Development of ecoregion-based merchantable volume systems for Pinus brutia Ten. and Pinus nigra Arnold. in southern Turkey

Abstract

Estimating individual tree volume is one of the essential building blocks in forest growth and yield models. Ecologically based taper equations provide accurate volume predictions and allow classification by merchantable sizes, assisting in sustainable forest management. In the present study, ecoregion-based compatible volume systems for brutian pine and black pine in the three ecoregions of southern Turkey were developed. Several well-known taper functions were evaluated. A second-order continuous-time autoregressive error structure was used to correct the inherent autocorrelation in the hierarchical data, allowing the model to be applied to irregularly spaced and unbalanced data. The compatible segmented model of Fang et al. (For Sci 46:1–12, 2000) best described the experimental data. It is therefore recommended for estimating diameter at a specific height, height to a specific diameter, merchantable volume, and total volume for the three ecoregions and two species analyzed. The nonlinear extra sum of squares method indicated differences in ecoregion and tree-specific taper functions. A different taper function should therefore be used for each pine species and ecoregion in southern Turkey. Using ecoregion-specific taper equations allows making more robust estimations and, therefore, will enhance the accuracy of diameter at different heights and volume predictions.

Keywords

Taper function / Segmented model / Brutian pine / Black pine / Ecoregion / Pinaceae

References

[1] Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transac Automat Control AC, 1974, 19: 716-723.

[2] Barrio M, Diéguez-Aranda U, Castedo-Dorado F, Álvarez JG, Kv Gadow. Merchantable volume system for pedunculate oak in northwestern Spain. Ann For Sci, 2007, 64: 511-520.

[3] Bates DM, Watts DG. Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. 1988, New York: Wiley

[4] Belsey DA. Conditioning diagnostics, collinearity and weak data in regression. 1991, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

[5] Bi H. Trigonometric variable-form taper equations for Australian eucalyptus. For Sci, 2000, 46: 397-409.

[6] Boydak M. Silvicultural characteristics and natural regeneration of Pinus brutia Ten.-a review. Plant Ecol, 2004, 171: 153-163.

[7] Brooks JR, Wiant HV (2007) Evaluating ecoregion-based height-diameter relationship of five economically important Appalachian hardwood species in West Virginia. In: McRoberts, R.E., Reams G.A., Van Deusen P.C., McWilliams W.H. (eds.) Proceeding of the seventh annual forest inventory and analysis symposium.3–6 2007, Portland

[8] Brooks JR, Wiant HR. Ecoregion-based local volume equations for appalachian hardwoods. North J Appl For, 2008, 25: 87-92.

[9] Brooks JR, Jiang L, Özçelik R. Compatible stem volume and taper equations for Brutian pine, Cedar of Lebanon, and Cilicica fir in Turkey. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 256: 147-152.

[10] Bruce R, Curtis L, van Coevering C. Development of a system of taper and volume tables for red alder. For Sci, 1968, 14: 339-350.

[11] Burkhart HE. Cubic-foot volume of loblolly pine to any merchantable top limit. South J Appl For, 1977, 1: 7-9.

[12] Cao QV, Burkhart HE, Max TA. Evaluations of two methods for cubic-foot volume prediction of loblolly pine to any merchantable limit. For Sci, 1980, 26: 71-80.

[13] Castedo F, Barrio M, Parresol BR, Álvarez JG. A stochastic height–diameter model for maritime pine ecoregions in Galicia (northwestern Spain). Ann For Sci, 2005, 62: 455-465.

[14] Clutter JL. Development of taper functions from variable top merchantable volume equations. For Sci, 1980, 26: 117-120.

[15] Corral-Rivas JJ, Diéguez-Aranda U, Corral S, Castedo F. A merchantable volume system for major pine species in El Salto, Durango (Mexico). For Ecol Manage, 2007, 238: 118-129.

[16] Crecente-Campo F, Alboreca AR, Diéguez-Aranda U. A merchantable volume system for Pinus sylvestris L. in the major mountain ranges of Spain. Ann For Sci, 2009, 66: 1-12.

[17] Demaerschalk J. Converting volume equations to compatible taper equations. For Sci, 1972, 18: 241-245.

[18] de-Miguel S, Mehtatalo L, Shater Z, Kraid B, Pukkala T. Evaluating marginal and conditional predictions of taper models in the absence of calibration data. Can J For Res, 2012, 42: 1383-1394.

[19] Diéguez-Aranda U, Castedo F, Álvarez JG, Rojo A. Compatible taper function for Scots pine plantations in northwestern Spain. Can J For Res, 2006, 36: 1190-1205.

[20] Draper NR, Smith H. Applied regression analysis, 1998 3 New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

[21] Fang Z, Bailey RL. Compatible volume and taper models with coefficients for tropical species on Hainan Island in Southern China. For Sci, 1999, 45: 85-100.

[22] Fang Z, Borders BE, Bailey RL. Compatible volume-taper models for loblolly and slash pine based on a system with segmented-stem form factors. For Sci, 2000, 46: 1-12.

[23] Figueiredo-Filho A, Schaaf LB. Comparison between predicted volumes estimated by taper equations and true volumes obtained by the water displacement technique (xylometer). Can J For Res, 1999, 29: 451-461.

[24] Fonweban J, Gardiner B, Macdonald E, Auty D. Taper functions for scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) in northern Britain. Forestry, 2011, 84: 49-60.

[25] Fonweban J, Gardiner B, Auty D. Variable-top merchantable volume equations for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) in Northern Britain. Forestry, 2012, 85: 237-253.

[26] Fortin M, Schneider R, Saucier JP. Volume and error variance estimation using integrated stem taper models. For Sci, 2013, 59: 345-358.

[27] GDF Forest Resources. 2006, Ankara: The General Directorate of Forests 159 pp

[28] Gomat HY, Deleporte P, Moukini R, Mialounguila G, Ognouabi N, Saya AR, Vigneron P, Saint-Andre L. What factors influence the stem taper of Eucalyptus: growth, environmental conditions, and genetics?. Ann For Sci, 2011, 68: 109-120.

[29] Huang S (1994) Ecologically-based individual tree volume estimation for major Alberta tree species. Land and Forest Service, Technical Report Pub No T/288, Edmonton, Alberta

[30] Huang S, Titus SJ, Price D, Morgan D. Validation of ecoregion-based taper equations for White spruce in Alberta. For Chron, 1999, 75: 281-292.

[31] Huang S, Price D, Morgan D, Peck K. Kozak’s variable-exponent taper equation regionalized for white spruce in Alberta. West J Appl For, 2000, 15(2): 75-85.

[32] Husch B, Miller CI, Beers TW. Forest mensuration, 1982 3 Malabar: Krieger Publishing Company

[33] Jiang L, Brooks JR, Wang J. Compatible taper and volume equations for yellow-poplar in West Virginia. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 213: 399-409.

[34] Jordan L, Berenhaut K, Souter R, Daniels RF. Parsimonious and completely compatible taper, total and merchantable volume models. For Sci, 2005, 51: 578-584. (in Turkish)

[35] Kantarcı MD (1991) Akdeniz Bölgesi’nin Yetişme Ortamı Bölgesel Sınıflandırması, T.C. Tarım Orman ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Orman Genel Müdürlüğü Yayını, Sıra No: 668, Seri No: 64, Ankara, 150 sf (in Turkish)

[36] Klos RJ, Wang GG, Dang QL, East EW. Taper equations for five major commercial tree species in Manitoba, Canada. West J Appl For, 2007, 22: 163-170.

[37] Kozak A. A variable-exponent taper equation. Can J For Res, 1988, 18: 1363-1368.

[38] Kozak A. Effects of multicollinearity and autocorrelation on the variable-exponent taper functions. Can J For Res, 1997, 27: 619-629.

[39] Kozak A. My last words on taper functions. For Chron, 2004, 80: 507-515.

[40] Kozak A, Kozak RA. Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models?. Can J For Res, 2003, 33: 976-987.

[41] Kozak A, Smith JHG. Standards for evaluating taper estimating systems. For Chron, 1993, 69: 438-444.

[42] Kozak A, Munro D, Smith J. Taper functions and their application in forest inventory. For Chron, 1969, 45: 278-283.

[43] Larson PR. Stem form development of forest trees. For Sci Monogr, 1963, 5: 1-42.

[44] Li R, Weiskittel A. Comparison of model forms for estimating stem taper and volume in the primary conifer species of the North American Acadian Region. Ann For Sci, 2010, 67: 301-317.

[45] Li R, Weiskittel A, Dick AR, Kershaw JA, Seymour RS. Regional stem taper equations for eleven conifer species in the Acadian Region of North America: development and assessment. North J Appl For, 2012, 29: 5-14.

[46] Martin AJ. Testing volume equation accuracy with water displacement techniques. For Sci, 1984, 30: 41-50.

[47] Mathews JH. Numerical methods for mathematics, science, and engineering. 1987, London: Longman Higher Education 512 p

[48] Max TA, Burkhart HE. Segmented polynomial regression applied to taper equations. For Sci, 1976, 22: 283-289.

[49] Myers RH. Classical and modern regression with applications, 1990 2 Belmont: Duxbury Press

[50] Newnham R. A variable-form taper function. For Can Petawawa Natl For Inst Inf Rep, 1988, 18(11): 1363-1368.

[51] Newnham R. Variable-form taper functions for four Alberta tree species. Can J For Res, 1992, 22: 210-223.

[52] Özçelik R, Bal C. Effects of adding crown variables in stem taper and volume predictions for black pine. Turk J Agric For, 2013, 37: 231-242.

[53] Özçelik R, Brooks JR. Compatible volume and taper models for economically important tree species of Turkey. Ann For Sci, 2012, 69: 105-118.

[54] Özçelik R, Brooks JR, Jiang L. Modeling stem profile of Lebanon cedar, Brutian pine, and Cilicica fir in Southern Turkey using nonlinear mixed-effects models. Eur J For Res, 2011, 130: 613-621.

[55] Özçelik R, Yavuz H, Karatepe Y, Gürlevik N, Kırış R. Development of ecoregion-based height-diameter models for 3 economically important tree species of southern Turkey. Turk J Agric For, 2014, 38: 399-412.

[56] Pillsbury NH, McDonald PM, Simon V. Reliability of tanoak volume equations when applied to different areas. West J Appl For, 1995, 10: 72-78.

[57] Pompa-Garcia M, Corral-Rivas JJ, Hernandez-Diaz JC, Alvarez-Gonzalez JG. A system for calculating the merchantable volume of oak trees in the northwest of the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. J For Res, 2009, 20: 293-300.

[58] Rojo A, Perales X, Sánchez-Rodríguez F, Álvarez-González JG, Gadow KV. Stem taper functions for maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Galicia (Northwestern Spain). Eur J For Res, 2005, 124: 177-186.

[59] Sakıcı OE, Mısır N, Yavuz H, Mısır M. Stem taper functions for Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmulleriana in Turkey. Scand J For Res, 2008, 23: 522-533.

[60] SAS Institute Inc (2004) SAS/ETS^® 9.1 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

[61] Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat, 1978, 6(2): 461-464.

[62] Sharma M, Oderwald RG. Dimensionally compatible volume and taper equations. Can J For Res, 2001, 31: 797-803.

[63] Sharma M, Zhang SY. Variable-exponent taper equations for jack pine, black spruce, and balsam fir in eastern Canada. For Ecol Manage, 2004, 198: 39-53.

[64] Valentine HT, Gregoire TG. A switching model of bole taper. Can J For Res, 2001, 31: 1400-1409.

[65] West PW, Ratkowsky DA, Davis AW. Problems of hypothesis testing of regressions with multiple measurements from individual sampling units. For Ecol Manag, 1984, 7: 207-224.

[66] Yavuz H, Saraçoğlu N. Compatible and non-compatible stem taper equations for alder. Turk J Agric For, 1999, 5: 1275-1282.

[67] Zakrzewski WT. A mathematically tractable stem profile model for jack pine in Ontario. North J Appl For, 1999, 16: 138-143.

[68] Zakrzewski WT, MacFarlane DW. Regional stem profile model for cross-border comparisons of harvested Red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) in Ontario and Michigan. For Sci, 2006, 52: 468-475.

[69] Zhang L, Peng C, Huang S, Zhou X. Development and evaluation of ecoregion-based jack pine height-diameter models for Ontario. For Chron, 2002, 78: 530-538.