Equivalent-circuit-model-guided feature selection for interpretable battery state-of-health estimation
Ying-Zhu Ren , Xiang Liu , Hai-Yuan Chen , Xiao-Bin Niu
Journal of Electronic Science and Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 100374
Reliable state-of-health (SOH) estimation depends not only on the nonlinear mapper but also on whether its inputs are compact, informative, and physically interpretable. We develop an equivalent circuit model (ECM)-guided feature-selection strategy that uses fractional-ECM parameters offline as physical anchors for charging-response and incremental capacity analysis (ICA) features. The predictive evaluation comprises 4259 cycle samples from ten commercial nickel–cobalt–aluminum (NCA) cells tested at 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C under a 0.5 C protocol. A 13-dimensional (13D) full input is compared with five equal-cardinality 8-dimensional (8D) schemes using gated recurrent unit (GRU) and temporal convolutional network (TCN) nonlinear mappers. Ten-fold leave-one-battery-out (LOBO) validation provides the primary evidence. Among the 8D schemes, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC-8D) gives the lowest GRU macro root-mean-square error (RMSE; ). Physically anchored ECM-8D gives the lowest TCN macro RMSE (). ECM-8D is therefore competitive rather than universally most accurate. The two retained charging-time ratios are deterministically related, and 7D removal sensitivities reveal battery- and architecture-dependent effects. ECM fitting is required only during offline feature design; inference uses charging, ICA, and temperature variables. These results support a bounded route to interpretable SOH input construction within the tested NCA protocol, not cross-chemistry or wider-regime generalization.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy / Equivalent circuit model / Feature selection / Leave-one-battery-out validation / Lithium-ion battery / State of health
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |