High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in the Treatment of Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Lan Yang , Shijie Fan , Chuke Cheng , Bojiang Chen , Haoyu Wang , Yu Zhang , Weimin Li

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2) : e70139

PDF (2688KB)
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2) :e70139 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.70139
ARTICLE
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in the Treatment of Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Author information +
History +
PDF (2688KB)

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in adults with hypercapnic respiratory failure (HRF).

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and Weipu comparing HFNC with NIV in HRF patients. Primary outcomes were mortality and endotracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included blood gas values, hospital/intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, nasal skin breakdown, and comfort. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results: Twenty trials involving 1835 patients were included. No significant differences were observed in mortality (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.28), endotracheal intubation (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.06), PaCO2 (MD, –0.87 mmHg; 95% CI, –2.98 to 1.25) or PaO2 (MD, 2.67 mmHg; 95% CI, –0.66 to 6.01). However, HFNC significantly reduced hospital stay (MD, –0.69 days; 95% CI, –1.08 to –0.30) and ICU stay (MD, –0.98 days; 95% CI, –1.50 to –0.45), lowered nasal skin breakdown risk (RR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.45) and improved comfort (MD, –1.19; 95% CI, –1.98 to –0.41). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed the principal findings.

Conclusions: HFNC was not significantly different from NIV for mortality and endotracheal intubation in HRF but was associated with shorter hospital and ICU stays, reduced nasal facial skin breakdown and improved comfort. Larger trials in diverse populations are needed.

Keywords

intensive care unit / noninvasive ventilation / randomized controlled trial / respiratory failure

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lan Yang, Shijie Fan, Chuke Cheng, Bojiang Chen, Haoyu Wang, Yu Zhang, Weimin Li. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in the Treatment of Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2026, 19 (2) : e70139 DOI:10.1111/jebm.70139

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

S. Safiri, K. Carson-Chahhoud, M. Noori, et al., “Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Its Attributable Risk Factors in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” BMJ 378 (2022): e069679.

[2]

Y. Chung, F. L. Garden, G. B. Marks, et al., “Long-Term Cohort Study of Patients Presenting with Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure,” BMJ Open Respiratory Research: Homepage 11, no. 1 (2024): e002266.

[3]

C. R. Osadnik, V. S. Tee, K. V. Carson-Chahhoud, et al., “Non-Invasive Ventilation for the Management of Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure due to Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7, no. 7 (2017): CD004104.

[4]

B. Rochwerg, L. Brochard, M. W. Elliott, et al., “Official ERS/ATS Clinical Practice Guidelines: Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure,” European Respiratory Journal 50, no. 2 (2017): 1602426.

[5]

G. J. Criner, S. Gayen, M. Zantah, et al., “Clinical Review of Non-Invasive Ventilation,” European Respiratory Journal 64, no. 5 (2024): 2400396.

[6]

M. Carron, U. Freo, A. S. BaHammam, et al., “Complications of Non-Invasive Ventilation Techniques: A Comprehensive Qualitative Review of Randomized Trials,” British Journal of Anaesthesia 110, no. 6 (2013): 896–914.

[7]

G. Spoletini, M. Alotaibi, F. Blasi, et al., “Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Oxygen in Adults: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Implications,” Chest 148, no. 1 (2015): 253–261.

[8]

N. Ovtcharenko, E. Ho, W. Alhazzani, et al., “High-flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-Invasive Ventilation for Acute Hypercapnic respiratory Failure in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials,” Critical Care 26, no. 1 (2022): 348.

[9]

A. C. Fahey, M. O'Connell, N. Cornally, et al., “High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in the Treatment of Acute Hypercapnic respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Clinical Respiratory Journal 17, no. 11 (2023): 1091–1102.

[10]

M. Lagina and T. S. Valley, “Diagnosis and Management of Acute Respiratory Failure,” Critical Care Clinics 40, no. 2 (2024): 235–253.

[11]

X. Wan, W. Wang, J. Liu, et al., “Estimating the Sample Mean and Standard Deviation From the Sample Size, Median, Range and/or Interquartile Range,” BMC Medical Research Methodology 14 (2014): 135.

[12]

J. A. C. Sterne, J. Savović, M. J. Page, et al., “RoB 2: A Revised Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials,” BMJ 366 (2019): l4898.

[13]

G. H. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, G. E. Vist, et al., “GRADE: An Emerging Consensus on Rating Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations,” BMJ 336, no. 7650 (2008): 924–926.

[14]

M. K. Lee, J. Choi, B. Park, et al., “High Flow Nasal Cannulae Oxygen Therapy in Acute-Moderate Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure,” Clinical Respiratory Journal 12, no. 6 (2018): 2046–2056.

[15]

J. Wang and Q. Li, “Randomized Controlled Study of HFNC and NPPV in the Treatment of AECOPD Combined with Type II Respiratory Failure,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 39, no. 12 (2019): 945–948.

[16]

G. Jing, J. Li, D. Hao, et al., “Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula With Noninvasive Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients With Hypercapnia in Preventing Postextubation respiratory Failure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial,” Research in Nursing & Health 42, no. 3 (2019): 217–225.

[17]

S. K. Chai, X. L. Wang, et al., “Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on the Efficacy and Short-Term Prognosis of Transnasal High Flow Oxygen Inhalation AECOPD Patients With Type II Respiratory Failure,” Journal of Hebei Medical University 41, no. 7 (2020): 764–767,828.

[18]

A. Cortegiani, F. Longhini, F. Madotto, et al., “High Flow Nasal Therapy Versus Noninvasive Ventilation as Initial Ventilatory Strategy in COPD Exacerbation: A Multicenter Non-Inferiority Randomized Trial,” Critical Care 24, no. 1 (2020): 692.

[19]

X. Deng, H. R. Yu, S. Quan, et al., “Effects of Transnasal High-Flow Oxygen Therapy on Patients With Type II Acute Respiratory Failure,” International Journal of Respiration 40, no. 24 (2020): 1868–1873.

[20]

P. B. Doshi, J. S. Whittle, G. Dungan, et al., “The Ventilatory Effect of High Velocity Nasal Insufflation Compared to Non-Invasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Hypercapneic Respiratory Failure: A Subgroup Analysis,” Heart & Lung: The Journal of Critical Care 49, no. 5 (2020): 610–615.

[21]

H. Q. Lu, F. Wang, J. C. Wang, et al., “Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy and Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Treatment of Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Complicated With Type II respiratory Failure,” Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine 13, no. 10 (2020): 994–999.

[22]

Y. Papachatzakis, P. T. Nikolaidis, S. Kontogiannis, et al., “High-Flow Oxygen Through Nasal Cannula vs. Non-Invasive Ventilation in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 16 (2020): 5994.

[23]

D. Tan, J. H. Walline, B. Ling, et al., “High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Versus Non-Invasive Ventilation for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial,” Critical Care 24, no. 1 (2020): 489.

[24]

S. Q. Wang and J. Wang, “Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Ventilation on Type II respiratory Failure Caused by Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,” Journal of Clinical Emergency 22, no. 3 (2021): 193–198.

[25]

A. Liu, Y. Zhou, and Z. Pu, “Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy for Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Combination With Type II respiratory Failure,” Journal of International Medical Research 51, no. 6 (2023): 3000605231182558.

[26]

S. Y. Lu and R. Q. Sun, “Effect of High Flow Nasal Cannula and Non-Invasive Ventilation in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Complicated With Type II Respiratory Failure,” Medical innovation in China 21, no. 5 (2024): 24–27.

[27]

I. Pantazopoulos, S. Boutlas, G. Mavrovounis, et al., “Nasal High Flow or Noninvasive Ventilation? Navigating Hypercapnic COPD Exacerbation Treatment: A Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial,” Respiratory Medicine 232 (2024): 107762.

[28]

J. L. Sun, X. Z. Zhang, et al., “Observation on the Efficacy of Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation and High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in the Treatment of Mild Respiratory Failure in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,” Shiyong Yiyuan Linchuang Zazhi 21, no. 1 (2024): 68–71.

[29]

D. Tan, B. Wang, P. Cao, et al., “High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Versus Non-Invasive Ventilation for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Acute-Moderate Hypercapnic respiratory Failure: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial,” Critical Care 28, no. 1 (2024): 250.

[30]

J. Wang and N. Tang, “Application of High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Elderly Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Type II respiratory Failure,” Chinese Journal of Clinical Research 37, no. 2 (2024): 242–245.

[31]

I. S. Maia, L. Kawano-Dourado, L. Tramujas, et al., “High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Acute respiratory Failure: The RENOVATE Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA 333, no. 10 (2025): 875–890.

[32]

O. Haciosman, H. Ergenc, A. Az, et al., “A High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,” American Journal of Emergency Medicine 87 (2025): 38–43.

[33]

J. Y. Yang, C. L. Zhang, et al., “Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Nasal High Flow Oxygen Therapy and Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of COPD Complicated With Type II respiratory Failure,” Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases 32, no. 3 (2025): 57–59.

[34]

S. Oczkowski, B. Ergan, L. Bos, et al., “ERS Clinical Practice Guidelines: High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute respiratory Failure,” European Respiratory Journal 59, no. 4 (2022): 2101574.

[35]

J. Helms and P. Catoire, “Oxygen Therapy in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Guidelines From the SRLF-SFMU Consensus Conference,” Annals of Intensive Care 14, no. 1 (2024): 140.

[36]

O. Roca, J. Li, and T. Mauri, “High-Flow Nasal Cannula: Evolving Practices and Novel Clinical and Physiological Insights,” Intensive Care Medicine 50, no. 5 (2024): 758–761.

[37]

Y. Huang, W. Lei, W. Zhang, et al., “High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Canadian Respiratory Journal 2020 (2020): 7406457.

[38]

M. Pinkham and S. Tatkov, “Effect of Flow and Cannula Size on Generated Pressure During Nasal High Flow,” Critical Care 24, no. 1 (2020): 248.

[39]

N. Groves and A. Tobin, “High Flow Nasal Oxygen Generates Positive Airway Pressure in Adult Volunteers,” Australian Critical Care 20, no. 4 (2007): 126–131.

[40]

S. Tatkov, M. Rees, A. Gulley, et al., “Asymmetrical Nasal High Flow Ventilation Improves Clearance of CO(2) From the Anatomical Dead Space and Increases Positive Airway Pressure,” Journal of Applied Physiology 134, no. 2 (2023): 365–377.

[41]

E. Rezoagli, A. Nova, G. Carteaux, et al., “A Clinical Guide to Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in Acute Respiratory Failure: Ventilation Settings, Technical Optimization and Clinical Indications,” Critical Care 29, no. 1 (2025): 496.

[42]

E. C. Goligher and A. S. Slutsky, “Not Just Oxygen? Mechanisms of Benefit from High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 195, no. 9 (2017): 1128–1131.

[43]

M. Macrea, S. Oczkowski, B. Rochwerg, et al., “Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation in Chronic Stable Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 202, no. 4 (2020): e74–e87.

[44]

C. Jácome, M. Jácome, S. Correia, et al., “Effectiveness, Adherence and Safety of Home High Flow Nasal Cannula in Chronic Respiratory Disease and Respiratory Insufficiency: A Systematic Review,” Archivos de Bronconeumología 60, no. 8 (2024): 490–502.

Rights & permissions

2026 The Author(s). Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine published by Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (2688KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉