Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in old growth forests of Korean pine

Wang Zhengquan , Wang Qingcheng , Cheng Quanshe

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 1998, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4) : 240 -244.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 1998, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4) : 240 -244. DOI: 10.1007/BF02912326
Article

Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in old growth forests of Korean pine

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In this paper, we used geostatistics studied the spatial heterogeneity of total nitrogen and phosphorus on the top soil (0–10 cm) in old growth forests of Korean pine. There was a high degree of spatial heterogeneity of both nutrients which were dependent scales. The isotropic spatial dependent scale were 6.19 m (N%) and 11.10 m (P%). Both nutrients have anisotropic structures at sampled area. Spatial heterogeneity of autocorrelated was over 80%, and spatial autocorrelation was important in nutrient variations in space. This caused spatial patterns of total nitrogen and phosphorus in forest top soil.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wang Zhengquan, Wang Qingcheng, Cheng Quanshe. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in old growth forests of Korean pine. Journal of Forestry Research, 1998, 9(4): 240-244 DOI:10.1007/BF02912326

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Burgess T. M., Webster R.. Optimal interpolation and issrithmic mapping of soil properties 1 The semivariogram and punctual kriging. J of Soil Sci, 1980, 31: 315-331.

[2]

Burrough P. A.. Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil I. The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation. J of Soil Sci, 1983, 34: 577-597.

[3]

Compbell J. B.. Spatial variation of sand content and pH within single contiguous delineations of two soil mapping units. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 1978, 42: 460-464.

[4]

Dutilleul P., Legendre P.. Spatial heterogeneity against heteroscedasticity: an ecological paradigm versus a statistical concept. Oikos, 1993, 66(1): 152-167.

[5]

Gamma Design Software Geostatistics for the environmental sciences, Version 2.1. 1992, Michigan: Gammar Design Plain-well

[6]

Gross K. L., Pregitzer K. S., Burton A.J.. Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities. J of Ecol, 1995, 83: 357-367.

[7]

Isasaks E. H., Srivastava R. M.. An introduction to applied geostatistics. 1989, Harbin: Oxford Univ. Press

[8]

Jackson R. B., Caldwell M.M.. Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants. J of Ecol, 1993, 81: 683-692.

[9]

Journel A., Huijbregts C. J.. Mining geostatistics. 1978, London: Academic Press

[10]

Kolasa J., Pickett S.T.A.. Ecological heterogeneity. 1991, Harbin: Springer

[11]

Legendre P., Fortin M. J.. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetation, 1989, 80: 107-138.

[12]

Li H., Reynolds J.. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos, 1995, 73(2): 280-284.

[13]

Li Jingwen. Forests of Heilongjiang. 1993, Beijing: China Forestry Press

[14]

Rossi R. E., et al. Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol. Monog., 1992, 62: 277-314.

[15]

Schlesinger W. H., et al. On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients indesert ecosystems. Ecol., 1996, 77: 364-374.

[16]

Trangmar B. B., et al. Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Advanced Agronomy, 1985, 38: 44-94.

[17]

Zhengquan Wang, et al. Quantification of spatial heterogeneity in old growth forests of Korean pine. Joournal of Forestry Research, 1997, 8(2): 65-69.

[18]

Yeju Wang, et al. Korean pine forests. 1996, New York, China: Northeast Forestry Univ. Press

[19]

Webster R.. Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in field. Advance in Soil Science, 1985, 3: 1-70.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

117

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/