The effects of vegetation restoration strategies and seasons on soil enzyme activities in the Karst landscapes of Yunnan, southwest China

Abstract

Soil enzymes play a vital role in biogeochemical cycling and ecosystem functions. In this study, we examined the response of six soil enzymes to changes in physicochemical properties resulting from changes in season and vegetation and geological conditions. Catalase, urease, acid phosphatase, invertase, amylase, and cellulase not only promote carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling, but also participate in the decomposition of harmful substances. Thirty-six soil samples were collected from karst and non-karst areas in two different seasons and from three different types of vegetation in Yunnan province, southwest China. Both vegetation types and season had significant effects on soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities. In the same plot, soil water content, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus increased in the rainy season, indicating enhanced microbial metabolic activity. With the exception of urease activity, the remaining five enzymes showed higher activity in the rainy season. Changes in activities between the two seasons were significant in all samples. In the same season, activity levels of soil enzymes were higher in karst areas than in non-karst areas, and higher in natural forest than in artificial forests. The transformative abilities of soil elements are higher in karst areas than in non-karst areas, and higher in natural forests than in artificial forests. Correlation analysis showed that the activities of the six enzymes correlated significantly; however, soil physical and chemical indices, such as organic matter, pH, and moisture, which are essential for enzyme activity, differed by season. Redundancy analysis also revealed that the main factors influencing enzyme activity differed between the two seasons. The results from this study provide a theoretical basis for further research on the restoration of natural ecological systems in karst landscapes.

Keywords

Karst / Soil enzymes / Vegetation / Season / Natural forest

References

[1] Adetunji AT, Lewu FB, Mulidzi R, Ncube B. The biological activities of β-glucosidase, phosphatase and urease as soil quality indicators. J Soil Sci Plant Nut, 2017, 17: 794-807.

[2] Andersen R, Chapman SJ, Artz RRE. Microbial communities in natural and disturbed peat lands. Soil Biol Biochem, 2013, 57: 979-994.

[3] Antonelli ML, Carunchio V, Luciani M, Vinci G. Determination of the urease activity and the relative inhibition in the presence of some metal ions: a micro calorimetric study. Thermochim Acta, 1987, 122: 95-103.

[4] Baldrian P. Distribution of extracellular enzymes in soils: spatial heterogeneity and determining factors at various scales. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2014, 78: 11-18.

[5] Bao SD. Soil agricultural chemistry analysis, 2008, Beijing: China Agriculture Press.

[6] Bechmann ME, Stalnacke P, Kaerno SH. Testing the Norwegian phosphorus index at the field and subcatchment scale. Agr Ecosyst Environ, 2007, 120: 117-128.

[7] Chen H, Luo P, Wen L, Yang LQ, Wang KL, Li DJ. Determinants of soil extracellular enzyme activity in a karst region, southwest China. Eur J Soil Biol, 2017, 80: 69-76.

[8] Dakora FD, Phillips DA. Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in low-nutrient environments. Plant Soil, 2002, 245(1): 35-47.

[9] Das SK, Varma A (2010) Role of Enzymes in Maintaining Soil Health. Soil Enzymology

[10] Emilia CRL, Eduardo RV. Microbial activity in soil and sediments of the upper Arzobispo River basin. Agron Colomb, 2011, 29: 449-455.

[11] Fan ZZ, Lu SY, Wang J, Guo DC, Pang DB, Zhou JX, Peng XW. Microbial and enzyme activities in rhizosphere soil of different forest stand in karst and non karst areas. J Beijing For Univ, 2018, 40(7): 55-61.

[12] García-Orenes F, Roldán A, Morugán-Coronado A, Linares C, Cerdà A, Caravaca F. Organic fertilization in traditional mediterranean grapevine orchards mediates changes in soil microbial community structure and enhances soil fertility. Land Degrad Dev, 2016, 27(6): 1622-1628.

[13] Gianfreda L. Enzymes of importance to rhizosphere processes. J Soil Sci Plant Nut, 2015, 15: 283-306.

[14] Göransson H, Edwards PJ, Perreijn K, Smittenberg RH, Olde Venterink H. Rocks create nitrogen hotspots and N: P heterogeneity by funnelling rain. Biogeochemistry, 2014, 121: 329-338.

[15] He XY, Wang KL, Zhang W, Chen ZH, Zhu YG, Chen HS. Positive correlation between soil bacterial metabolic and plant species diversity and bacterial and fungal diversity in a vegetation succession on Karst. Plant Soil, 2008, 307: 123-134.

[16] Holtmeier FK, Broll G. Sensitivity and response of northern hemisphere altitudinal and polar treelines to environmental change at landscape and local scales. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 2005, 14: 395-410.

[17] Hou WJ, Gao JB, Peng T, Wu SH, Dai EF. Review of ecosystem vulnerability studies in the karst region of Southwest China based on a structure-function-habitat framework. Prog Geog, 2016, 35: 320-330.

[18] Hu LN, Su YR, He XY, Wu JS, Zheng H, Li Y, Wang AH. Response of soil organic carbon mineralization in typical Karst soils following the addition of 14C-labeled rice straw and CaCO₃. J Sci Food Agr, 2012, 92: 1112-1118.

[19] Iovieno P, Morra L, Leone A, Pagano L, Alfani A. Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil respiration and enzyme activities of two Mediterranean horticultural soils. Biol Fert Soils, 2009, 45: 555-561.

[20] Johansson E, Krantz-Rulcker C, Zhang BX, Oberg G. Chlorination and biodegradation of lignin. Soil Biol Biochem, 2000, 32: 1029-1032.

[21] Kooch Y, Sanji R, Tabari M. Increasing tree diversity enhances microbial and enzyme activities in temperate iranian forests. Trees, 2018, 32: 809-822.

[22] Li YY, Shao MA. Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China. J Arid Environ, 2006, 64: 77-96.

[23] Li W, Zhou PP, Jia LP, Yu LJ, Li XL, Min Z. Limestone dissolution induced by fungal mycelia, acidic materials, and carbonic anhydrase from fungi. Mycopathologia, 2009, 167: 37-46.

[24] Li Q, Liang JH, He YY, Yu S. Effect of land use on soil enzyme activities at karst area in Nanchuan, Chongqing, Southwest China. Plant Soil Environ, 2014, 60: 15-20.

[25] Liang C, Gasco G, Fu S, Mendez A, Paz-Ferreiro J. Biochar from pruning residues as a soil amendment: effects of pyrolysis temperature and particle size. Soil Till Res, 2016, 164: 3-10.

[26] Maddela NR, Venkateswarlu K (2018) Impact of acephate and buprofezin on soil cellulases. In: Insecticides−Soil Microbiota Interactions. Springer, Cham

[27] Mandal A, Patra AK, Singh D, Swarup A, Masto RE. Effect of long-term application of manure and fertilizer on biological and biochemical activities in soil during crop development stages. Bioresource Technol, 2007, 98: 3585-3592.

[28] Margesin R, Zimmerbauer A, Schinner F. Monitoring of bioremediation by soil biological activities. Chemosphere, 2000, 40: 339-346.

[29] Mclaren AD. Biochemistry and soil science. Science, 1963, 141: 1141-1147.

[30] Meng YN, Zhang QF, Gao JT, Zheng Y, Zhou JC, Chen YM, Yang YS. Seasonal response of extracellular enzyme activity to precipitation exclusion in a subtropical Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38: 2119-2127.

[31] Pan FJ, Zhang W, Liang YM, Liu SJ, Wang KL. Increased associated effects of topography and litter and soil nutrients on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass along vegetation successions in karst ecosystem, southwestern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2018, 25: 16979-16990.

[32] Qi L, Zhang X, Peng Z, Zhou J. Canonical correlation analysis of soil nutrients, microorganisms and enzyme activities in vegetation restoration areas of degraded and eroded soils in northwestern Hunan province, China. Front For China, 2009, 4: 443-449.

[33] Ramos LP, Breuil C, Saddler JN. The use of enzyme recycling and the influence of sugar accumulation on cellulose hydrolysis by Trichoderma, cellulases. Enzyme Microb Tech, 1993, 15: 19-25.

[34] Rustad L, Campbell J, Marion G, Norby R, Mitchell M, Hartley A, Cornelissen J, Gurevitch J GCTE-NEWS. A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia, 2001, 126(4): 543-562.

[35] Sardans J, Penuelas J, Estiarte M. Changes in soil enzymes related to C and N cycle and in soil C and N content under prolonged warming and drought in a Mediterranean shrub land. Appl Soil Ecol, 2008, 39: 223-235.

[36] Sperber CV, Kries H, Tamburini F, Bernasconi SM, Frossard E. The effect of phosphomonoesterases on the oxygen isotope composition of phosphate. Geochim Cosmochim Ac, 2014, 125: 519-527.

[37] Tian L, Shi W. Short-term effects of plant litter on the dynamics, amount, and stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity in agroecosystems. Eur J Soil Biol, 2014, 65: 23-29.

[38] Trasar-Cepeda C, Gil-Sotres F, Leiros MC. Thermodynamic parameters of enzymes in grassland soils from Galicia, NW Spain. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39: 311-319.

[39] Wu B, Wang Z, Zhang Q, Shen N. Distinguishing transport-limited and detachment-limited processes of interrill erosion on steep slopes in the Chinese loessial region. Soil Till Res, 2018, 177: 88-96.

[40] Xia ZW, Bai E, Wang QK, Gao DC, Zhou JD, Jiang P, Wu JB. Biogeographic distribution patterns of bacteria in typical Chinese forest soils. Front Microbiol, 2016, 7: 1106.

[41] Xie SY, Wang J. Soil ecosystem degradation of karst regions in southwestern China. Asian Agr Res, 2012, 9: 60-63.

[42] Yan ST. Study of Soil Enzyme Composition of Soil Fauna at Kuncheng Lake. J Anhui Agr Sci, 2013, 41: 3345-3347.

[43] Yang H, Zhang LK, Shi YU, Cao JH. Effects of different land-uses on the features of water-stable aggregates in karst and clasolite areas in Maocun, Guilin. Carsologica Sinica, 2012, 31: 265-271.

[44] Yao HY. Soil microbial ecology and its experimental techniques, 2006, Beijing: Science Press.

[45] Yao XH, Min H, Lü ZH, Yuan HP. Influence of acetamiprid on soil enzymatic activities and respiration. Eur J Soil Biol, 2006, 42: 120-126.

[46] Yuan DX. Karst of China, 1991, Beijing: Geological Publishing House.

[47] Zhang PJ, Li LQ, Pan GX, Ren JC. Soil quality changes in land degradation as indicated by soil chemical, biochemical and microbiological properties in a karst area of southwest Guizhou, China. Environ Geol, 2006, 51: 609-619.

[48] Zhao SH, Zhang C, Xia Q, Shen HG. The primary analysis of soil organic matter and nitrogen in karst and non-karst areas of maocun, Guilin. J Guangxi Acad Sci, 2007, 23: 36-38.

[49] Zhao WN, Wang YX, Chen QB. Relationships between the soil enzyme activity, physical chemical properties and microorganism quantity in Quercus aquifolioides forest. J Northeast For Univ, 2015, 43: 72-77.

[50] Zheng SZ, Xiao QL, Wu WD, He YQ. Relationship among microbial groups, enzyme activity and physico-chemical properties under different artificial forestry in hilly red soil. Chin J Eco-Agr, 2008, 16: 57-61.

[51] Zhu H, He X, Wang K, Su Y, Wu J. Interactions of vegetation succession, soil bio-chemical properties and microbial communities in a Karst ecosystem. Eur J Soil Biol, 2012, 51: 1-7.