Carbon stock and rate of carbon sequestration in Dipterocarpus forests of Manipur, Northeast India

L. Supriya Devi , P. S. Yadava

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) : 315 -322.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) : 315 -322. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-015-0070-8
Original Paper

Carbon stock and rate of carbon sequestration in Dipterocarpus forests of Manipur, Northeast India

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

We examined the carbon stock and rate of carbon sequestration in a tropical deciduous forest dominated by Dipterocarpus tuberculatus in Manipur, North East India. Estimation of aboveground biomass was determined by harvest method and multiplied with density of tree species. The aboveground biomass was between 18.27–21.922 t ha−1 and the carbon stock ranged from 9.13 to 10.96 t C ha−1 across forest stands. Aboveground biomass and carbon stock increased with the increase in tree girth. The rate of carbon sequestration varied from 1.4722 to 4.64136 t ha−1 year−1 among the dominant tree species in forest stands in tropical deciduous forest area. The rate of carbon sequestration depends on species composition, the density of large trees in different girth classes, and anthropogenic disturbances in the present forest ecosystem. Further work is required to identify tree species having the highest potential to sequester CO2 from the atmosphere, which could lead to recommendations for tree plantations in a degraded ecosystem.

Keywords

Carbon budget / Carbon sequestration / Dipterocarpus / Biomass / Net production

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
L. Supriya Devi, P. S. Yadava. Carbon stock and rate of carbon sequestration in Dipterocarpus forests of Manipur, Northeast India. Journal of Forestry Research, 2015, 26(2): 315-322 DOI:10.1007/s11676-015-0070-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Arts WH, Marks PI (1971) A summary table of biomass and net annual primary production in forest biomass studies. In: Young HE (ed) Life sciences and agricultural experiment station, Univ. Maine, Orono, pp 3–32

[2]

Bousquet P, Peylin P, Ciais P, Quere CL, Friedlingstein P, Tans PP. Regional changes in carbon dioxide fluxes of land and oceans since 1980. Science, 2000, 290: 1342-1346.

[3]

Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests. FAO Forestry Paper 134. A forest resources assessment publication, Rome, p 1

[4]

Brown S, Lugo AE. Biomass of tropical forest: a new estimates based on forest volumes. Science, 1984, 223: 1290-1293.

[5]

Brown S, Masera Sathaye OJ. Watson R, Noble I, Verardo D. Project based activities. Land use, land use Change and forestry. 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 283 338

[6]

Brown S, Sathaye J, Cannel M, Kauppi P. Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH. Management of forest mitigation of green house gas emissions, Chapter 24. Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses. Contribution of working group II to the second assessment report of the IPCC. 1996, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 775 797

[7]

Burkhart HE, Strud MR (1973) Dry weight yield estimation for loblolly pine: a comparison of two techniques. In: IUFRO biomass studies, Univ. Maine, Crona, Maine, pp 27–40

[8]

Champion HG, Seth SK. The forest type of India. 1968, Delhipp: The manager publications 35

[9]

Debajit R, Nepolion B, Ashesh KD. Assessment of aboveground and soil organic carbon stocks in Dipterocarpus forests of Barak Valley, Assam, Northeast India. Int J Ecol Environ Sci, 2014, 40(1): 15-28.

[10]

Devi SL, Yadava PS. Floristic diversity assessment and vegetation analysis of tropical semievergreen forest of Manipur NE India. Trop Ecol, 2006, 47(1): 89-98.

[11]

Golley FB, Odum HT, Wilson RF. The structure and metabolism of a Puerto Recan red mangrove forest in May. Ecology, 1962, 43: 9-19.

[12]

Kawahara KT, Kanazama Y, Sakurai S. Biomass and net production of the man made forests in Philippines. J Jpn For Soc, 1981, 63(9): 320-327.

[13]

Kawanabe S. Shidie T, Kira T. A sub-tropical broad leaf forest of Yona, Okinawa. Primary productivity of terrestrial communities. 1977, Tokyo: Tokyo Univ., 268 279

[14]

Khun V, Lee DK, Hyun OJ, Park YD, Combalicer MS. Carbon storage of Dipterocarpus tuberculatus, Terminalia tomentosa and Pentacme siamensis in Seima protection forest, Cambodia. J Environ Sci Manag Spec Issue, 2012, 1: 68-76.

[15]

Lasco RD, Pulhin FB. Philippine forest ecosystem and climate changes: carbon stock, rate of sequestration and Kyoto protocol. Annu Trop Res, 2003, 25(2): 37-51.

[16]

Lasco RD, MacDicken KG, Pulhin FB, Guillermo IQ, Sales RF, Cruz RVO. Carbon stock assessment of selectively logged Dipterocarpus forest and wood processing mills in the Philippines. J Trop For Sci, 2006, 18 4 212.

[17]

Lim MT, Mohd BH. Biomass accumulation in naturally regenerating lowland secondary forest and an Acacia mangium stand in Sarawak. Pertanika, 1985, 8(2): 237-242.

[18]

Makundi W, Razali W, Jones DJ, Pinso C. Tropical forests in the Kyoto protocol. Trop For Update, 1998, 8(4): 5-8.

[19]

Manhas RK, Negi JDS, Rajesh K, Chauhan PS. Temporal assessment of growing stock, biomass and carbon stock of Indian forests. Clim Chang, 2006, 74(1–3): 191-221.

[20]

Miah M, Danesh M, Shin MY, Koike M, et al. Miah M, Danesh M, et al. Carbon sequestration in forest of Bangladesh. Forest to climate change mitigation. 2011, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 51 79

[21]

Misra R, Singh JS, Singh KP. Preliminary observation on the production of dry matter by sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn F.). Trop Ecol, 1967, 8: 94-104.

[22]

Newbould PJ. Methods of estimating the primary production of forests. 1967, Oxford and Edinburgh: Black Well Scientific Publications

[23]

Ngo KM, Turner BL, Muller-Landau HC, Davies SJ, Larjavaara M, Hassan NFBN, Lum S. Carbon stocks in primary and secondary tropical forests in Singapore. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 296: 81-89.

[24]

Racelis EL (2000) Carbon stock assessment of Large leaf Mahogany and Dipterocarp plantations in the Mt Makiling forest reserve. Master’s Thesis, University of Philippines, Los Banos. College, Laguna, Philippines

[25]

Singh EJ, Yadava PS. Structure and function of Oak forest ecosystem of north eastern India: I biomass dynamics and net primary production. Oecol Mont, 1994, 3: 1-9.

[26]

Singh L, Singh KP, Singh JS. Singh KP, Singh JS. Biomass productivity and nutrient cycling in four contrasting forest ecosystem of India. Tropical ecosystem, ecology and management. 1992, New York: Wiley Eastern Limited, 415 430

[27]

TBFRA (2000) Forest resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand (industrialized temperate/boreal countries). In: UN-ECE/FAO contributions to global forest resources assessment, New York, pp 155–171

[28]

Thokchom A, Yadava PS. Biomass and carbon stock assessment in the sub-tropical forests of Manipur, North East India. Int J Ecol Environ Sci, 2013, 39(2): 107-113.

[29]

Tipper R. Update on carbon offsets. Trop For Update, 1998, 8(1): 2-4.

[30]

Whittaker RH, Woodwell GM. Structure, production and diversity of Oak-Pine forest at Brook Haven, New York. J Ecol, 1969, 57: 155-174.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

166

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/