Assessment of the impact of sampler housing on indoor passive air sampler measurements of SVOCs

Šimon Vojta , Lisa Melymuk , Roman Prokeš , Jana Klánová

Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 6

PDF
Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :6 DOI: 10.20517/jeea.2023.39
Research Article

Assessment of the impact of sampler housing on indoor passive air sampler measurements of SVOCs

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Passive air sampling (PAS) using a polyurethane foam (PUF) sorbent is a widely used technique to characterize air concentrations of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in indoor environments; however, there is little consensus on the type of housing used in sampler housings and how sampler masses are converted to air concentration. We systematically evaluate the three types of PUF-PAS sampler housings most commonly used indoors, and characterize uptake rates for > 50 SVOCs, covering legacy persistent organic pollutants, pesticides, combustion by-products, and flame retardants for all three housing types. There is a clear association between the amount of shielding of the PUF disk and equivalent air volumes for PUF-PAS, with median sampling rates for double-bowl housings of 0.72 m3/day (0.62-0.92 m3/day), 1.3 m3/day (1.0-1.7 m3/day) for single bowl, and 1.8 m3/day (1.4-2.2 m3/day) for PUFs without any housing. Combining these outcomes with a meta-analysis of existing data on PUF-PAS indoor uptake, we provide recommendations for the range of applicability and selection of sampling rates for PUF-PAS in indoor environments.

Keywords

Indoor air / passive air sampling / sampler validation / PUF-PAS

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Šimon Vojta, Lisa Melymuk, Roman Prokeš, Jana Klánová. Assessment of the impact of sampler housing on indoor passive air sampler measurements of SVOCs. Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment, 2024, 3(1): 6 DOI:10.20517/jeea.2023.39

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Wania F.Passive air sampling for semi-volatile organic chemicals.Environ Sci Process Impacts2020;22:1925-2002

[2]

Li Y,Wania F.Graphical tools for the planning and interpretation of polyurethane foam based passive air sampling campaigns.Environ Sci Process Impacts2022;24:414-25

[3]

Bartkow ME,Kennedy KE,Hawker DW.Passive air sampling theory for semivolatile organic compounds.Chemosphere2005;60:170-6.

[4]

Salim F.Theory and modelling approaches to passive sampling.Environ Sci Process Impacts2019;21:1618-41

[5]

Harner T.PUF/SIP disk effective air volume calculation for target chemicals.

[6]

Herkert NJ,Hornbuckle KC.A model using local weather data to determine the effective sampling volume for pcb congeners collected on passive air samplers.Environ Sci Technol2016;50:6690-7 PMCID:PMC4935961

[7]

Herkert NJ,Smith A.Calibration and evaluation of PUF-PAS sampling rates across the Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling (GAPS) network.Environ Sci Process Impacts2018;20:210-9 PMCID:PMC5783774

[8]

Melymuk L,Harner T.Global intercomparison of polyurethane foam passive air samplers evaluating sources of variability in SVOC measurements.Environ Sci Policy2021;125:1-9 PMCID:PMC8525512

[9]

Melymuk L,Sáňka O,Klánová J.Current challenges in air sampling of semivolatile organic contaminants: sampling artifacts and their influence on data comparability.Environ Sci Technol2014;48:14077-91

[10]

Melymuk L,Prokeš R,Klánová J.Sampling artifacts in active air sampling of semivolatile organic contaminants: Comparing theoretical and measured artifacts and evaluating implications for monitoring networks.Environ Pollut2016;217:97-106

[11]

Melymuk L,Prokeš R.Uncertainties in monitoring of SVOCs in air caused by within-sampler degradation during active and passive air sampling.Atmos Environ2017;167:553-65.

[12]

Chaemfa C,Davison B,Jones KC.A study of aerosol entrapment and the influence of wind speed, chamber design and foam density on polyurethane foam passive air samplers used for persistent organic pollutants.J Environ Monit2009;11:1135-9

[13]

Venier M,Vojta Š.Brominated flame retardants in the indoor environment - Comparative study of indoor contamination from three countries.Environ Int2016;94:150-60

[14]

Vykoukalová M,Vojta Š.Organophosphate esters flame retardants in the indoor environment.Environ Int2017;106:97-104.

[15]

Marek RF,Herkert NJ,Hornbuckle KC.Airborne PCBs and OH-PCBs Inside and outside urban and rural U.S. schools.Environ Sci Technol2017;51:7853-60 PMCID:PMC5777175

[16]

Abdallah MA.Modification and calibration of a passive air sampler for monitoring vapor and particulate phase brominated flame retardants in indoor air: application to car interiors.Environ Sci Technol2010;44:3059-65

[17]

Strandberg B,Koca Akdeva H,Langer S.The use of polyurethane foam (PUF) passive air samplers in exposure studies to PAHs in Swedish seafarers.Polycycl Aromat Comp2022;42:448-59.

[18]

Persoon C.Calculation of passive sampling rates from both native PCBs and depuration compounds in indoor and outdoor environments.Chemosphere2009;74:917-23 PMCID:PMC2657292

[19]

Melymuk L,Kukučka P.Seasonality and indoor/outdoor relationships of flame retardants and PCBs in residential air.Environ Pollut2016;218:392-401

[20]

Harrad S,Ibarra C.Concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls in indoor air and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in indoor air and dust in Birmingham, United Kingdom: implications for human exposure.Environ Sci Technol2006;40:4633-8.

[21]

Saini A,Goosey E.Calibration of two passive air samplers for monitoring phthalates and brominated flame-retardants in indoor air.Chemosphere2015;137:166-73

[22]

Hazrati S.Calibration of polyurethane foam (PUF) disk passive air samplers for quantitative measurement of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs): factors influencing sampling rates.Chemosphere2007;67:448-55

[23]

Harrad S.Calibration of two passive air sampler configurations for monitoring concentrations of hexabromocyclododecanes in indoor air.J Environ Monit2008;10:527-31

[24]

Bohlin P,Škrdlíková L.Evaluation and guidelines for using polyurethane foam (PUF) passive air samplers in double-dome chambers to assess semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in non-industrial indoor environments.Environ Sci Process Impacts2014;16:2617-26

[25]

Okeme JO,Abdollahi A.Passive air sampling of flame retardants and plasticizers in Canadian homes using PDMS, XAD-coated PDMS and PUF samplers.Environ Pollut2018;239:109-17

[26]

Demirtepe H,Diamond ML.Linking past uses of legacy SVOCs with today's indoor levels and human exposure.Environ Int2019;127:653-63.

[27]

Wilford BH,Zhu J,Jones KC.Passive sampling survey of polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardants in indoor and outdoor air in Ottawa, Canada: implications for sources and exposure.Environ Sci Technol2004;38:5312-8.

[28]

Bohlin P,Strandberg B.Field evaluation of polyurethane foam passive air samplers to assess airborne PAHs in occupational environments.Environ Sci Technol2010;44:749-54

[29]

Strandberg B,Sjöström M,Koca Akdeva H.Evaluation of polyurethane foam passive air sampler (PUF) as a tool for occupational PAH measurements.Chemosphere2018;190:35-42

[30]

Tao S,Xu W.Calibration of a passive sampler for both gaseous and particulate phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.Environ Sci Technol2007;41:568-73.

[31]

Meng Z,Cao B,Liu F.Indoor airborne phthalates in university campuses and exposure assessment.Build and Enviro2020;180:107002.

[32]

Bohlin P,Škrdlíková L.Outdoor passive air monitoring of semi volatile organic compounds (SVOCs): a critical evaluation of performance and limitations of polyurethane foam (PUF) disks.Environ Sci Process Impacts2014;16:433-44

[33]

Audy O,Venier M.PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in indoor environments - a comparison of indoor contamination in Canada and Czech Republic.Chemosphere2018;206:622-31

[34]

Antweiler RC.Evaluation of statistical treatments of left-censored environmental data using coincident uncensored data sets. II. group comparisons.Environ Sci Technol2015;49:13439-46

[35]

Melymuk L,Riddell N,Vojta Š.Challenges in the analysis of novel flame retardants in indoor dust: results of the INTERFLAB 2 interlaboratory evaluation.Environ Sci Technol2018;52:9295-303

[36]

Tran DT,Coddeville P.Indoor-utdoor behavior and sources of size-resolved airborne particles in French classrooms.Build and Environ2014;81:183-91.

[37]

Xu H,Niu X.Concentrations, particle-size distributions, and indoor/outdoor differences of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a middle school classroom in Xi'an, China.Environ Geochem Health2015;37:861-73

[38]

Markovic MZ,Staebler RM,Harner T.Evaluation of the particle infiltration efficiency of three passive samplers and the PS-1 active air sampler.Atmos Environ2015;112:289-93

[39]

Melymuk L,Vojta Š.Distribution of legacy and emerging semivolatile organic compounds in five indoor matrices in a residential environment.Chemosphere2016;153:179-86

[40]

Cequier E,Covaci A,Becher G.Occurrence of a broad range of legacy and emerging flame retardants in indoor environments in Norway.Environ Sci Technol2014;48:6827-35

[41]

Herkert NJ.Effects of room airflow on accurate determination of PUF-PAS sampling rates in the indoor environment.Environ Sci Process Impacts2018;20:757-66 PMCID:PMC5966328

[42]

Shoeib M,Lee SC,Zhu J.Sorbent-impregnated polyurethane foam disk for passive air sampling of volatile fluorinated chemicals.Anal Chem2008;80:675-82

[43]

Ahrens L,Shoeib M,Reiner EJ.Characterization of two passive air samplers for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.Environ Sci Technol2013;47:14024-33

[44]

Papazian S,Bonnefille B,Xie H.Silicone foam for passive sampling and nontarget analysis of air.Environ Sci Technol Lett2023;10:989-97

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

46

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/