Comparative Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Containing Regimens for Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

Junqiang Niu , Xuan Tuo , Xu Hui , Man Li , Suyi Liu , Zhichun Zhang , Jianming Tang , Yongbin Lu , Kehu Yang

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : e70037

PDF
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : e70037 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.70037
ARTICLE

Comparative Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Containing Regimens for Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-based regimens, including traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) combinations, for the treatment of triple-negative BC (TNBC) using a network meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, VIP, WanFang database were searched comprehensively from inception to February 27, 2025. Eligible studies included adult TNBC patients treated with paclitaxel alone or in combination with other therapies. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, pathologic complete response, disease-free survival, and adverse events (AEs). Statistical analyses were performed using the frequentist contrast-based method and random effects model. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach using CINeMA application and a modified Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were used to assess the certainty of evidence and methodological quality.

Results: 93 randomized controlled trials (108 publications) involving 19,016 patients were included. Paclitaxel-based quadruple and quintuple therapies significantly improved ORR (relative risk (RR) = 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.39–2.71], low certainty of evidence) and OS duration (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 59.16 weeks, 95% CI [28.81–89.51], low) compared to monotherapy. Paclitaxel-based monotherapy and double therapy had the least potential to cause neutropenia. Regimens incorporating TCM showed superior ORR compared to non-TCM combinations and monotherapy (18 randomized controlled trials, 1570 patients; RR = 1.29. 95% CI [1.17–1.41], moderate; RR = 1.55, 95% CI [1.37–1.75], moderate).

Conclusions: Combination therapies, especially those incorporating targeted agents or platinum-based regimens, may exhibit superior efficacy while maintaining acceptable safety profiles. Additionally, TCM may be associated with a higher ORR and a reduced risk of AEs. Further large-scale, high-quality studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy and safety of combining paclitaxel with targeted agents, platinum-based therapies, or TCM in the treatment of TNBC.

Keywords

combined modality therapy / network meta-analysis / paclitaxel / traditional Chinese medicine / triple-negative breast cancer

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Junqiang Niu, Xuan Tuo, Xu Hui, Man Li, Suyi Liu, Zhichun Zhang, Jianming Tang, Yongbin Lu, Kehu Yang. Comparative Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Containing Regimens for Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2025, 18(2): e70037 DOI:10.1111/jebm.70037

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

10

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/