Optimizing any-aged management of mixed boreal forest under residual basal area constraints

Abstract

The current trend of forest management in many countries is reduced use of clear-felling and planting, and increased use of continuous cover management. In Finland, the new forest act of 2014 made all types of cuttings equally allowable on the condition that if the post-cutting residual stand basal area is too low, the stand must be regenerated within certain time frame. Forest landowner can freely choose between even- and uneven-aged management. This study developed a method for optimizing the timing and type of cuttings without the need to categorize the management system as either even-aged or uneven-aged. A management system that does not set any requirements on the sequence of post-cutting diameter distributions is called any-aged management. Planting or sowing was used when stand basal area fell below the required minimum basal area and the amount of advance regeneration was less than required in the regulations. When the cuttings of 200 stands managed earlier with even-aged silviculture were optimized with the developed system, final felling followed by artificial regeneration was selected for almost 50% of stands. Reduction of the minimum basal area limit greatly decreased the use of artificial regeneration but improved profitability, suggesting that the truly optimal management would be to use natural regeneration in financially mature stands. The optimal type of thinning was high thinning in 97–99 % of cases. It was calculated that the minimum basal area requirement reduced the mean net present value of the stands by 12–16 % when discount rate was 3–5 %.

Keywords

any-aged silviculture / artificial regeneration / continuous cover forestry / optimal management / uneven-aged management

References

[1] Adams DM, Ek AR. Optimizing the management of uneven-aged stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1974, 4: 274-287.

[2] Anonym. 2013. Laki metsälain muuttamisesta. Available at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2013/20131085#Pid173152

[3] Bayer H-G, Schwefel H-P. Evolution strategies. A comprehensive introduction. Natural Computing, 2002, 1: 3-52.

[4] Chang SJ, Gadow Kv. Application of the generalized Faustmann model to uneven-aged forest management. Journal of Forest Economics, 2010, 16: 313-325.

[5] Eerikäinen K, Miina J, Valkonen S. Models for the regeneration establishment and the development of established seedlings in uneven-aged, Norway spruce dominated stands of southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 242: 444-461.

[6] Haight RG. A comparison of dynamic and static economic models of uneven-aged stand management. Forest Science, 1985, 31(4): 957-974.

[7] Haigh RG, Brodie JD, Dahms WG. A dynamic programming algorithm for optimization of lodgepole pine management. Forest Science, 1985, 31: 321-330.

[8] Haight RG, Getz WM. Fixed and Equilibrium Endpoint Problems in Uneven-Aged Stand Management. Forest Science, 1987, 33: 908-931.

[9] Haight RG, Monserud RA. Optimizing any-aged management of mixed-species stands. I. Performance of a coordinate search process. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1990, 20(1): 15-25.

[10] Haight RG, Monserud RA. Optimizing any-aged management of mixed-species stands. II. Effects of decision criteria. Forest Science, 1990, 36: 125-144.

[11] Hooke R, Jeeves TA. “Direct search” solution of numerical and statistical problems. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 1961, 8: 212-229.

[12] Hyytiäinen K, Tahvonen O. The effects of legal limits and recommendations on timber production: the case of Finland. Forest Science, 2001, 47: 443-454.

[13] Hyytiäinen K, Tahvonen O. Economics of forest thinnings and rotation periods for Finnish conifer cultures. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2002, 17: 274-288.

[14] Hyytiäinen K, Tahvonen O, Valsta L. Optimum juvenile density, harvesting and stand structure in even-aged Scots pine stands. Forest Science, 2005, 51: 120-133.

[15] Hyytiäinen K, Haight RG. Pukkala T, Gadow K. Optimizing continuous cover forest management. Continuous Cover Forestry, 2012 195 227

[16] Knoke T. Pukkala T, Gadow K. The economics of continuous cover forestry. Continuous Cover Forestry, 2012 167 193

[17] Kuuluvainen T, Tahvonen O, Aakala T. Even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in boreal Fennoscandia: a review. Ambio, 2012, 41(7): 720-737.

[18] Laasasenaho J. Taper curve and volume equations for pine spruce and birch. Communications Instuti Forestalis Fenniae, 1982, 108: 1-74.

[19] Laiho O, Lähde E, Pukkala T. Uneven- vs. even-aged management in Finnish boreal forests. Forestry, 2011, 84(5): 547-556.

[20] Malinen J, Kilpeläinen H, Piira T, Redsven V, Wall T, Nuutinen T. Comparing model-based approaches with bucking simulation-based approach in the prediction of timber assortment recovery. Forestry, 2007, 80(3): 309-321.

[21] Mehtätalo L. Valtakunnalliset puukohtaiset tukkivähennysmallit männylle, kuuselle, koivulle ja haavalle. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja, 2002, 4/2002: 575-591.

[22] Miina J, Saksa T. Predicting regeneration establishment in Norway spruce plantations using a multivariate multilevel model. New Forests, 2006, 32: 265-283.

[23] Miina J, Saksa T. Predicting establishment of tree seedlings for evaluating methods of regeneration for Pinus sylvestris. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2008, 23(1): 12-27.

[24] Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal, 1965, 7: 308-313.

[25] Pukkala T, Miina J, Kurttila M, Kolström T. A spatial yield model for optimizing the thinning regime of mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 1998, 13: 31-42.

[26] Pukkala T. Metsikön tuottoarvon ennustemallit kivennäismaan männiköille, kuusikoille ja rauduskoivikoillle. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja, 2005, 3/2005: 311-322.

[27] Pukkala T. Population-based methods in the optimization of stand management. Silva Fennica, 2009, 43(2): 261-274.

[28] Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. Growth and yield models for uneven-sized forest stands in Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 258: 207-216.

[29] Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. Optimizing the structure and management of uneven-sized stands in Finland. Forestry, 2010, 83(2): 129-142.

[30] Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. Pukkala T, Gadow K. Continuous cover forestry in Finland — Recent research results. Continuous Cover Forestry, 2012 85 128

[31] Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. Species interactions in the dynamics of even- and uneven-aged boreal forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2013, 32(4): 371-403.

[32] Tahvonen O, Pukkala T, Laiho O, Lähde E, Niinimäki S. Optimal management of uneven-aged Norway spruce stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 260: 106-115.

[33] Tahvonen O. Optimal structure and development of uneven-aged Norway spruce forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2011, 41: 2389-2402.

[34] Valsta L. A scenario approach to stochastic anticipatory optimization in stand management. Forest Science, 1992, 38(2): 430-447.