MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update

References

[1] Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, Hasan SS, Doi SA. Quality versus risk-of-bias assessment in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 129: 172–175.

[2] Hartling L, Hamm M, Milne A, et al. Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability Testing of Quality Assessment Instruments. AHRQ Methods for Effective Health Care; 2012.

[3] Stone JC, Glass K, Clark J, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Munn Z, Tugwell P, et al. The MethodologicAl STandards for Epidemiological Research (MASTER) scale demonstrated a unified framework for bias assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 134: 52–64.

[4] Stone JC, Glass K, Munn Z, Tugwell P, Doi SAR. Comparison of bias adjustment methods in meta-analysis suggests that quality effects modeling may have less limitations than other approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 117: 36–45.

[5] Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST. Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy. 2000; 86(2), 94–99.

[6] Baumgartner TA, Jackson AS. Measurement for Evaluation in Physical Education and Exercise Science. Wm. C. Brown Publishers; 1987.

[7] Stone JC, Gurunathan U, Aromataris E, et al. Bias assessment in outcomes research: the role of relative versus absolute approaches. Value Health. 2021; 24(8), 1145–1149.

[8] Aboelsoud MM, Siddique O, Morales A, Seol Y, MO Al-Qadi. fluid choice matters in critically-ill patients with acute pancreatitis: lactated Ringer's vs. isotonic saline. R I Med J (2013). 2016; 99(10), 39–42.

[9] Choosakul S, Harinwan K, Chirapongsathorn S, et al. Comparison of normal saline versus Lactated Ringer's solution for fluid resuscitation in patients with mild acute pancreatitis, A randomized controlled trial. Pancreatology. 2018; 18(5), 507–512.

[10] de-Madaria E, Herrera-Marante I, Gonzalez-Camacho V, et al. Fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution vs normal saline in acute pancreatitis: a triple-blind, randomized, controlled trial. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018; 6(1), 63–72.

[11] Karki B, Thapa S, Khadka D, et al. Intravenous Ringers lactate versus normal saline for predominantly mild acute pancreatitis in a Nepalese Tertiary Hospital. PLoS One. 2022; 17(1), e0263221.

[12] Kayhan S, Selcan Akyol B, Ergul M, Baysan C. The effect of type of fluid on disease severity in acute pancreatitis treatment. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021; 25(23), 7460–7467.

[13] Lee A, Ko C, Buitrago C, et al. Lactated Ringers vs normal saline resuscitation for mild acute pancreatitis: a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2021; 160(3), 955–957. e4.

[14] Lipinski M, Rydzewska-Rosolowska A, Rydzewski A, Rydzewska G. Fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis: normal saline or lactated Ringer's solution? World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(31), 9367–9372.

[15] Olson K, Twohig P, Sayles H, Eichele D, Antoniak D. S3209 Choice of initial resuscitation fluid in patients admitted for acute pancreatitis. Offic J Am Coll Gastroenterol | ACG. 2021; 116: S1320–S1320.

[16] Reddy YR, Talukder S, Yadav TD, Siddappa PK, Kochhar R. Effect of intravenous fluid resuscitation on inflammatory markers of acute pancreatitis and its clinical outcome. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014; 2(1), 132–135.

[17] Vasu De Van P, Verma GR, Bhalla A, et al. Does the type of fluid used in resuscitation matter in the clinical course of acute pancreatitis? Indian J Gastroenterol. 2013; 32(1), A110.

[18] Wu BU, Hwang JQ, Gardner TH, et al. Lactated Ringer's solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 9(8), 710–717. e1.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine published by Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.