Non-use value assessment for wetland ecosystem service of Hongxing National Nature Reserve in northeast China

Xin Jin , Jianzhang Ma , Tijiu Cai , Xiaoxin Sun

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 1435 -1442.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 1435 -1442. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-016-0264-8
Original Paper

Non-use value assessment for wetland ecosystem service of Hongxing National Nature Reserve in northeast China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

By the contingent value method, we studied the non-use value of wetland ecosystem service of Hongxing National Nature Reserve (HNNR) in Heilongjiang Province, northeast China. The proportion of respondents willing to pay (WTP) for protection of HNNR was 63 %. The WTP ratio was affected by geographical area, contact nature, personal preferences, and familiar degree of the respondents. The WTP value was affected by age, education level and career of the respondents. The mainly reasons for people rejecting to pay for protecting HNNR were “I am not familiar to HNNR” and “I had no capacity for additional spending because of low income”. Weighted average individual WTP value was CNY 59.26 Yuan ind.−1 year−1 for all the respondents with WTP. The total non-use ecosystem service value of HNNR was CNY 1430 million Yuan in 2013. The heritage value was highest followed by existence value and option value. From the high ecosystem service value in HNNR, it is very important to construct nature reserve for protecting natural ecosystems and human sustainable use of natural resources.

Keywords

Ecosystem service / Non-use value / Hongxing National Nature Reserve / Xiaoxing’an Mountains

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xin Jin, Jianzhang Ma, Tijiu Cai, Xiaoxin Sun. Non-use value assessment for wetland ecosystem service of Hongxing National Nature Reserve in northeast China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2016, 27(6): 1435-1442 DOI:10.1007/s11676-016-0264-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Administration Bureau of Hongxing Natural Reserve (2007) Reports of the scientific investigation of Hongxing Natural Reserve in Heilongjiang Province, pp 17–72 (In Chinese)

[2]

Ao CL, Li YJ, Feng L, Jiao Y. Evaluating the non-use value of sanjiang wetland based on contigent valuation method. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(23): 6470-6477. (In Chinese)

[3]

Bateman IJ, Day BH, Georgiou S, Lake I. The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecol Econ, 2006, 60: 450-460.

[4]

Breffle WS, Eiswerth ME, Muralidharan D, Thornton J. Understanding how income influences willingness to pay for joint programs: a more equitable value measure for the less wealthy. Ecol Econ, 2015, 109: 17-25.

[5]

Cameron TA, Huppert DD. OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. J Environ Econ Manag, 1989, 17(3): 230-246.

[6]

Cao JH, Guo XP. Application of the Contingent Value Method in appraisal of environmental value of forest resources. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2002, 24(5): 645-648. (In Chinese)

[7]

Chen L, Ouyang ZY, Wang XK, Miao H, Duan XN. Applications of contingent valuation method in evaluation of non-market values. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26(2): 610-619. In Chinese)

[8]

Cui LJ (2000) Study on assessment of the environmental function and comprehensive mechanism of wetland, and case analysis. Doctoral Dissertation of Institute of Geography and Agroecology (Changchun), Chinese Academy of Sciences, pp 122–123 (In Chinese)

[9]

Cui LJ, Zhang MY. Valuation on Non-use Values of Zhalong Wetlands. Forest Res, 2006, 19(4): 491-496. (In Chinese)

[10]

Davis RK. Recreation planning as an economic problem. Nat Resour J, 1963, 3: 239-249.

[11]

Environmental Protection Department in Heilongjiang Province (2014) List of nature reserves in Heilongjiang Province. http://www.hljdep.gov.cn/hjgl/zrbh/zrbhq/2015/04/9002.html

[12]

Franzen A, Vogl D. Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: a comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environ Change, 2013, 23: 1001-1008.

[13]

Garrod GD, Willis KG. The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: a contingent ranking study. Ecol Econ, 1997, 21: 45-61.

[14]

Gustavson K, Kennedy E. Approaching Wetland Valuation in Canada. Wetlands, 2010, 30: 1065-1076.

[15]

Heilongjiang Statistical Yearbook 2014 (2014) Compiled by Heilongjiang Bureau of Statistics and Survey Office in Heilongjiang, National Bureau of Statistics of P.R.C. Beijing: China Statistics Press, pp 30–63 (In Chinese)

[16]

Huang LJ, Zhao CW. Non-market valuation of forest resources in Guiyang City of Guizhou Province based on comparative analysis of WTP and WTA. Chin J Ecol, 2011, 30(2): 327-334.

[17]

Huang L, Duan BL, Yuan ZW, Tian F, Bi J. Influencing factors analysis of willingness to pay for ecosystem services evaluation of Hongze Lake. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(2): 0487-0497. In Chinese)

[18]

Jacobsen JB, Hanley N. Are there income differences on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation?. Environ Resour Econ, 2009, 43(2): 137-160.

[19]

Jørgensen SL, Olsen SB, Ladenburg J, Martinsen L, Svenningsen SR, Hasler B. Spatially induced disparities in users’ and non-users’ WTP for water quality improvements—Testing the effect of multiple substitutes and distance decay. Ecol Econ, 2013, 92: 58-66.

[20]

Li WH. Theory, method and application of ecosystem service value assessment. 2008, Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 37 59 (In Chinese)

[21]

Li JM, Chen Q, Yao HY. Valuing the loss of ecological benefits from wetland reclamation in Jiaozhou Bay based on choice experiments. Resour Sci, 2015, 37(1): 68-75. (In Chinese)

[22]

Liu XT. Wetland of northeast China. 2005, Beijing: Science Press, 1 39 (In Chinese)

[23]

Liu XH (2009) Study on dynamic of ecosystem service of Sanjiang Plain wetland. Doctoral dissertation of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, pp 85–90 (In Chinese)

[24]

Loomis JB, Kent P, Strange L, Fausch K, Covich A. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol Econ, 2000, 33: 103-117.

[25]

Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG. Wetlands, 2000 3 New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 3 24

[26]

Pate J, Loomis J. The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecol Econ, 1997, 20: 199-207.

[27]

Rolfe J, Windle J. Distance decay functions for iconic assets: assessing national values to protect the health of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Environ Resour Econ, 2012, 53: 347-365.

[28]

Shen J, Saijo T. Reexamining the relations between socio-demographic characteristics and individual environmental concern: evidence from Shanghai data. J Environ Psychol, 2008, 28: 42-50.

[29]

Song LP, Li X, Song GH, Zhang CP, Li SH, Wang QB. Wetlands resource and their distribution in Hongxing Natural Reserve, Heilongjiang Province. Forest By-Product Spec China, 2009, 100: 89-90. (In Chinese)

[30]

Subade RF, Francisco HA. Do non-users value coral reefs? Economic valuation of conserving Tubbataha Reefs, Philippines. Ecol Econ, 2014, 102: 24-32.

[31]

Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environ Impact Ass Rev, 2004, 24: 89-124.

[32]

Voltaire L, Pirrone C, Bailly D. Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: a new approach. Ecol Econ, 2013, 88: 76-85.

[33]

Wang F (2012) Study on the value evaluation of Qilian Mountain nature reserve ecological asset. Doctoral Dissertation of Lanzhou University, pp 99–111 (In Chinese)

[34]

Wang FZ, Zhou ZX, Zheng ZM. Evaluation on service value of ecosystem of Peri-urban transition zone lake: a case study of Yandong Lake in Wuhan City. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 37(1): 1946-1954. (In Chinese)

[35]

Xu ZM, Zhang ZQ, Cheng GD, Su ZY, Lu AX, Lin Q, Zhang HT. Measuring the total economic value of restoring Ejina Banner’s ecosystem scervices. Acta Ecol Sin, 2002, 57(1): 107-116. (In Chinese)

[36]

Xu DW, Liu MQ, Li YW. A study on the contingent value assessment of ecosystem service of Yellow River Basin. Econ Sci, 2007, 6: 77-89. (In Chinese)

[37]

Yang K, Zhao J. Study on the ecosystem services value of urban river using contigent valueation method and bias analysis of the results. Acta Ecol Sin, 2005, 25(6): 1391-1396. (In Chinese)

[38]

Yang W, Chang J, Xu B, Peng CH, Ge Y. Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: a case study in Hangzhou, China. Ecol Econ, 2008, 68: 116-125.

[39]

Zhang ZQ, Xu ZM, Long AH, Gong ZT. Measuring the economic value of restoring ecosystem services in Zhangye City of Heihe River basin–Comparison and application of continuous and discrete contingent valuation survey. J Nat Resour, 2004, 19(2): 230-239. (In Chinese)

[40]

Zhao J (2005) Contingent valuation of ecosystem services: theory, methods and applications. Master Thesis of East China Normal University, pp 47–56 (In Chinese)

[41]

Zhu L, Chen Y, Gong HL, Jiang WG, Zhao WJ, Xiao YF. Economic value evaluation of wetland service in Yeyahu Wetland Nature Reserve, Beijing. Chin Geogr Sci, 2011, 21(6): 744-752.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

158

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/