Decomposition dynamics and ecological stoichiometry of Quercus acutissima and Pinus densiflora litter in the Grain to Green Program Area of northern China

Abstract

Litter decomposition and ecological stoichiometry of nutrient release is an important part of material cycling and energy flow in forest ecosystems. In a study of the ecological stoichiometry and nutrient release during litter decomposition in a pine–oak forest ecosystem of the Grain to Green Program (GTGP) area of northern China, a typical pine and oak species (PDS: Pinus densiflora Sieb., QAC: Quercus acutissima Carr.) were selected in the Taiyi Mountain study area. The ecological stoichiometry characteristics of carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) and litter decomposition dynamics were studied by field sampling and quantitative analyses. The results showed the following. (1) The decomposition dynamics of both litters was slow-fast-slow. The most important climatic factor affecting the litter decomposition rate from May to October was precipitation and temperature from November to April of the following year. (2) Throughout the 300-day study, in both litters, C of the two litters was released, N first accumulated and was then released, and P exhibited a release-accumulate-release pattern. (3) C:P was significantly higher than C:N and N:P (p < 0.05); the C:N of PSD litter was higher than that of QAC (p < 0.05), but the N:P of QAC litter was higher than that of PSD litter (p < 0.05). The C:N of both litters was very high in the study area, indicating that the nutrient release ability during litter decomposition in the two typical pine–oak forest ecosystems was relatively weak; therefore, more attention should be paid to nitrogen-fixing species and mixed forests in the GTGP area of northern China.

Keywords

Decomposition dynamics / Ecological stoichiometry / Litter / Pinus densiflora / Quercus acutissima / Grain to Green Program (GTGP)

References

[1] Angst S, Cajthaml T, Angst G, Simackova H, Brus J, Frouz J. Retention of dead standing plant biomass (marcescence) increases subsequent litter decomposition in the soil organic layer. Plant Soil, 2017, 418: 571-579.

[2] Aon MA, Cabello MN, Sarena DE, Colaneri AC, Franco MG, Burgos JL, Cortassa SI. Spatio-temporal patterns of soil microbial and enzymatic activities in an agricultural soil. Appl Soil Ecol, 2001, 18: 239-254.

[3] Bai GY, Wang SZ, Leng XT, Bai Y. Bio-environmental mechanism of herbaceous peat forming. Acta Geogr Sin, 1999, 54: 247-254.

[4] Bao SD. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis, 2010, Beijing: Chin Agric Press.

[5] Chen T, Xi M, Kong FL, Li Y, Pang LH. Review on litter decomposition and influence factors. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016, 35: 1927-1935.

[6] Das C, Mondal NK. Litterfall, decomposition and nutrient release of Shorea robusta and Tectona grandis in a sub-tropical forest of West Bengal, Eastern India. J For Res, 2016, 27: 1055-1065.

[7] Ding XJ, Xie GL, Jing RY, Ma FY, Liu FC, Ma HL. Decomposition characteristics of litters in different mixed forest of Robinia pseudoacacia in Yellow River Delta. J Soil Water Conserv, 2016, 30: 249-307.

[8] Dorrepaal E, Cornelissen JHC, Aerts R, Wallen B, Logtestijn RSP. Are growth forms consistent predictors of leaf litter quality and decomposability across peatlands along a latitudinal gradient. J Ecol, 2005, 93: 817-828.

[9] Gao JQ, Ouyang H, Lu XG, Wang G. Study on litter decomposition and influence factors in Calamagrostis Angustifolia wetland in Sanjiang plain. J Soil Water Conserv, 2004, 18: 121-124.

[10] He JS, Han X. Ecological stoichiometry: Searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34: 2-6.

[11] Jing RY, Huang YL, Ding XJ, Chen BJ, Ma FY. Difference of litter decomposition in Robinia pseudocacia and Fraxinus velutina mixed forests with different ages in Yellow River Delta. J Soil Water Conserv, 2017, 31: 333-337.

[12] Kang HZ, Xin ZJ, Berg B. Global pattern of leaf litter nitrogen and phosphorus in woody plants. Ann Forest Sci, 2010, 67: 811.

[13] Li DS, Zhang P, Zhang SL, Yi JD, Lv FD. Function of vegetation and its selection in Huangqian Reservoir area. J Soil Water Conserv, 2003, 4: 128-131.

[14] Li XB, Ma L, Chen L Research progress and the prospect of grassland litters decomposition. Ecol Environ Sci, 2010, 19: 2260-2264.

[15] Li LJ, Zeng DH, Yu ZY, Fan ZP, Yang D, Liu YX. Impact of litter quality and soil nutrient availability on leaf decomposition rate in a semi-arid grassland of Northeast China. J Arid Environ, 2011, 75: 787-792.

[16] Li CJ, Lei JQ, Xu XW, Tang QL, Gao P, Wang YD. The stoichiometric characteristics of C, N, P for artificial plants and soil in the hinterland of Taklimakan Desert. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33: 5760-5767.

[17] Li XB, Chen L, Wu XL, Song NP, Li X. Litter decomposition rates and influencing factors of four typical plantcommunities in desert steppe. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35: 4105-4114.

[18] Liu ST, Gao P, Liu PW, Niu X, Wang B. An ecosystem services assessment of Tai Mountain. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37: 3302-3310.

[19] Ma WJ, Zhao YT, Zhang QQ, Ali A, Shi QR, Yan ER. C:N:P stoichiometry in forest floor litter of evergreen broad-leaved forests at different suc-cessional stages in Tiantong, Zhejiang, eastern China. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38: 833-842.

[20] Niu DC, Li Q, Jiang SG, Chang PJ, Fu H. Seasonal variations of leaf C:N:P stoichiometry of six shrubs in desert of China’s Alxa Pla-teau. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37: 317-325.

[21] Ouyang LM, Wang C, Wang WQ, Tong C. Carbon nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometric characteristics during thedecomposition of Spartina alterniflora and Cyperus malaccensis var.brevifolius litters. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33: 389-394.

[22] Pan KW, He J, Wu N. Effect of forest litter on microenvironment conditions of forestland. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004, 15: 153-158.

[23] Pan FJ, Zhang W, Wang KL, He XY, Liang SC, Wei GF. Litter C:N:P ecologica1 stoichiometry character of plant communities in typical Karst Peak-Cluster Depression. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31: 335-343.

[24] Parton W, Silver WL, Burker IC. Gloabal-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during longterm decomposition. Science, 2007, 315: 361-364.

[25] Sayad E, Hosseini V, Gholami S, Salehe-Shooshtari MH. Different predictors determining litter decomposition rate in functional groups of the tree plantations in a common garden. Trees, 2015, 29: 1883-1891.

[26] Song YT, Zhou DW, Li Q, Wang P, Huang YX. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in 80 herbaceous plant species of Songnen grassland in Northeast China. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36: 222-230.

[27] Song YY, Song CC, Ren JS, Tan WW, Jin SF, Jiang L. Influence of nitrogen additions on litter decomposition, nutrient dynamics, and enzymatic activity of two plant species in a peatland in Northeast China. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 625: 640-646.

[28] Wang WQ, Zeng CS, Zhong CQ, Tong C. Effect of human disturbance on ecological stoichiometry characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in Minjiang River Estuarine wetland. Environ Sci, 2010, 31: 2411-2416.

[29] Wang J, You YM, Tang ZX, Sun XL, Sun JXO. A comparison of decomposition dynamics among green tree leaves, partially decomposed tree leaf litter and their mixture in a warm temperate forest ecosystem. J For Res, 2016, 27: 1037-1045.

[30] Wei L, Cheng JM, Jing GH, Zhao J, Su JS, Liu J, Jin JW. Effects of stimulated nitrogen deposition the fine root decomposition and nutrient release of three dominant species in natural grass land on the Loess Plateau. J Soil Water Conserv, 2018, 32: 252-258.

[31] Wu HT, Lu XG, Yang Q. Factors affecting litter decomposition of wetland herbaceous macrophytes. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006, 25: 1405-1411.

[32] Wu HT, Lu XG, Yang Q, Jiang M. Ecological characteristics and functions of soil fauna community. Acta Pedol Sin, 2006, 43: 314-323.

[33] Xie YJ, Xie YH, Xiao HY, Chen XS, Li F. Controls on litter decomposition of emergent Macrophyte in Dongting Lake wetlands. Ecosystems, 2017, 20: 1383-1389.

[34] Xu ZF, Yin HJ, Zhao CZ, Cao G, Wang ML, Liu Q. A review of response of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystem to global warming. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33: 1208-1219.

[35] Xu ZF, Zhu JX, Wu FZ, Liu Y, Tan B, Yang WQ. Effects of litter quality and climate change along an elevational gradient on litter decomposition of subalpine forests, Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. J For Res, 2016, 27: 505-511.

[36] Yang JS, Liu JS, Yu JB, Wang JD, Li XH, Sun ZG. Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of marsh litter in the Sanjiang Plain, China. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26: 1297-1302.

[37] Yuan ZY, Han YH. Global trends in senesced-leaf nitrogen and phosphorus. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 2009, 18: 532-542.

[38] Zhang LY, Gao P, Wang CJ, Liu ST, Li X. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon in the forestland of the Yaoxiang small watershed in central and southern Shandong Province. J Soil Water Conserv, 2015, 13: 83-89.

[39] Zhang MX, Wang DX, Peng SL, Huan YK, Zhang GG. Community stability analysis for the oak–pine mixed forest in Qinling Mountains. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35: 2564-2573.

[40] Zhang XH, Sun XX, Mao R. Effects of litter evenness, nitrogen enrichment and temperature on short-term litter decomposition in freshwater marshes of Northeast China. Wetlands, 2017, 37: 145-152.

[41] Zhao TQ, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Wang XK, Miao H. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China. J Nat Resour, 2004, 19: 480-491.

[42] Zhao GF, Cai Y, Luo YY, Li MH, Yu MJ. Nutrient dynamics in litter decomposition in an evergreen broad-leaved forest in EastChina. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26: 3286-3295.

[43] Zhou P, Geng Y, Ma WH, He JS. Linkages of functional traits among plant organs in the dominant species of the Inner Mongo-lia grassland. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34: 7-16.