Diversity of plant species in arecanut agroforests of south Meghalaya, north-east India

H. Tynsong , B. K. Tiwari

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2010, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3) : 281 -286.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2010, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3) : 281 -286. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-010-0072-5
Original Paper

Diversity of plant species in arecanut agroforests of south Meghalaya, north-east India

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In south Meghalaya, farmers maintain a variety of economically important plant species in arecanut agroforestry systems. We investigated plant species composition of arecanut agroforests of south Meghalaya and encountered 160 plants, which included 83 tree species, 22 shrub species, 41 herb species and 14 climber species. The study reveals that arecanut agroforests provide cash income, medicine, timber, fuelwood and edibles for household consumption as well as for sale. We conclude that these agroforestry systems serve as home for many economically important plant species, harbour rich biodiversity and mimic the natural forests both in structural composition as well as ecological and economic functions.

Keywords

agroforests / arecanut / diversity / South Meghalaya / War Khasi

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
H. Tynsong, B. K. Tiwari. Diversity of plant species in arecanut agroforests of south Meghalaya, north-east India. Journal of Forestry Research, 2010, 21(3): 281-286 DOI:10.1007/s11676-010-0072-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Balakrishnan N.P.. Flora of Jowai, Meghalaya. 1981, Howrah: Botanical Survey of India

[2]

Collins S.L., Glenn S.M., Gibson D.J.. Experimental analysis of intermediate disturbance and initial floristic composition: decoupling cause and effect. Ecology, 1995, 76: 486-492.

[3]

Connell J.H.. Diversity in tropical rain forest and coral reefs. Science, 1978, 199: 1302-1310.

[4]

Ehrlich P.R., Wilson E.O.. Biodiversity studies: science and policy. Science, 1991, 253: 758-762.

[5]

Jamir S.A., Pandey H.N.. Vascular plant diversity in the sacred groves of Jaintia Hills in northeast India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2003, 12: 1497-1510.

[6]

Kanjilal U.N., Kanjilal P.C., Das A., De R.N., Bor N.L.. Flora of Assam. 1934, Shillong: Govt. press

[7]

Khan M.L., Shaily M., Kamaljit S.B.. Effectiveness of the protected area network in biodiversity conservation, a case study of Meghalaya state. Biodiversity and Conservation, 1997, 6: 853-865.

[8]

Misra R.. Ecology Work Book. 1968, New Delhi: Oxford and IBH

[9]

Motiur R.M., Furukava Y., Kawata I., Rahman M., Alam M.. Role of homestead forest in household economy and factors affecting forest production: a case study in southwest Bangladesh. Journal of Forest Research, 2006, 11: 89-97.

[10]

Mueller-Doimbois D., Ellenberg H.. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. 1974, New York: John Wiley

[11]

Mukherjee N.. Participatory Methods and Rural Knowledge. Participatory Rural Appraisal Methodology and Applications. 1993, New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company, 40 47

[12]

Pandey C.B., Lata K., Avenkatesh A., Medhi R.P.. Diversity and species of home gardens in south Andaman. Tropical Ecology, 2006, 47: 251-258.

[13]

Pielou E.C.. Population and Community Ecology. Principles and Methods. 1975, New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers Inc.

[14]

Saha N., Azam M.A.. The indigenous hill-farming system of Khasia Tribes in Moulvibazar District of Bangladesh: status and impacts. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 2004, 3: 273-281.

[15]

Schroth G., da Fonseca G.A.B., Harvey C.A., Gaston C., Vasconcelos H.L., Izac A. M.. Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Landscapes. 2004, Washington, D.C: Island Press

[16]

Shannon C.E., Wiener W.. The mathematical theory of communication. 1963, Urbana: University Illinois Press, 360.

[17]

Simpson E.H.. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 1949, 163 688

[18]

Sonwa D.J., Nkongmeneck B.A., Weise S.F., Tchatat M., Adesina A.A., Janssens M.J.J.. Diversity of plants in cocoa agroforests in the humid forest zone of Southern Cameroon. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2007, 16: 2385-2400.

[19]

Sorensen T.. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biological Skrifer/Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 1948, 5: 1-34.

[20]

Takhtajan A.. Floristic Region of the World. 1988, Dehradun: Bishen Singh Mahandra Pal Singh, 71 78

[21]

Tiwari B.K.. Thomas Y., Karki M., Gurung K., Parajuli D.. Forest biodiversity management and livelihood enhancing practices of War Khasi of Meghalaya, India. Himalayan Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Balancing Use and Conservation. 2005, Published by: His majesty Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, 240 255

[22]

Tiwari B.K., Tynsong H., Rani S.. Burley J. J., Evans, Youngquist J. A.. Medicinal and aromatic plants: Medicinal plants and human health. Encyclopedia of Forest Sciences. 2004, UK: Elsevier Ltd. Oxford, 515 523

[23]

Tripathi O.P., Pandey H.N., Tripathi R.S.. Pandey H.N., Barik S.K.. Tree diversity and community characteristics of the sub-tropical evergreen forest in the buffer and core zones of Nokrek biosphere reserve, north-east India. Ecology, Diversity and Conservation of Plants and Ecosystems in India. 2006, New Delhi: Regency Publication, 217 233

[24]

Tynsong H.. Plant diversity and NTFP management in community forests of War area Meghalaya. Ph.D. Thesis. 2009, Shillong-793022, India: North-Eastern Hill University

[25]

Upadhaya K.. Studies on plant biodiversity and ecosystem function of sacred groves of Meghalaya. Ph.D. Thesis. 2002, Shillong: North-Eastern Hill University

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

180

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/