Forest structure and anthropogenic pressures in the Pachmarhi biosphere reserve of India

Abstract

A critical first step in establishing biosphere reserves—under the Man and Biosphere Programme of UNESCO—is to generate baseline information for future courses of action. The present study aims to assess the structure and composition of forests—along with anthropogenic pressures mounting on these forests in the buffer zone of one such biosphere reserves—the Pachmarhi biosphere reserve of India. The quadrat method was employed for sampling vegetation, and information on anthropogenic pressures was collected by conducting interviews with local people and forest officials and collecting it from secondary sources. A total of 39 tree species were sampled in 82 quadrats; of these 26 tree species were in standing stage, 25 in sapling, and 35 in seedling. Chloroxylon swietenia emerged as the most dominant tree species having highest importance value index, followed by Tectona grandis, Terminalia tomentosa, and Hardwickia binata. Nine tree species and their saplings, including Sterculia urens and Terminalia arjuna, were exploited so badly that they were only found in the seedlings stage. The unavailability of standing trees of 12 important tree species including Aegle marmelos and Phyllanthus emblica indicates the intensity and gravity of anthropogenic pressures on these important tree species. If the present anthropogenic pressure continues, which has inhibited the regeneration of several tree species, then substantial negative ecological and societal consequences can be expected.

Keywords

Pachmarhi biosphere reserve / Tropical forest / Forest composition / Forest structure / Regeneration / Anthropogenic pressures

References

[1] Armesto JJ, Pickett STA. Experiments on disturbance in old-field plant communities: impact on species richness and abundance. Ecology, 1985, 66: 230-240.

[2] Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science, 2006, 31(5783): 58-61.

[3] Clement CR, Junqueira AB. Between a pristine myth and an impoverished future. Biotropica, 2010, 42: 534-536.

[4] Duchok R, Kent K, Devi A, Khumbongmayum Paul A, Khan ML. Population structure and regeneration status of medicinal tree Illicium griffithii in relation to disturbance gradients in temperate broad-leaved forest of Arunachal Pradesh. Curr Sci, 2005, 89(4): 673-676.

[5] EPCO Pachmarhi biosphere reserve. 2001, Bhopal: Environmental Planning & Co-ordination Organization

[6] Haines HH. Descriptive list of trees, shrubs and economic herbs of the southern circle central provinces. 1916, Allahabad: Pioneer Press

[7] Jayson EA. An ecological survey at Satpura national park, Pachmarhi and Bori sanctuaries, Madhya Pradesh. Indian J For, 1990, 13(4): 288-294.

[8] Kala CP. Traditional ecological knowledge, sacred groves and conservation of biodiversity in the Pachmarhi biosphere reserve of India. J Environ Prot, 2011, 2(7): 967-973.

[9] Kala CP. Indigenous uses and sustainable harvesting of trees by local people in Pachmarhi biosphere reserve of India. Int J Med Aromat Plants, 2011, 1(2): 153-161.

[10] Kala CP. Traditional ecological knowledge and conservation of ethnobotanical species in buffer zone of Pachmarhi biosphere reserve. 2012, Madhya Pradesh: Indian Institute of Forest Management

[11] Kala CP. Harvesting and supply chain analysis of ethnobotanical species in the Pachmarhi biosphere reserve of India. Am J Environ Prot, 2013, 2: 20-27.

[12] Kala CP. Traditional ecological knowledge on characteristics, conservation and management of soil in tribal communities of Pachmarhi biosphere reserve, India. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2013, 13(1): 201-214.

[13] Kala CP, Dubey Y. Anthropogenic disturbances and status of forest and wildlife in the dry deciduous forests of Chhattisgarh state in India. J For Res, 2012, 2(1): 45-52.

[14] Karanth KK, Curran LM, Reuning-Scherer JD. Village size and forest disturbance in Bhadra wildlife sanctuary, Western Ghats, India. Biol Conserv, 2006, 128(2): 147-157.

[15] Majila BS, Kala CP. Forest structure and regeneration along the altitudinal gradient in the Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttarakhand, India. Russ J Ecol, 2010, 41(1): 75-83.

[16] McNeely JA. Lessons from the past: forests and biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv, 1994, 1: 3-20.

[17] Misra R. Ecology work book. 1968, New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Co

[18] Mitchell FJG, Kirby KJ. The impact of large herbivores on the conservation of semi-natural woods in the British uplands. Forestry, 1990, 6(4): 333-353.

[19] Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 2000, 40(6772): 853-858.

[20] Oommachan M, Bajaj A, Masih SK. Ethnobotanical observations at Pachmarhi Madhya Pardesh. J Trop For, 1990, 2: 157-161.

[21] Prasad R, Kotwal PC, Mishra M. Impact of harvesting of Emblica officinalis (Aonla) on its natural regeneration in central Indian forests. J Sustainable For, 2001, 14(4): 1-12.

[22] Rapport DJ, Costanza R, McMichael AJ. Assessing ecosystem health. Trends Ecol Evol, 1998, 13(10): 397-402.

[23] Richards PW. The tropical rainforest: an ecological study. 1996, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[24] Roy GP, Shukla BK, Datta B. Flora of Madhya Pradesh. 1992, New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House

[25] Somanathan H, Borges RM. Influence of exploitation on population structure, plant spacing and reproductive success in dioecious tree species within a fragmented cloud forest in India. Biol Conserv, 2000, 94: 243-256.

[26] Witt DO. Descriptive list of trees, shrubs, climbers and economic herbs of the northern and berar forest circles central Provinces. 1916, Allahabad: Pioneer Press