Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy between virtual portal pressure gradient and hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension

Wei Ping Song , Shuo Zhang , Jing Li , Yu Yang Shao , Ji Chong Xu , Chang Qing Yang

Journal of Digestive Diseases ›› 2024, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9-10) : 603 -614.

PDF
Journal of Digestive Diseases ›› 2024, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9-10) : 603 -614. DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13319
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy between virtual portal pressure gradient and hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of virtual portal pressure gradient (vPPG) and its associated hemodynamic parameters of 3-dimensional (3D) model in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods: Seventy cirrhotic patients who underwent both hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement and vPPG calculation were prospectively collected. The ideal-state model (ISM; n = 44) was defined by sinusoidal PH without hepatic vein shunt or portal vein thrombosis, whereas those not conforming to the criteria were classified as non-ISM (n = 26). Correlation analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between vPPG or its associated 3D hemodynamic parameters and HVPG. The diagnostic and predictive performance of vPPG and HVPG for cirrhotic-related complications was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results: In the ISM group, vPPG-associated hemodynamic parameters including total branch cross-sectional area (S2), average branch cross-sectional area (S), and average portal vein model length (h) were correlated with HVPG (r = 0.592, 0.536, −0.497; all p < 0.001), whereas vPPG was strongly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.832,p < 0.001). In the non-ISM group, vPPG, S2, S, and h were not related to HVPG (all p > 0.05). In the ISM group, both vPPG and HVPG showed significant diagnostic and predictive capabilities for cirrhosis-related complications. While in the non-ISM group, the diagnostic accuracy and predictive efficacy of vPPG surpassed those of HVPG.

Conclusion: HVPG exhibited superior diagnostic and predictive efficacy for cirrhotic PH in the ISM, whereas vPPG showed enhanced performance in non-ISM.

Keywords

cirrhosis / hepatic venous pressure gradient / portal hypertension / virtual portal pressure gradient

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wei Ping Song, Shuo Zhang, Jing Li, Yu Yang Shao, Ji Chong Xu, Chang Qing Yang. Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy between virtual portal pressure gradient and hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension. Journal of Digestive Diseases, 2024, 25(9-10): 603-614 DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.13319

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

148

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/