Tree species diversity, richness, and similarity between exotic and indigenous forests in the cloud forests of Eastern Arc Mountains, Taita Hills, Kenya

Abstract

Biodiversity assessment for tree species was conducted in three forest fragments ofthe Taita Hills, southeastern Kenya to compare species diversity between and within three exotic forest plantations of pine, eucalyptus, cypress and the indigenous forests. The study sites were: Ngangao (120 ha), Chawia (86 ha), and Mbololo (185 ha). A Y-plot design was used to sample 32 plots comprising of 65 subplots. At each subplot, all juvenile trees of 5 cm and above in diameter at breast height (DBH) were enumerated and recorded by species. Tree regeneration (seedlings and saplings) was tallied by species. The Shannon-Weiner Index was used to calculate species diversity and evenness. The derived Shannon’s indices were further converted into effective numbers to show the magnitude of differences in species biodiversities. To evaluate differences in species diversities, a one way ANOVA was conducted and to separate the means, Tukey’s HSD and Duncan’s tests were used for even and uneven number of samples respectively. Jaccard’s similarity index was used to assess species similarities. There were more than 58 species whose stem densities varied between 10 and 2 000 trees per hectare. There were significant differences in species diversities between forest types and sites; the indigenous forests showed higher diversities than the exotic forests. Similarly, Chawia sites had higher species diversity than both Ngangao and Mbololo. Chawia also had a higher number of regenerated species than the two other sites, including species such as Xymalos monospora, Rapanea melanophloeos, and Syzygium guineense, which are associated with low levels of disturbance. These findings indicate that the indigenous forest is more diverse in species as would be expected in the tropics. The high species diversity in Chawia could be accounted for by the higher levels of disturbance it underwent, unlike the two other sites. The regeneration of species associated with low levels of disturbance found in the exotic plots of Chawia show the likelihood of presence of long-term soil seed banks. The low regeneration in the exotics plots observed in Ngangao and Mbololo are likely due to the absence of seed banks since some of the plantations were established on bare land (in Ngango), or the inherent physiology (allelopathy) of some of species repelling the regeneration of others.

Keywords

biodiversity / forest fragments / Eastern Arc Mountains / disturbance / exotics / indigenous species

References

[1] Adriaensen F, Githiru M, Mwangombe J, Lens L. 2006. Restoration and increase of connectivity among fragmented forest patches in the Taita Hills, South-east Kenya. CEPF project report, 55 pp.

[2] Beentje H.J.. An ecological and floristical study of the forests of the Taita Hills, Kenya. Utafiti, 1988, 1: 23-66.

[3] Brokaw N.V.L.. Gap-phase regeneration in a tropical forest. Ecology, 1985, 66: 682-687.

[4] Burgess N., D’Amico Hales J., Underwood E., Dinerstein E., Olson D., Itoua I., Schipper J., Ricketts T., Newman K.. Terrestrial ecoregions of Africa and Madagascar: a conservation assessment. 2004, Washington, D.C: Island Press

[5] Bytebier B.. Taita Hills Biodiversity Project report. 2001, Nairobi: National Museums of Kenya.

[6] Chazdon R.L.. Tropical forests - Log’ Em or Leave’ Em?. Science, 1998, 281: 1295-1296.

[7] Chege J., Byteibier B.. Vegetation structure of four small fragments in Taita Hills, Kenya. Journal of East African Natural History, 2005, 94(1): 231-234.

[8] Collins M., Clifton M.. Threatened wildlife in the Taita Hills. Swara, 1984, 7: 10-14.

[9] Convention on Biological Diversity. 1992. http://sedac.ciesin.org/entri/texts/biodiversity,1992.htm (accessed on 22nd April 2008)

[10] Conservation International. 2005. Biodiversity hotspots. http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/Pages/default.aspx (accessed on 23th November, 2008)

[11] Danoff-burg J, Xu C. 2008. Measuring Biological Diversity. http://ww.columbia.edu/itc/cerc/dunoffburg/MBD/LINK.html (accessed on 15th April 2008).

[12] Duryea M.L., English R.J., Hermansen L.A.. A comparison of landscape mulches: Chemical, allelopathic and Decomposition properties. Journal of Arboriculture, 1999, 25: 88-98.

[13] EAWLS. 2001. The Taita Biodiversity Conservation Project. http://www.easterarc.org/org/html/bio.html (accessed on 8th February 2008).

[14] FAO. 1993. Forest Resources Assessment 1990 - Tropical countries. FAO Forestry Paper No. 112. Rome.

[15] FAO Global Forest Resource Assessment 2005. Progress towards sustainable forest management. FAO Forestry Paper 147. 2006, Rome: FAO

[16] Fimbel R.A., Fimbel C.A.. The role of exotic conifer plantations in rehabilitating degraded tropical forest lands: A case study from the Kibale forest in Uganda. Forest Ecology and Management, 1995, 81: 215-226.

[17] Foley J.A., Asner G.P., Costa M.H., Coe M.T., DeFries R., Gibbs H.K., Howard E.A., Olson S., Patz J., Ramankutty N., Snyder P.. Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin. Ecological Society of America, ESA online Journal, 2007, 5: 25-32.

[18] Fox J.F.. Intermediate-Disturbance Hypothesis. Science, 1979, 204: 1344-1345.

[19] Franklin J.F., Spies T.A., Van Pelt R., Carey A.B., Thornburgh D.A., Berg D.R., Lindenmayer D.B., Harmon M.E., Keeton W.S., Shaw D.C., Bible K., Chen J.. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 155: 399-423.

[20] GEF. Project brief: conservation and management of the Eastern Arc mountain forests, Tanzania. 2002, Tanzania: GEF Arusha

[21] Gaines WL, Harrod RJ, Lehmkuhl JF. 1999. Monitoring Biodiversity: Quantification and interpretation. USDA Forest Service. Pacific North-west Research Station. General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-443.

[22] Githiru M., Lens L., Creswell W.. Nest predation in a fragmented Afrotropical forest: evidence from natural and artificial nests. Biological Conservation, 2005, 123: 189-196.

[23] Hobbs R.J., Huenneke L.F.. Disturbance diversity and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology, 1992, 6: 324-337.

[24] Howe H.F., Smallwood J.. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 1982, 13: 201-218.

[25] Kremen C., Williams N.E., Aizen M.A., Gemmill-Herren B., LeBuhn G., Minckley R., Packer L., Potts S.G., Roulston T., Steffan-Dewenter I., Vázquez D.P., Winfree R., Adams L., Crone E.E., Greenleaf S.S., Keitt T.H., Klein A.-M., Regetz J., Ricketts T.H.. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters, 2007, 10: 299-314.

[26] Krebs C.J.. Ecological methodology. 1989, New York: Harper and Row publishers

[27] Krishnaswamy A., Hanson A.. Our forest our future. Summary Report of the World Commission on Forest and Sustainable Development. 1999, Manitoba, Canada: World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development.

[28] Laurance W.F., Nascimento H.E.M., Laurance S.G., Andrade A., Ribeiro J., Giraldo J.P., Le Maitre D.C., van Wilgen B.W., Gelderblom C.M., Bailey C., Chapman R.A., Nel J.A.. Invasive alien trees and water resources in South Africa: case studies of the costs and benefits of management. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 160: 143-159.

[29] Lou J.. Entropy and Diversity. Oikos, 2006, 113(2): 363-375.

[30] Lovett JC. 1993. Eastern Arc moist forest flora, In: J.C. Lovette and S. K. Wasser (eds.), Biogeography and Ecology of Eastern African. Cambridge University Press, pp 33–35.

[31] Madoffe S., Hertel G.D., Rogers P., O’Connell B. K. R.. Monitoring the health of selected Eastern Arc forests in Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology, 2006, 44: 171-177.

[32] Magurran A.E.. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. 1988, Princeton: Princeton University Press

[33] Mogaka H. 2002. Economic instruments for the reduction of forest biodiversity loss in Kenya. GEF/UNDP/FAO Cross Border Biodiversity Project -Reducing Biodiversity Loss at selected. Cross-Border Sites in East Africa. Economics Component Technical Report, No. 16. 43pp. Nairobi.

[34] Mwangombe J. 2005. Restoration and increase of forest connectivity in Taita Hills: Surveys and suitability assessment of exotic plantations for restoration. A report www.cepf.net/xp/static/pdfs/Final_EAWLS_TaitaHills.pdf (Accessed 15th April, 2008).

[35] Onyekwelu J.C., Masandl R., Stimm B.. Tree species diversity and soil status of primary and degraded tropical rainforest ecosystems in south-western Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2008, 20(3): 193-204.

[36] Pellikka P., Lötjönen M., Siljander M., Lens L.. Airborne remote sensing of spatiotemporal change (1955–2004) in indigenous and exotic forest cover in the Taita Hills, Kenya. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2009, 11(4): 221-232.

[37] Prance G.T., Beentje H., Dransfield J., Johns R.. The tropical flora remains uncollected. Ann Missouri Bot Gardens, 2000, 87: 67-71.

[38] Rogers P.C.. Disturbance ecology and forest management: a review of the literature. Intermountain Research Station. 1996, Ogden, UT: US. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 16.

[39] Rogers P.C., Ryel R.J.. Lichen community change in response to succession in aspen forests of the Rocky Mountains, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 256: 1760-1770.

[40] Rogers P.C., O’Connell B., Mwangombe J., Madoffe S., Hertel G.. Forest health monitoring in the Ngangao forest, Taita Hills, Kenya: A five year assessment of change. Journal of East African Natural History, 2008, 97(1): 3-17.

[41] Rogo L., Oguge N.. The aita Hills forest remnants: a disappearing world heritage. Ambio, 2000, 29: 522-523.

[42] Senbeta F., Teketay D., Näslund B.-A.. Native woody species regeneration in exotic tree plantations at Munessa-Shashemene forest, Southern Ethiopia. New Forests, 2002, 24: 131-145.

[43] Scott D.F., Lesch W.. Streamflow responses to afforestation with Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus patula and to felling in the Mokobulaan experimental catchments, South Africa. Journal of Hydrology, 1997, 199: 360-377.

[44] SPSS SPSS 15 for windows. 2006, Chicago: SPSS Inc.

[45] USDA Forest Service. 2007. Field methods instructions for Phase 2 (Forest Inventory) and Phase 3 (Forest Health) of the national Forest Inventory and Analysis program. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/fia/publications/fieldmanuals.shtml.[Cited 8 Dec 2008].

[46] Wassie A., Tekatay D.. Soil seed banks in Northern Ethiopia: implications for the conservation of woody plants. Flora, 2005, 201: 32-43.

[47] Wilcox B.A.. Tropical forest resources and biodiversity: assessing the risks of forest loss and degradation. Unasylva, 1995, 181(46): 43-49.

[48] Wilder C., Brooks T., Lens L.. Vegetation structure and composition of the Taita Hills forest. Journal of East African Natural History, 1998, 87: 181-187.

[49] World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Global Diversity: Status of the Earth’s living Resources. 1992, London: Chapman and Hall

[50] Wandago B.. Realities and perspectives, Kenya country paper. FAO/EC LNV/GTZ workshop proceedings on Tropical Secondary forest management in Africa. 2002, Rome: FAO

[51] Yirdaw E., Luukkanen O.. Indigenous woody species diversity in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. ssp. globulus plantations in the Ethiopian highlands. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2003, 12: 567-582.