Impact of Different Dosage Forms of Orally Administered Chinese Herbal Medicine on Treatment and Adverse Effect Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study

Claire Chenwen Zhong , Betty Huan Wang , Mary Yue Jiang , Leonard Ho , Fai Fai Ho , Irene Xin Yin Wu , Yin Ting Cheung , Vincent Chi Ho Chung

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1) : e70115

PDF (2067KB)
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1) :e70115 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.70115
ARTICLE
Impact of Different Dosage Forms of Orally Administered Chinese Herbal Medicine on Treatment and Adverse Effect Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
Author information +
History +
PDF (2067KB)

Abstract

Aim: In traditional Chinese medicine, different dosage forms of orally administered Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) may introduce bias in estimating treatment and adverse effects. This meta-epidemiological study aimed to evaluate whether the use of different orally administered CHM dosage forms is associated with overestimation or underestimation of treatment and adverse effects in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched to identify potentially eligible meta-analyses (MAs) of RCTs evaluating CHM interventions. A two-step meta-epidemiological analysis was performed, using ratios of odds ratios for binary outcomes and differences in standardized mean differences for continuous outcomes. These metrics assessed whether different orally administered CHM dosage forms—including CHM decoctions, Chinese patent medicines (CPMs), and CHM granules influenced the magnitude of reported treatment effects or adverse effects.

Results: Eighty-two MAs comprising 1263 RCTs were analyzed. Overall, there was no consistent evidence that any oral dosage form systematically overestimated or underestimated treatment effects or adverse effects. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings, with the exception that CHM decoctions showed slightly larger binary treatment effects compared to CPMs after adjusting for incomplete outcome data. However, when adjusted for all confounders, CPMs yielded significantly greater continuous treatment effects than CHM decoctions. Additionally, CHM granules were associated with larger continuous treatment effects than CHM decoctions after adjusting for RCT funding. Subgroup analyses indicated that RCTs on digestive diseases tended to report larger effect estimates when using CHM decoctions, whereas RCTs on endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases tended to report larger effect estimates when using CPMs.

Conclusions: This meta-epidemiological study suggests that while oral dosage forms of CHM are associated with minimal differences in reported treatment and adverse effect estimates, specific dosage forms may offer advantages in certain contexts. Subgroup analyses indicate that digestive disease trials tend to report larger estimates with CHM decoctions, and endocrine/metabolic disease trials with CPMs. When adjusting for confounders, CPMs yield greater continuous treatment effects compared with CHM decoctions, while CHM granules are associated with larger estimates than CHM decoctions after adjusting for RCT funding. Further research is needed to confirm their clinical relevance and guide formulation choices in CHM practice.

Keywords

chinese herbal medicine / chinese traditional medicine / dosage forms / drugs / meta-epidemiological study

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Claire Chenwen Zhong, Betty Huan Wang, Mary Yue Jiang, Leonard Ho, Fai Fai Ho, Irene Xin Yin Wu, Yin Ting Cheung, Vincent Chi Ho Chung. Impact of Different Dosage Forms of Orally Administered Chinese Herbal Medicine on Treatment and Adverse Effect Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2026, 19 (1) : e70115 DOI:10.1111/jebm.70115

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

E. Chan, M. Tan, J. Xin, S. Sudarsanam, and J. DE, “Interactions Between Traditional Chinese Medicines and Western,” Current Opinion in Drug Discovery & Development 13, no. 1 (2010): 50–65.

[2]

H. Luo, Q. Li, A. Flower, G. Lewith, and J. Liu, “Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety Between Granules and Decoction of Chinese Herbal Medicine: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 140, no. 3 (2012): 555–567.

[3]

F. Hou, Y. Miao, X. Wu, et al., “Study on Masking the Bitterness of Chinese Medicine Decoction-Mate,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2022 (2022): 3701288.

[4]

R. Qiu, X. Zhang, C. Zhao, M. Li, and H. Shang, “Comparison of the Efficacy of Dispensing Granules With Traditional Decoction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Annals of Translational Medicine 6, no. 3 (2018): 38.

[5]

X. Huang, X. Liu, X. Lin, et al., “Thermodynamics Driving Phytochemical Self-Assembly Morphological Change and Efficacy Enhancement Originated From Single and Co-Decoction of Traditional Chinese Medicine,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology 20, no. 1 (2022): 527.

[6]

C. Y. Zhang, X. X. Li, P. Li, Y. Jiang, and H. J. Li, “Consistency Evaluation Between Dispensing Granule and Traditional Decoction From Coptidis Rhizoma by Using an Integrated Quality-Based Strategy,” Phytochemical Analysis 32, no. 2 (2021): 153–164.

[7]

L.-L. Qin, M. Yu, H.-X. Zhang, H.-M. Jia, X.-C. Ye, and Z.-M. Zou, “Quality Markers of Baizhu Dispensing Granules Based on Multi-Component Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Combined With Network Pharmacology and Chemometric Analysis,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 288 (2022): 114968.

[8]

E. Shang, Z. Zhu, L. Liu, Y. Tang, and J.-A. Duan, “UPLC-QTOF-MS With Chemical Profiling Approach for Rapidly Evaluating Chemical Consistency Between Traditional and Dispensing Granule Decoctions of Tao-Hong-Si-Wu Decoction,” Chemistry Central Journal 6 (2012): 1–9.

[9]

H. Luo, H. Chen, C. Liu, et al., “The Key Issues and Development Strategy of Chinese Classical Formulas Pharmaceutical Preparations,” Chinese Medicine 16 (2021): 1–14.

[10]

X. Li, L. Huang, L. Wang, et al., “The Reporting Checklist for Chinese Patent Medicine Guidelines: RIGHT for CPM,” Pharmacological Research 199 (2024): 107015.

[11]

W. Zhuang, Z. Fan, Y. Chu, et al., “Chinese Patent Medicines in the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China,” Frontiers in pharmacology 11 (2020): 1066.

[12]

N. P. Committee, Chinese Pharmacopoeia (Beijing, China: China Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Press, 2020), p. 317.

[13]

J. Zhang, T. Chen, Y. Wen, K. T. H. Siah, and X. Tang, “Insights and Future Prospects of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia,” Phytomedicine 127 (2024): 155481.

[14]

H. Zhang, J. Song, H. Tan, H. Xu, S. Li, and S. Chen, “From Traditional Decoction to Modern Granule: Perspectives and Prospects of Chinese Medicine Dispensing Granules,” World Science and Technology-Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine 14 (2012): 1740–1753.

[15]

M. H. Murad and Z. Wang, “Guidelines for Reporting Meta-Epidemiological Methodology Research,” Evidence-Based Medicine 22, no. 4 (2017): 139–142.

[16]

J. A. Sterne, P. Jüni, K. F. Schulz, D. G. Altman, C. Bartlett, and M. Egger, “Statistical Methods for Assessing the Influence of Study Characteristics on Treatment Effects in ‘Meta-Epidemiological’ Research,” Statistics in Medicine 21, no. 11 (2002): 1513–1524.

[17]

C. C. Zhong, H. Wang, Y. Jiang, et al., “Influence of Dosage Forms of Chinese Herbal Medicine on Treatment Effect and Safety Effect Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study,” PROSPERO: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, 2024, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=552112.

[18]

J. P. T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler et al. (eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.4 (updated August 2023) (Cochrane, 2023), www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

[19]

R. Haring, M. Ghannad, L. Bertizzolo, and M. J. Page, “No Evidence Found for an Association Between Trial Characteristics and Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials of Testosterone Therapy in Men: A Meta-Epidemiological Study,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 122 (2020): 12–19.

[20]

J. Savović, R. J. Harris, L. Wood, et al., “Development of a Combined Database for Meta-Epidemiological Research,” Research Synthesis Methods 1, no. 3-4 (2010): 212–225.

[21]

National Cancer Institute. NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms12 2025, https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/conventional-therapy.

[22]

J. Y. Ng, T. Dhawan, R.-G. Fajardo, et al., “The Brief History of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Terminology and the Development and Creation of an Operational Definition,” Integrative Medicine Research 12, no. 4 (2023): 100978.

[23]

N. L. Wilczynski and R. B. Haynes, “EMBASE Search Strategies Achieved for Retrieving Methodologically High Sensitivity and Specificity Sound Systematic Reviews,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60, no. 1 (2007): 29–33.

[24]

J. P. Higgins, D. G. Altman, P. C. Gøtzsche, et al., “The Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials,” Bmj 343 (2011): d5928.

[25]

M. J. Page, J. P. Higgins, G. Clayton, J. A. Sterne, A. Hróbjartsson, and J. Savović, “Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies,” PLoS ONE 11, no. 7 (2016): e0159267.

[26]

C. S. Berkey, D. C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, and G. A. Colditz, “A Random-Effects Regression Model for Meta-Analysis,” Statistics in Medicine 14, no. 4 (1995): 395–411.

[27]

K. J. Rothman, S. Lanes, and S. T. Sacks, “The Reporting Odds Ratio and Its Advantages Over the Proportional Reporting Ratio,” Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 13, no. 8 (2004): 519–523.

[28]

V. T. Hunniford, A. Grudniewicz, D. A. Fergusson, et al., “A Systematic Assessment of Preclinical Multilaboratory Studies and a Comparison to Single Laboratory Studies,” Elife 12 (2023): e76300.

[29]

R. DerSimonian and N. Laird, “Meta-Analysis in Clinical Trials,” Controlled Clinical Trials 7, no. 3 (1986): 177–188.

[30]

J. P. Higgins, S. G. Thompson, J. J. Deeks, and D. G. Altman, “Measuring Inconsistency in Meta-Analyses,” Bmj 327, no. 7414 (2003): 557–560.

[31]

J. P. Ioannidis, “Interpretation of Tests of Heterogeneity and Bias in Meta-analysis,” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14, no. 5 (2008): 951–957.

[32]

M. Egger, G. D. Smith, M. Schneider, and C. Minder, “Bias in Meta-Analysis Detected by a Simple, Graphical Test,” Bmj 315, no. 7109 (1997): 629–634.

[33]

B. H. Wang, Y. L. Lin, Y. Y. Gao, et al., “Trial Characteristics and Treatment Effect Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials of Chinese Herbal Medicine: A Meta-Epidemiological Study,” Journal of Integrative Medicine 22, no. 3 (2024): 223–234.

[34]

Q. Wang, Y. Dou, S. Zhao, et al., “Analysis of Chemical Consistency and the Anti-Tumor Activity of Huangqi-Ezhu (HQ-EZ) Concentrated-Granules and Decoction,” Annals of Palliative Medicine 9, no. 4 (2020): 1648–1659.

[35]

L. Chen, J. Liu, Q. Wang, and J. Chen, “Fingerprint Comparison Between Gegen Qinlian Preparations of Three Different Pharmaceutical Forms Including Decoction, Dispensing Granule and Pill,” Chromatographia 69, no. 1 (2009): 123–127.

[36]

Y. Zhuang, J. Yan, W. Zhu, L. Chen, D. Liang, and X. Xu, “Can the Aggregation be a New Approach for Understanding the Mechanism of Traditional Chinese Medicine?,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 117, no. 2 (2008): 378–384.

[37]

J. Hu, Z. Wu, J. Yan, W. Pang, D. Liang, and X. Xu, “A Promising Approach for Understanding the Mechanism of Traditional Chinese Medicine by the Aggregation Morphology,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 123, no. 2 (2009): 267–274.

[38]

Y. M. Yang, “Editorial,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 41, no. 1 (2010): 1.

[39]

Q. Nie, H. Chen, J. Hu, S. Fan, and S. Nie, “Dietary Compounds and Traditional Chinese Medicine Ameliorate Type 2 Diabetes by Modulating Gut Microbiota,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 59, no. 6 (2019): 848–863.

[40]

A. Koh, F. De Vadder, P. Kovatcheva-Datchary, and F. Bäckhed, “From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites,” Cell 165, no. 6 (2016): 1332–1345.

[41]

W. Wang, “Automatic Dispensing Technology of Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula Granules in Pharmacy under the Background of Artificial Intelligence,” in The 2020 International Conference on Machine Learning and Big Data Analytics for IoT Security and Privacy (Springer International Publishing; 2021), pp. 566–572.

[42]

W. Xiao, X.-Z. ZHANG, L. CAO, and Z.-Z. WANG, “Quality Control of the Production Process Based on Substance-Related-Effects for Chinese Patent Medicine (In Chinese),” Journal of Nanjing University of traditional Chinese Medicine 38, no. 9 (2022): 743–747.

[43]

J.-Y. Liu, K.-F. Lee, C.-W. Sze, et al., “Intestinal Absorption and Bioavailability of Traditional Chinese Medicines: A Review of Recent Experimental Progress and Implication for Quality Control,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 65, no. 5 (2012): 621–633.

[44]

L. Gao, X. Xia, Y. Shuai, et al., “Gut Microbiota, a Hidden Protagonist of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Acute Ischemic Stroke,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 14 (2023): 1164150.

[45]

F. Chen, Q. Wen, J. Jiang, et al., “Could the Gut Microbiota Reconcile the Oral Bioavailability Conundrum of Traditional Herbs?,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 179 (2016): 253–264.

[46]

M. Guo, S. Ding, C. Zhao, et al., “Red Ginseng and Semen Coicis Can Improve the Structure of Gut Microbiota and Relieve the Symptoms of Ulcerative Colitis,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 162 (2015): 7–13.

[47]

Q. Guo, X. Jiang, C. Ni, et al., “Gut Microbiota-Related Effects of Tanhuo Decoction in Acute Ischemic Stroke,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2021 (2021): 5596924.

[48]

Q. Guo, C. Ni, L. Li, et al., “Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine Improves Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Clinic to Mechanism Exploration With Gut Microbiota,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 12 (2022): 827129.

[49]

C.-W. Cheng, T.-X. Wu, H.-C. Shang, et al., “CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration,” Annals of Internal Medicine 167, no. 2 (2017): 112–121.

[50]

Q. Li, “Analysis of the Characteristics and Development Prospects of Concentrated Granules of Single Chinese Herbal Medicine (in Chinese),” Journal of Li-shizhen Traditional Chinese Medicine 2006, no. 10: 2006–2007.

[51]

Y. L. Hung, S. S. Leung, S. P. Chiu, et al., “Perceptions About Traditional Chinese Medicine Use Among Chinese Breast Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study,” Cancer Medicine 12, no. 2 (2023): 1997–2007.

[52]

I. Abraha, A. Cherubini, F. Cozzolino, et al., “Deviation From Intention to Treat Analysis in Randomised Trials and Treatment Effect Estimates: Meta-Epidemiological Study,” Bmj 350 (2015).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine published by Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (2067KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/