: response to training and detraining. Physiotherapy, 2002, 88: 398-408.

[11] Burger EH, Klein-Nulen J. Responses of bone cells to biomechanical forces in vitro. Adv Dent Res, 1999, 13: 93-98.

[12] Carrier DR. Ontogenetic limits on locomotor performance. Physiol Zool, 1996, 69: 467-488.

[13] Dawkins MS. Behavioural deprivation: a central problem in animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 1988, 20: 209-225.

[14] Figueiredo VC, de Salles BF, Trajano GS. Volume for muscle hypertrophy and health outcomes: the most effective variable in resistance training. Sport Med, 2018, 48: 499-505.

[15] Fish FE. Biomechanics and energetics in aquatic and semiaquatic mammals: platypus to whale. Physiol Biochem Zool, 2000, 73: 683-698.

[16] Flück M. Functional, structural and molecular plasticity of mammalian skeletal muscle in response to exercise stimuli. J Exp Biol, 2006, 209: 2239-2248.

[17] Foster A, Buckley H, Tayles N. Using enthesis robusticity to infer activity in the past: a review. J Archaeol Method Theory, 2014, 21: 511-533.

[18] Fukunaga T, Miyatani M, Tachi M, Kouzaki M, Kawakami Y, Kanehisa H. Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans. Acta Phys Scand, 2001, 172: 249-255.

[19] Griffin AS, Blumstein DT, Evans CS. Training captive bred or translocated animals to avoid predators. Conserv Biol, 2000, 14: 1317-1326.

[20] Griffin AS, Evans CS, Blumstein DT. Learning specificity in acquired predator recognition. Anim Behav, 2001, 62: 577-589.

[21] Guo YR, Wang LL, Jin Y. Opportunity, challenges and countermeasures of wildlife farming in Great Xingan Mountains Region. Chin J Wildl, 2006, 27(5): 29-31.

[22] Hansen SW. Selection for behavioural traits in farm mink. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 1996, 49: 137-148.

[23] Hansen BK, Su G, Berg P. Genetic variation in litter size and kit survival of mink (Neovison vison). J Anim Breed Genet, 2010, 127: 442-451.

[24] Harris MA, Steudel K. The relationship between maximum jumping performance and hind limb morphology/physiology in domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus). J Exp Biol, 2002, 205: 3877-3889.

[25] Hawkey DE, Merbs CF. Activity-induced musculoskeletal stress markers (MSM) and subsistence strategy changes among ancient Hudson Bay Eskimos. Int J Osteoarchaeol, 1995, 5: 324-338.

[26] Higham TE. The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: morphology, behavior, and performance. Integr Comp Biol, 2007, 47: 82-95.

[27] Hua Y, Liu R, Liu X. Preliminary study on the behavioral profile of the American mink in captivity. Heilongjiang Anim Sci Vet Med, 2011, 11: 137-139.

[28] James RS, Wilson RS. Explosive jumping: extreme morphological and physiological specializations of Australian rocket frogs (Litoria nasuta). Physiol Biochem Zool, 2008, 81(2): 176-185.

[29] Järvinen TLN, Pajamäki I, Sievänen H, Vuohelainen T, Tuukkanen J, Järvinen M, Kannus P. Femoral neck response to exercise and subsequent deconditioning in young and adult rats. J Bone Miner Res, 2003, 18: 1292-1299.

[30] Jule KR, Leaver LA, Lea SEG. The effects of captive experience on reintroduction survival in carnivores: a review and analysis. Biol Conserv, 2008, 14(2): 355-363.

[31] Kleiman DG. Reintroduction of captive mammals for conservation: guidelines for reintroducing endangered species into the wild. Bioscience, 1989, 39: 152-161.

[32] Korablev MP, Korablev NP, Korablev PN. Population aspects of sexual dimorphism in Mustelidae from the example of four species (Mustela lutreola, Neovison vison, Mustela putorius, and Martes martes). Biol Bull, 2013, 40: 61-69.

[33] Larivière S. Mustela vison. Mammal Species, 1999, 608: 1-9.

[34] Lodé T, Cormier JP, Le Jacques D. Decline in endangered species as an indication of anthropic pressures: the case of European mink Mustela lutreola western population. Environ Manag, 2001, 28: 727-735.

[35] Maran T, Põdra M, Põlma M, Macdonald DW. The survival of captive-born animals in restoration programmes—case study of the endangered European mink Mustela lutreola. Biol Conserv, 2009, 142: 1685-1692.

[36] Marini M, Veicsteinas A. The exercised skeletal muscle: a review. Eur J Transl Myol Myol Rev, 2010, 20(3): 105-120.

[37] Mariotti V, Facchini F, Belcastro MG. The study of entheses: proposal of a standardised scoring method for twenty-three entheses of the postcranial skeleton. Coll Antropol, 2007, 31: 291-313.

[38] Meleroa Y, Santulli G, Gómez A, Gosàlbez J, Rodriguez-Refojos C, Palazón S. Morphological variation of introduced species: the case of American mink (Neovison vison) in Spain. Mammal Biol, 2012, 77: 345-350.

[39] Priddel D, Wheeler R. Effect of Age at release on the susceptibility of captive-reared malleefowl Leipoa ocellata to predation by the introduced fox Vulpes vulpes. EMU, 1996, 96: 32-41.

[40] Robert A, Sarrazin F, Couvet D, Stephane Legendre S. Releasing adults versus young in reintroductions: interactions between demography and genetics. Conserv Biol, 2004, 18: 1078-1087.

[41] Rönningen K, Olausson A, Rosberg S-O, Johansson I. The use of selection index theory to select breeding females in mink: a preliminary study. Z Tierzüch Züchtungsbiol, 1980, 97(1–4): 166-175.

[42] Saiyed Zubeir M, Pais V, Afshan S, Shemjaz A, Pais S. Relationship of limb girth, segmental limb length, hamstring flexibility with vertical jump in male sports players. Int J Curr Res Rev, 2015, 7: 72-75.

[43] Sarrazin F, Legendre S. Demographic approach to releasing adults versus young in reintroductions. Conserv Biol, 2000, 14: 488-500.

[44] Schoenfeld BJ, Contreras B, Krieger J, Grgic J, Delcastillo K, Belliard R, Alto A. Resistance training volume enhances muscle hypertrophy but not strength in trained men. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2019, 51: 94-103.

[45] Shepherdson D. Olney PJS, Mace GM. The role of environmental enrichment in the captive breeding and reintroduction of endangered species. Creative conservation: interactive management of wild and captive animals, 1994, Cham: Springer 167 177

[46] Shier DM, Owings DH. Effects of predator training on behavior and post-release survival of captive prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Biol Conserv, 2006, 132: 126-135.

[47] Shier DM, Owings DH. Effects of social learning on predator training and postrelease survival in juvenile black-tailed prairie dogs, Cynomys ludovicianus. Anim Behav, 2007, 73: 567-577.

[48] Stevens RT, Kennedy ML. Spatial patterns of sexual dimorphism in minks (Mustela vison). Am Midl Nat, 2005, 154: 207-216.

[49] Stoinski TS, Beck BB. Changes in locomotor and foraging skills in captive-born, reintroduced golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia). Am J Primatol, 2004, 62: 1-13.

[50] Thom MD, Harrington LA, Macdonald DW. Why are American mink sexually dimorphic? A role for niche separation. Oikos, 2004, 105: 525-535.

[51] Vargas A, Anderson SH. Effects of experience and cage enrichment on predatory skills of black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes). J Mammal, 1999, 80(1): 263-269.

[52] Williams TM. Locomotion in the north American mink, a semi-aquatic mammal. II. The effect of an elongate body on running energetics and gait patterns. J Exp Biol, 1983, 105: 283-295.

[53] Williams TM. Locomotion in the north American mink, a semi-aquatic mammal. I. Swimming energetics and body drag. J Exp Biol, 1983, 103: 155-168.

[54] Williams TM, Ben-David M, Noren S, Rutishauser M, McDonald K, Heyward W. Running energetics of the North American river otter: do short legs necessarily reduce efficiency on land?. Comp Biochem Physiol A, 2002, 133: 203-212.