Non-structural carbohydrate levels of three co-occurring understory plants and their responses to forest thinning by gap creation in a dense pine plantation

Abstract

We investigated non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) levels and components (starch, glucose, fructose and sucrose) in the leaves of three typical co-occurring forest-floor plants, moss Eurhynchium savatieri (ES), fern Parathelypteris nipponica (PN) and forb Aruncus sylvester (AS) in a 30-year-old Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) plantation forest on the eastern Tibetan Plateau. We also explored their responses to three gap creation treatments (control and two gap creations of 80 and 110 m²) based on NSC levels. PN had the highest leaf NSC level of the three plants, with AS second and ES lowest. Starch was the predominant component of NSC and the contents of glucose were higher than those of fructose or sucrose for all three species. The NSC level of ES in intermediate gaps was significantly higher than at control sites. PN also had higher NSC levels in both small and intermediate gaps than in control sites. But the differences between treatments were not obvious for AS. Our results suggest that ES and PN benefit from gap formation while the two species have different NSC response sensitivities to gap size, but the leaf NSC level of AS is less sensitive to the disturbance.

Keywords

Forest-floor plant / Gap thinning / Light radiation / Moss / Non-structural carbohydrates

References

[1] Baninasab B, Rahemi M. Possible role of non-structural carbohydrates in alternate bearing of pistachio. Eur J Hortic Sci, 2006, 71: 277-282.

[2] Gabriel R, Bates JW. Responses of photosynthesis to irradiance in bryophytes of the Azores laurel forest. J Bryol, 2003, 25: 101-105.

[3] Glime JM. 2007. Vol. 1. Physiological Ecology. Chapter 6 Limiting factors and limits of tolerance. Bryophyte Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Accessed on 16 August 2010 at http://www.bryoecol.mtu.edu/

[4] Jiang Y, Pang X, Bao W. Soil microbial biomass and the influencing factors under Pinus tabulaeformis and Picea asperata plantations in the upper Minjiang River. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31: 801-811. (In Chinese)

[5] Kariuki M, Kooyman RM, Smith RGB, Wardell-Johnson G, Vanclay JK. Regeneration changes in tree species abundance, diversity and structure in logged and unlogged subtropical rainforest over a 36-Year period. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 236: 162-176.

[6] Kasai M. Regulation of leaf photosynthetic rate correlating with leaf carbohydrate status and activation state of rubisco under a variety of photosynthetic source/sink balances. Physiol Plant, 2008, 134: 216-226.

[7] Körner C. Carbon limitation in trees. J Ecol, 2003, 91: 4-17.

[8] Kuptz D, Grams TEE, Gunter S. Light acclimation of four native tree species in felling gaps within a tropical mountain rainforest. Trees, 2010, 24: 117-127.

[9] Li MH, Xiao WF, Shi PL, Wang SG, Zhong YD, Liu XL, Wang XD, Cai XH, Shi ZM. Nitrogen and carbon source-sink relationships in trees at the Himalayan treelines compared with lower elevations. Plant, Cell Environ, 2008, 31: 1377-1387.

[10] Marschall M, Proctor MCF. Are bryophytes shade plants? Photosynthetic light responses and proportions of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total carotenoids. Ann Bot, 2004, 94: 593-603.

[11] Milakovsky B, Frey BR, Ashton MS, Larson BC, Schmitz OJ. Influences of gap position, vegetation management and herbivore control on survival and growth of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) Seedlings. Forest Ecol Manag, 2011, 261: 440-446.

[12] Montgomery R, Chazdon R. Light gradient partitioning by tropical tree seedlings in the absence of canopy gaps. Oecologia, 2002, 131: 165-174.

[13] Palacio S, Maestro M, Montserratmarti G. Seasonal dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in two species of mediterranean sub-shrubs with different leaf phenology. Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 59: 34-42.

[14] Palacio S, Milla R, Albuixech J, Pérez-Rontomé C, Camarero JJ, Maestro M, Montserrat-Martí G. Seasonal variability of dry matter content and its relationship with shoot growth and nonstructural carbohydrates. New Phytol, 2008, 180: 133-142.

[15] Paul MJ, Foyer CH. Sink regulation of photosynthesis. J Exp Bot, 2001, 52: 1383-1400.

[16] Rambo TR, North MP. Canopy microclimate response to pattern and density of thinning in a Sierra Nevada forest. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 257: 435-442.

[17] Sun YA, Wang GQ, Zhang YJ, Yan KY. Determination of the water-soluble carbohydrates in tobacco by Hplc-Elsd. Fenxi Kexue Xuebao, 2004, 20: 531-533. (in Chinese)

[18] Waite M, Sack L. How does moss photosynthesis relate to leaf and canopy structure? Trait relationships for 10 Hawaiian species of contrasting light habitats. New Phytol, 2010, 185: 156-172.

[19] Wurth MK, Pelaez-Riedl S, Wright SJ, Korner C. Non-structural carbohydrate pools in a tropical forest. Oecologia, 2005, 143: 11-24.

[20] Zhang M, Zhu JJ, Li MC, Zhang GQ, Yan QL. Different light acclimation strategies of two coexisting tree species seedlings in a temperate secondary forest along five natural light levels. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 305: 234-242.

[21] Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR. Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2010, 61: 235-261.