Impact of fixation/drying conditions on fixation rate, teachability and bioefficacy in CCA-C treated red pine and southern pine

Guo Ai-Long , Y. T. Ung , P. A. Cooper

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2000, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4) : 259 -264.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2000, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4) : 259 -264. DOI: 10.1007/BF02844974
Article

Impact of fixation/drying conditions on fixation rate, teachability and bioefficacy in CCA-C treated red pine and southern pine

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Red pine (Pinus resinosia Ait) and southern pine (Pinus spp.) sapwood blocks were pressure treated with CCA-C at retention of 6.4, 2.0, 1.5 kgm-3 followed by fixation using 11 post-treatment schedules ranging from 50–70 °C and 5 different relative humidity conditions. The effect of these post-treatment schedules on fixation rate, chemical leachability and decay resistant once were evaluated to better understand the effects of fixation/drying conditions on leachability and biodeterioration. Southern pine blocks fixes slightly slower than red pine. Fixation of CCA at high temperature high humidity, essential initially fixation at high humidity for fixation/drying schedules, resulted in lower leaching of chromium and arsenic elements than high temperature low humidity or initially fixation at the high temperature low humidity conditions. Copper leaching was indicated no significant difference under 11 fixation/drying conditions for both species. Weight losses for southern pine byChaetomium globosum was lower than red pine byGloeophyllom trabeum. There were some different capacities of decay resistance for both species under those post treatment conditions.

Keywords

Red pine / Southern pine / Boiefficacy / Leachablity / Fixation rate / CCA-C / Temperature / Humidity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Guo Ai-Long, Y. T. Ung, P. A. Cooper. Impact of fixation/drying conditions on fixation rate, teachability and bioefficacy in CCA-C treated red pine and southern pine. Journal of Forestry Research, 2000, 11(4): 259-264 DOI:10.1007/BF02844974

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alexanater D.L., Ung T.Y., Cooper P. A. Effects of temperature and humidity on CCA-C fixation in pine samples [J]. Wood Production, 1993, 2(2): 29-45.

[2]

American Wood Preservers’ Association Standard method of determining the leaching of wood preservatives [M], 1997 Woodstock, MD: The AWPA Book of Standards, AWPA

[3]

American Wood Preservers’ Association Standard method of testing wood preservatives by laboratory soil-block cultures [M], 1991 Woodstock, MD: The AWPA Book of Standards, AWPA

[4]

Avramidis S., Ruddick J.N.R. Effect of temperature and moisture on CCA fixation Holz-als, Roh-und Werksott, 1989, 7(8): 328-328.

[5]

Boone R.S., Winandy J.E. Effects of redying schedules on preservative fixation and strength of CCA-treated lumber Forest prod. J., 1995, 45(9): 65-73.

[6]

Chen, J.M., Kaldas, M., Ung, T.U., and Cooper, A.P. 1994. Heat transfer and wood moisture effects in moderate temperature fixation of CCA treated wood [R]. IRG/WP/40022, stockhom, Sweet, 13pp.

[7]

Chou C.K., Chandler J.A., Preston R.D. Micro-distribution of metal elements in wood impregnated with a copper-chrome-arsenic preservative as determined by analytical electron microscopy Wood Sci. Technol., 1973, 7: 151-160.

[8]

Conradie W.E., Pizzi A. Progressive heat inactivation of CCA biological performance Proc. Amer. Wood Preserves’ Assoc., 1987, 83: 32-49.

[9]

Cooper, P.A., Alexander, D.L. and Ung, T.Y. 1993. What is chemical fixation? [C] In: chromium-containing waterborne wood preservatives, fixation and environmental issues. Forest Prod. J. Madison, Wis, pp 7–13.

[10]

Cooper P. A., Ung T.Y. A simple quantitative measure of CCA fixation [J]. Forest Prod. J., 1993, 43(5): 19-20.

[11]

Cooper P.A., Ung T.Y, Kamden D.P. Fixation and leaching of red maple treated with CCA-C [J]. Forest Prod. J., 1997, 47(2): 70-74.

[12]

Gray, S.M. 1990. The effect of treatment temperature on the biological performance of CCA-treated wood [R]. Document No IRG/WP/3624.

[13]

Guo A.L, Cooper P.A. Effect of post Treatment temperature and humidity conditions on fixation performance of CCA-C treated red pine and southern pine [J]. Journal of forestry research, 1999, 10(3): 141-146.

[14]

Lee A.W.C., Grafton J.C., Tainter F.H. Effect of rapid redrying shortly after treatment on leachability of CCA-treated southern pine [J]. Forest Prod. J., 1993, 43(2): 37-40.

[15]

Lebow ST., Morrell J.J., Milota M.R. Western wood species treated with chromium copper arsenic: Effect of moisture content [J]. Forest Prod. J., 1996, 46(2): 68-70.

[16]

Kaldas M., Cooper P.A. Effect of wood moisture content on rate of fixation and teachability of CCA-treated red pine [J]. Forest Prod. J., 1996, 46(10): 67-71.

[17]

Peek, R. and Willeitner, H. 1988. Fundamentals on steam fixation of chromated wood preservatives [R]. Documents No IRG/WP/3483.

[18]

Preston A., Mckaig J. Effect of accelerated fixation in decay of CCA-treated wood [J]. Forest Prod. J., 1983, 33(11): 41-44.

[19]

Kartal, S.N. 1999. The teachability, biological resistant and mechanical properties of wood treated with CCA and CCB preservatives [R]. IRG AA/P/99-30207

[20]

Ung T.Y., Cooper P.A. Feasibility of drying CCA-treated red pine pole during fixation [J]. Forest Prod. J., 1996, 46(6): 46-50.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

130

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/