Temporal patterns of storage and flux of N and P in young Teak plantations of tropical moist deciduous forest, India

Abstract

Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) ranks among the top five tropical hardwood species and is being promoted for use in plantations in its non-native range due to its high economic value. However, there is a general lack of data on ecosystem functioning of teak plantations. We aimed at understanding storage and flux of nutrients related to young plantations of teak. Cycling of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in a chronosequence of plantations (1, 5, 11, 18, 24 and 30 years) was studied in the Moist Deciduous Forest Region of North India with the objective of investigating the nutrient cycling pattern at younger age since the current trend of harvesting age of the species in several tropical countries is being drastically reduced for quick return from this high value crop. Standing state, nutrient uptake, nutrient return and nutrient retranslocation in these plantations were estimated by tree harvesting and chemical analysis methods. The range of total standing nutrient across all these plantations was 20.3 to 586.6 kg·ha⁻¹ for N and 5.3 to 208.8 kg·ha⁻¹ for P. Net uptake of N ranged from 19.4 to 88.9 kg·ha⁻¹·a⁻¹ and P from 3.8 to 18.1 kg·ha⁻¹·a⁻¹. Retranslocation of N and P among all the stands ranged from 8.7 to 48.0 kg·ha⁻¹·a⁻¹ and 0.01 to 3.5 kg·ha⁻¹·a⁻¹, respectively. Range of total nutrient return was 25.8 to 91.3 kg·ha⁻¹·a⁻¹ for N and 2.7 to 10.1 kg·ha⁻¹·a⁻¹ for P. N and P use efficiency was between 107.4 and 192.5 g dry organic matter (OM) g⁻¹ N, and 551.9 and 841.1 g OM g⁻¹ P, respectively. The turnover time ranged from 2.04–13.17 years for N and between 2.40–22.66 years for P. Quantity of N and P in the soil nutrient pool ranged from 2566.8 to 4426.8 kg·ha⁻¹ and 372 to 520 kg·ha⁻¹, respectively. Storage and flux of components in different plant parts of different aged plantations were assessed and depicted in compartment models. Percentage storage in soil, litter and vegetation ranged from 82% to 99%, 0.6% to 2.4% and 0.5% to 15% for N, respectively, and from 63% to 98%, 0.5% to 2% and 1% to 35% for P, respectively. This information could be useful in managing external nutrient manipulation to crops of different ages for optimum biomass production or carbon sequestration.

Keywords

nutrient uptake / standing state / return / turnover time / nutrient use efficiency / compartment model / harvest loss / Tectona grandis

References

[1] Adu-Anning C, Blay DJ. Ensuring sustainable harvesting of wood: impact of biomass harvesting on the nutrient stores of teak woodlot stand in the Sudan savanna. Ghana Journal of Forestry, 2001, 10: 17-24.

[2] Awotoye OO, Ogunkunle CO, Adeniyi SA. Assessment of soil quality under various land use practices in a humid agro-ecological zone of Nigeria. African Journal of Plant Science, 2011, 5(10): 565-569.

[3] Balooni K. Teak investment programmes: an Indian perspective. Unasylva, 2000, 51: 22-28.

[4] Bargali SS. Structure and functioning of Eucalyptus plantations in Tarai belt of Kumaun Himalaya. 1990, Nainital, India: Kumaun University

[5] Bargali SS, Singh RP, Singh SP. Structure and function of an age series Eucalypt plantations in Central Himalaya. II. Nutrient Dynamics. Annals of Botany, 1992, 69(5): 413-421.

[6] Boreman FH, Likens GE. Patterns and process in a forested ecosystem. 1979, New York: Springer, 272

[7] Champion HG, Seth SK. A revised survey of the forest types of India. 1968, New Delhi: Manager of Publication, Government of India

[8] Chapin FS, Kedrowski RA. Seasonal changes in nitrogen and phosphorus fractions and autumn retranslocation in evergreen and deciduous taiga trees. Ecology, 1983, 64(2): 376-391.

[9] Chapin RS. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 1980, 11: 233-260.

[10] Charley JR, Richards BN. Lang OL, Nobel PS, Osmund CB, Zeigler M. Nutrient allocation in plant communities, mineral cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Physiological Plant Ecology. 1983, Berlin: Springer, 5 45

[11] Chaturvedi OP, Singh JS. The structure and function of pine forest in Central Himalaya. II. Nutrient dynamics. Annals of Botany, 1987, 60: 253-267.

[12] Chen H. Biomass and nutrient distribution in a Chinese fir plantation chronosequence in Southwest Hunan, China. Forest Ecology and Management, 1998, 105: 209-216.

[13] Choompol N. The distribution and development of teak root in different age plantations. Forest Research Bulletin, 1973, 28 63.

[14] Deans JD, Diagne O, Lindley DK, Dion M, Parkinson JA. Nutrient and organic matter accumulation in Acacia senegal fallows over 18 years. Forest Ecology and Management, 1999, 124: 153-167.

[15] Faruqui O. Organic and mineral structure and productivity of plantation of Sal (Shorea robusta) and Teak (Tectona grandis). 1972, Varanasi, India: Banaras Hindu University

[16] Fife DN, Nambiar EKS. Changes in the canopy and growth of Pinus radiata in response to nitrogen supply. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997, 93: 137-152.

[17] George M, Verghese G. Nutrient cycling in Eucalyptus globulus plantation. III. Nutrient retained, returned, uptake and nutrient cycling. Indian Forester, 1991, 117: 110-116.

[18] George M, Verghese G. Nutrient cycling in Tectona grandis plantation. Journal of Tropical Forestry, 1992, 8: 127-133.

[19] Golley FB, Mc Ginnis JT, Clemants RG, Child GI, Duever MJ. Mineral cycling in a tropical moist forest ecosystem. 1975, Athens, USA: University of Georgia Press, 248.

[20] Harrison RB, Reis GG, Reis MDGF, Bernardo AL, Firme DJ. Effect of spacing and age on nitrogen and phosphorus distribution in biomass of Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Eucalyptus pellita and Eucalyptus urophylla plantations in southeastern Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 133: 167-177.

[21] Harper JL. The population biology of plants. 1977, London: Academic Press, 892.

[22] Hase H, Foelster H. Impact of plantation forestry with teak (Tectona grandis) on the nutrient status of young alluvial soils of West Venezuela. Forest Ecology and Management, 1983, 6: 33-57.

[23] Hiremath AJ, Ewel JJ, Cole TG. Nutrient use efficiency in three fast-growing tropical trees. Forest Science, 2002, 48: 662-672.

[24] Hirose T. Relations between turnover rate, resource utility, and structure of some plant populations: A study in the matter budgets. Journal of the Faculty of Science University of Tokyo, Section III: Botany, 1975, 11: 355-407.

[25] Hopman P, Stewart HTL, Finn DW. Imapcts of harvesting on nutrients in a eucalypt ecosystem in southeastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management, 1993, 59: 29-51.

[26] Ingerslev M. Above ground biomass and nutrient distribution in a limed and fertilized norway spruce (Picea abies) plantation. Part I. Nutrient concentration. Forest Ecology and Management, 1999, 119: 13-20.

[27] Iwatsubo G. Kato T, Nakao S, Umesao T. Circulation of plant nutrients in forest ecosystems on the role of rain water in the circulation. Mountains, Forests and Ecology. 1976, Tokyo: Chuo — Koron — Sha, 313 360

[28] Jackson ML. Chemical Analysis. 1958, USA: Prentice Hall Inc, 930.

[29] Jha KK. Structure and functioning of an age series of teak (Tectona grandis Linn.) plantations of Kumaun Himalayan Tarai. 1995, Nainital, India: Kuman University

[30] Jha KK, Chhimwal CB. Performance of different provenances of Eucalyptus camaldulensis in Tarai and its effect on soil properties. Indian Journal of Forestry, 1993, 16: 97-102.

[31] Jha KK, Singh JS. Temporal patterns of bole volume and biomass of young teak plantations raised in moist deciduous forest region, India. International Journal of Ecology Environment and Science, 1999, 25: 177-184.

[32] Jordan CF, Caskey W, Ecalasite G, Herrara R, Montagini F, Todd R, Uhl C. The nitrogen cycling in a terrafirme rain forest on oxisol in the Amazon territory of Venezuela. Plant and Soil, 1982, 67: 325-332.

[33] Karmacharya SB, Singh KP. Production and nutrient dynamics of reproductive components of teak trees in dry tropics. Tree Physiology, 1992, 11: 357-368.

[34] Kimmins JP. Forest Ecology: A foundation for sustainable management. 1997, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 596.

[35] Krishnapillay B. Silviculture and management of teak plantations. Unasylva, 2000, 51: 14-21.

[36] Kumar BM, George SJ, Jamaludheen V, Suresh TK. Comparison of biomass production, tree allometry and nutrient use efficiency of multipurpose trees grown in woodlot and silvipastoral experiments in Kerala, India. Forest Ecology and Management, 1998, 112: 145-163.

[37] Kumar JIN, Kumar RN, Bhoi RK, Sajish PK. Quantification of nutrient content in the above ground biomass of teak plantation in tropical dry deciduous forests of Udaipur, India. Journal of Forest Science, 2009, 55: 251-256.

[38] Kumar S, Sharma AK. Numerical classification of some soils of Indian Tarai. Indian Society of Soil Science, 1990, 38: 265-271.

[39] Li X. Nutrient cycling in a Chinese fir (Cunnighamia lanceolata) stand on a poor site in Yishan, Guangji. Forest Ecology and Management, 1996, 89: 115-123.

[40] Lodhiyal L, Singh RP, Singh SP. Structure and function of an age series of poplar plantations in central Himalaya. II Nutrient dynamics. Annals of Botany, 1995, 76: 201-210.

[41] Lodhiyal N, Lodhiyal LS. Aspects of nutrient cycling and nutrient use pattern of Bhabar Shisham forests in central Himalaya, India. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 176: 237-252.

[42] Lodhiyal N, Lodhiyal LS, Pangtey YPS. Structure and function of Shisham forests in central Himalaya, India: Nutrient Dynamics. Annals of Botany, 2002, 89: 55-65.

[43] Medina E. Morris DR. Ecology of tropical American Savannas: An ecophysiological approach. Human ecology in savanna environment. 1980, London: Academic Press, 297 319

[44] Meentemyer V, Box EO, Thompson R. World pattern and amounts of terrestrial plant litter production. Bioscience, 1982, 32: 125-128.

[45] Mishra BP. Vegetation composition and nutrient status from polyculture to monoculture. African Journal of Environment Science and Technology, 2011, 5: 363-366.

[46] Mishra RK, Turnbul CRA, Cromer RN, Gibbons AK, Lasala AV, Ballard LM. Below and above ground growth of Eucalyptus nitens in a young plantation. II. Nitrogen and phosphorus. Forest Ecology and Management, 1998, 106: 295-306.

[47] Nandi AK, Basu PK, Banerjee SK. Modification of some soil properties by Eucalyptus species. Indian Forester, 1991, 117: 53-57.

[48] Negi MS, Tandon VN, Rawat HS. Biomass and nutrient distribution in young teak (Tectona grandis Linn. F.) plantations in Tarai region of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Forester, 1995, 121: 455-464.

[49] Ovington JD. Mineral contents of plantations of Pinus sylvestris L. Annals of Botany, 1959, 23: 73-88.

[50] Ovington JD. Eckardt FE. Some factors affecting nutrient distribution within ecosystems. Functioning of terrestrial ecosystems of primary production level. 1968, Paris: UNESCO, 95 105

[51] Pandey D, Brown S. Teak: a global overview. Unasylva, 2000, 51: 1-14.

[52] Pandey ON. Cycling of nitrogen, phosphorus and pottasium in the soil vegetation systems of tropical dry deciduous forest of Chandraprabha region. 1980, Varanasi, India: Banaras Hindu University

[53] Peri PL, Gargalione V, Pastur GM. Dynamics of above and below ground biomass and nutrient accumulation in an age sequence of Nothophagus antarctica of southern Potagonia. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 233: 85-99.

[54] Ralhan PK, Singh JS. Dynamics of nutrients and leaf mass in central Himalayan forest trees and shrubs. Ecology, 1987, 68: 1974-1983.

[55] Ranger J, Colin-Benard M. Nutrient Dynamics of chestnut tree (Castenea sativa Mill.) coppice stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 1996, 86: 259-277.

[56] Rawat JK, Tandon VN. Biomass production and mineral cycling in young chir pine plantations in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Forester, 1993, 119: 977-985.

[57] Rawat YS, Singh JS. Structure and function of oak forests in central Himalaya. II. Nutrient Dynamics. Annals of Botany, 1988, 62: 397-411.

[58] Regina S. Biomass estimation and nutrient pools in four Quercus pyrenaica in Siera de Gata Mountains, Salamanca, Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 132: 127-141.

[59] Rodin LE, Bazilevich NI. Production and mineral cycling in terrestrial vegetation. 1967, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 288.

[60] Rouhi-Moghaddam E, Hosseini SM, Ebrahimi E, Tabari M, Rahmani A. Comparison of growth, nutrition and soil properties of pure stands of Quercus castaneifolia and mixed with Zelkova carpinifolia in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255: 1149-1160.

[61] Rundel PW. Nitrogen utilization efficiencies in Mediterranean-climate shrubs of California and Chile. Oecologia, 1982, 55: 409-413.

[62] Schlesinger WH, Delucia EH, Billings WD. Nutrient-use efficiency of woody plants on contrasting soils in the western Great Basin, Nevada. Ecology, 1989, 70: 105-113.

[63] Sharma E. Nutrient dynamics in Himalyan alder plantations. Annals of Botany, 1993, 67: 329-336.

[64] Sharma G, Sharma R, Sharma E, Singh KK. Performance of an Age Series of Alnus-cardamom Plantations in the Sikkim Himalayas: Nutrient dynamics. Annals of Botany, 2002, 89: 273-282.

[65] Sharma SC, Pande PK. Patterns of litter nutrient concentration in some plantation ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 1989, 29: 151-163.

[66] Singh JS, Rawat US, Chaturvedi OP. Replacement of oak forest with pine in the Himalaya affects the nitrogen cycle. Nature, 1984, 311: 54-56.

[67] Singh JS, Singh KP, Yadava PS. Coupland RT. Ecosystem Synthesis. Grassland ecosystems of the world: Analysis of grassland and their uses. 1979, London: Cambridge University Press, 231 239

[68] Singh L, Singh JS. Storage and flux of nutrients in dry tropical forest in India. Annals of Botany, 1991, 68: 275-284.

[69] Singh O, Sharma DC, Rawat JK. Production and decomposition of leaf litter in Sal, Teak, Eucalyptus and Poplar forests in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Forester, 1993, 119: 112-121.

[70] Subramanian V, Rajagopal CBK, George M. Nutrient cycling in young teak plantation. II. Biomass production and nutrient cycling. Indian Forester, 2009, 135: 600-610.

[71] Switzer GL, Nelson LE. Nutrient accumulation and cycling in loblolly pine (Pinus. taeda Linn.) plantation ecosystem: The first twenty years. Proceedings of Soil Science Society of America, 1972 143 147

[72] Tewari DN. Monograph on Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.). 1992, Dehradun, India: International Book Distributors

[73] Thakur T, Swamy SL. Analysis of landuse, diversity, biomass, C and nutrient storage of a dry tropical forest ecosystem of India using satellite remote sensing and GIS technique. Proceedings of International Forestry and Environment Symposium, November 2010. 2010, Srilanka: University of Jayawardanepura, 273 278

[74] Turner J, Lambert MJ. Nutrient cycling within a 27 year old Eucalyptus grandis plantation in New South Wales. Forest Ecology and Management, 1983, 6: 155-168.

[75] Vitousek PM. Nutrient cycling and limitation in tropical forests. Ecology, 1984, 65: 285-298.

[76] Vitousek PM, Sanford RL. Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 1986, 17: 137-167.

[77] Vitousek PM. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. American Naturalist, 1982, 119: 553-572.

[78] Wang D, Boremann HF, Lugo AE, Bowden RD. Comparison of nutrient use efficiency and biomass production in five tropical tree taxa. Forest Ecology and Management, 1991, 46: 1-21.

[79] Wang JR, Zhong AL, Comeau P, Tsze M, Kimmins JP. Above ground biomass and nutrient accumulation in an age sequence of aspen (Populus tremuloides) stands in the Boreal White and Black Spruce Zone, British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management, 1995, 78: 127-138.

[80] Wang JR, Zhong AL, Simard SW, Kimmins JP. Above ground biomass and nutrient accumulation in an age sequence of paper birch (Betula papyrifera) stands in the Interior Cedar Hemlock Zone, British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management, 1996, 83: 27-38.

[81] Wang Q, Wang S, Huang Y. Comparisons of litter fall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in a monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in southern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255: 1210-1218.

[82] Westmann EW. Inputs and cycling of mineral nutrients in a coastal Subtropical Eucalyptus forest. Journal of Ecology, 1978, 66: 513-531.

[83] Wu CC, Tsui CC, Hseih CF, Asio VB, Chen ZS. Mineral nutrient status of tree species in relation to environmental factors in the subtropical rain forest of Taiwan. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 239: 81-91.