Handling time-varying treatments in observational studies: A scoping review and recommendations

Jiayue Xu , Qiao He , Mingqi Wang , Mei Liu , Qianrui Li , Yan Ren , Minghong Yao , Guowei Li , Kevin Lu , Kang Zou , Wen Wang , Xin Sun

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1) : 95 -105.

PDF
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1) : 95 -105. DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12600
ARTICLE

Handling time-varying treatments in observational studies: A scoping review and recommendations

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Time-varying treatments are common in observational studies. However, when assessing treatment effects, the methodological framework has not been systematically established for handling time-varying treatments. This study aimed to examine the current methods for dealing with time-varying treatments in observational studies and developed practical recommendations.

Methods: We searched PubMed from 2000 to 2021 for methodological articles about time-varying treatments, and qualitatively summarized the current methods for handling time-varying treatments. Subsequently, we developed practical recommendations through interactive internal group discussions and consensus by a panel of external experts.

Results: Of the 36 eligible reports (22 methodological reviews, 10 original studies, 2 tutorials and 2 commentaries), most examined statistical methods for time-varying treatments, and only a few discussed the overarching methodological process. Generally, there were three methodological components to handle time-varying treatments. These included the specification of treatment which may be categorized as three scenarios (i.e., time-independent treatment, static treatment regime, or dynamic treatment regime); definition of treatment status which could involve three approaches (i.e., intention-to-treat, per-protocol, or as-treated approach); and selection of analytic methods. Based on the review results, a methodological workflow and a set of practical recommendations were proposed through two consensus meetings.

Conclusions: There is no consensus process for assessing treatment effects in observational studies with time-varying treatments. Previous efforts were dedicated to developing statistical methods. Our study proposed a stepwise workflow with practical recommendations to assist the practice.

Keywords

observational study / practical recommendations / scoping review / time-varying treatment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiayue Xu, Qiao He, Mingqi Wang, Mei Liu, Qianrui Li, Yan Ren, Minghong Yao, Guowei Li, Kevin Lu, Kang Zou, Wen Wang, Xin Sun. Handling time-varying treatments in observational studies: A scoping review and recommendations. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2024, 17(1): 95-105 DOI:10.1111/jebm.12600

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

261

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/