UV-Induced Fluorescence in the Balance: Mate Choice and Predation Risk in the Female Ornamented Jumping Spiders

Yingna Zhou , Long Yu , Xiaoyan Wang , Daiqin Li , Xin Xu

Integrative Zoology ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2) : 411 -420.

PDF (896KB)
Integrative Zoology ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2) :411 -420. DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12979
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
UV-Induced Fluorescence in the Balance: Mate Choice and Predation Risk in the Female Ornamented Jumping Spiders
Author information +
History +
PDF (896KB)

Abstract

The adaptive significance of female ornamentation remains a central question in evolutionary biology, with ultraviolet (UV)-induced fluorescence emerging as a key area of interest. This study investigates the potential adaptive advantages of female-specific UV-induced fluorescence in male mate choice and predation risk, as fitness costs, using two species of ornate jumping spiders Phintella vittata and Ph. bifurcilinea. In these species, the palps of adult females exhibit UV-induced fluorescence, offering a compelling model to explore the interplay of sexual and natural selection acting on female ornamentation. In male mate-choice trials, males were presented with a choice between a fluorescent (F+, UV-visible) and a non-fluorescent (F–, UV-blocked) female. Males showed pronounced mate preference for F+ females over F– females, that is, spending significantly more time interacting with F+ females, suggesting that fluorescence serves as a sexually selected signal. To assess the potential costs of fluorescence, we tested its effect on predation risk using the spider-eating jumping spider Portia xishan as a predator under F+ and F– conditions. Predation rates were significantly higher for F+ females than for F– females, indicating that UV-induced fluorescence increases detectability by predators. These findings provide empirical evidence of a trade-off: While fluorescence enhances male mate preference, it also increases predation risk. This study is the first to demonstrate the dual roles of fluorescence in sexual signaling and predation in female jumping spiders, challenging traditional male-centric perspectives on mate choice. By integrating behavioral and ecological approaches, this work offers new insights into the evolutionary trade-offs associated with female sexually selected traits.

Keywords

male mate choice / predation risk / trade-offs / UV-induced fluorescence / visual signaling

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yingna Zhou, Long Yu, Xiaoyan Wang, Daiqin Li, Xin Xu. UV-Induced Fluorescence in the Balance: Mate Choice and Predation Risk in the Female Ornamented Jumping Spiders. Integrative Zoology, 2026, 21 (2) : 411-420 DOI:10.1111/1749-4877.12979

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press.

[2]

Andrews, K., S. M. Reed, and S. E. Masta. 2007. “Spiders Fluoresce Variably Across Many Taxa.” Biology Letters 3: 265–267.

[3]

Arnold, K. E., I. P. F. Owens, and N. J. Marshall. 2002. “Fluorescent Signaling in Parrots.” Science 295: 92.

[4]

Barton, K. 2009. “MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference.” Accessed January 22, 2025. https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/mumin/.

[5]

Bell, R. C., and K. R. Zamudio. 2012. “Sexual Dichromatism in Frogs: Natural Selection, Sexual Selection and Unexpected Diversity.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279: 4687–4693.

[6]

Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2004. Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference, a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag.

[7]

Camacho, C., J. J. Negro, I. Redondo, S. Palacios, and P. Sáez-Gómez. 2019. “Correlates of Individual Variation in the Porphyrin-Based Fluorescence of Red-Necked Nightjars (Caprimulgus ruficollis).” Scientific Reports 9: 19115.

[8]

Chenoweth, S. F., and K. McGuigan. 2010. “The Genetic Basis of Sexually Selected Variation.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41: 81–101.

[9]

Clarke, D. N., N. H. Rose, E. De Meulenaere, et al. 2024. “Fluorescent Proteins Generate a Genetic Color Polymorphism and Counteract Oxidative Stress in Intertidal Sea Anemones.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121: e2317017121.

[10]

Cronin, T. W., S. Johnson, N. J. Marshall, and E. J. Warrant. 2014. Visual Ecology. Princeton University Press.

[11]

Crowell, H. L., J. D. Curlis, H. I. Weller, and A. R. Davis Rabosky. 2024. “Ecological Drivers of Ultraviolet Colour Evolution in Snakes.” Nature Communications 15: 5213.

[12]

Czarnecki, C., R. Manderino, and D. Parry. 2022. “Reduced Avian Predation on an Ultraviolet-Fluorescing Caterpillar Model.” The Canadian Entomologist 154: e10.

[13]

Finkbeiner, S. D., D. A. Fishman, D. Osorio, and A. D. Briscoe. 2017. “Ultraviolet and Yellow Reflectance but Not Fluorescence Is Important for Visual Discrimination of Conspecifics by Heliconius erato.” Journal of Experimental Biology 220: 1267–1276.

[14]

Fox, J., and S. Weisberg. 2018. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Sage publications.

[15]

Harland, D. P., D. Li, and R. R. Jackson. 2012. “How Jumping Spider See the World.” In How Animals See the World, edited by O. Lazareva, 133–163. Oxford University Press.

[16]

Jackson, R. R., and S. D. Pollard. 1997. “Jumping Spider Mating Strategies: Sex Among Cannibals in and out of Webs.” In The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids, 340–351. Cambridge University Press.

[17]

Johnsen, S. 2012. The Optics of Life: A Biologist's Guide to Light in Nature. Princeton University Press.

[18]

Kyogoku, D., and T. Sota. 2021. “Sexual Selection Increased Offspring Production via Evolution of Male and Female Traits.” Journal of Evolutionary Biology 34: 501–511.

[19]

Lagorio, M. G., G. B. Cordon, and A. Iriel. 2015. “Reviewing the Relevance of Fluorescence in Biological Systems.” Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 14: 1538–1559.

[20]

LeBas, N. R., and N. J. Marshall. 2000. “The Role of Colour in Signalling and Male Choice in the Agamid Lizard Ctenophorus ornatus.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267: 445–452.

[21]

Lerch, B. A., and M. R. Servedio. 2023. “Predation Drives Complex Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics in Sexually Selected Traits.” PLoS Biology 21: e3002059.

[22]

Li, J., M. L. M. Lim, Z. Zhang, et al. 2008a. “Sexual Dichromatism and Male Colour Morph in Ultraviolet-B Reflectance in Two Populations of the Jumping Spider Phintella vittata (Araneae: Salticidae) from Tropical China.” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 94: 7–20.

[23]

Li, J., Z. Zhang, F. Liu, et al. 2008b. “UVB-Based Mate-Choice Cues Used by Females of the Jumping Spider Phintella vittata.” Current Biology 18: 699–703.

[24]

Lim, M. L. M., and D. Li. 2004. “Courtship and Male-Male Agonistic Behaviour of Cosmophasis umbratica Simon, an Ornate Jumping Spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Singapore.” Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 52: 435–448.

[25]

Lim, M. L. M., and D. Li. 2006. “Extreme Ultraviolet Sexual Dimorphism in Jumping Spiders (Araneae: Salticidae).” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 89: 397–406.

[26]

Lim, M. L. M., J. Li, and D. Li. 2008. “Effect of UV-Reflecting Markings on Female Mate-Choice Decisions in Cosmophasis umbratica, a Jumping Spider from Singapore.” Behavioral Ecology 19: 61–66.

[27]

Lim, M. L. M., M. F. Land, and D. Li. 2007. “Sex-Specific UV and Fluorescence Signals in Jumping Spiders.” Science 315: 481.

[28]

Marshall, J., and S. Johnsen. 2017. “Fluorescence as a Means of Colour Signal Enhancement.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372: 20160335.

[29]

Meadows, M. G., N. Anthes, S. Dangelmayer, et al. 2014. “Red Fluorescence Increases with Depth in Reef Fishes, Supporting a Visual Function, Not UV Protection.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281: 20141211.

[30]

Modarressie, R., I. P. Rick, and T. C. M. Bakker. 2013. “Ultraviolet Reflection Enhances the Risk of Predation in a Vertebrate.” Current Zoology 59: 151–159.

[31]

Pearn, S. M., A. T. D. Bennett, and I. C. Cuthill. 2001. “Ultraviolet Vision, Fluorescence and Mate Choice in a Parrot, the Budgerigar Melopsittacus undulatus.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268: 2273–2279.

[32]

Rosenthal, G. G. 2017. Mate Choice: The Evolution of Sexual Decision Making from Microbes to Humans. Princeton University Press.

[33]

Salih, A., A. Larkum, G. Cox, M. Kühl, and O. Hoegh-Guldberg. 2000. “Fluorescent Pigments in Corals Are Photoprotective.” Nature 408: 850–853.

[34]

Schlupp, I. 2021. Male Choice, Female Competition, and Female Ornaments in Sexual Selection. Oxford University Press.

[35]

Sparks, J. S., R. C. Schelly, W. L. Smith, et al. 2014. “The Covert World of Fish Biofluorescence: A Phylogenetically Widespread and Phenotypically Variable Phenomenon.” PLoS ONE 9: e83259.

[36]

Whitcher, C. 2024. “ The Discovery, Exploration, and Evolution of Treefrog Biofluorescence.” PhD thesis, The Florida State University.

[37]

Whitcher, C., L. Beaver, and E. M. Lemmon. 2024a. “The Effect of Biofluorescence on Predation Upon Cope's Gray Treefrog: A Clay Model Experiment.” Behavioural Processes 215: 104996.

[38]

Whitcher, C., S. R. Ron, F. Ayala-Varela, et al. 2024b. “Evidence for Ecological Tuning of Anuran Biofluorescent Signals.” Nature Communications 15: 8884.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Integrative Zoology published by International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (896KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/