Nephila spider male aggregation: preference for optimal female size and web clustering

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism theory predicts biased operational sex ratios (OSRs) and an uneven distribution of males among certain females. We studied this phenomenon through a field census of the giant wood spider Nephila pilipes (family Nephilidae) in Singapore, a species where females are, on average, 6.9 times larger than males. Specifically, we tested two hypotheses concerning male distribution, given their tendency to aggregate in certain female webs. The optimal female size hypothesis predicts that males would predominantly occupy webs of intermediate-sized females. The web clustering hypothesis posits that more males would be found in webs closer together compared to those farther apart. Our snapshot census revealed a female-biased OSR (females: males = 1.85) with an uneven distribution of males in female webs. Most males were found in webs of intermediate-sized females aligning with the optimal female size hypothesis. Proximity among female webs was indicative of male presence, lending support to the web clustering hypothesis. While our study's limited sample size warrants caution, we conclude that in N. pilipes, male occupation of female webs is facilitated by the clustering of webs, and males prefer to cohabit with optimally sized, receptive females.

Keywords

eSSD / Nephila pilipes / operational sex ratios / sexual selection / sexual size dimorphism

References

[1] Agnarsson I (2003). Spider webs as habitat patches—the distribution of kleptoparasites (Argyrodes, Theridiidae) among host webs (Nephila, Tetragnathidae). Journal of Arachnology 31, 344-349.

[2] Agnarsson I, Goodnight C, Higgins L (2024). Developmental asynchrony: A potential cost of extreme sexual size dimorphism in seasonal environments. Journal of Arachnology 52, 75-85.

[3] Blanckenhorn WU, Dixon AFG, Fairbairn DJ et al. (2007). Proximate causes of Rensch's Rule: Does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time? The American Naturalist 169, 245-257.

[4] Cheng R-C, Kuntner M (2014). Phylogeny suggests non-directional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders. Evolution 68, 2861-2872.

[5] Cheng RC, Zhang S, Chen YC et al. (2017). Nutrient intake determines post-maturity molting in the golden orb-web spider Nephila pilipes (Araneae: Araneidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 220, 2260-2264.

[6] Danielson-François A, Hou C, Cole N, Tso IM (2012). Scramble competition for moulting females as a driving force for extreme male dwarfism in spiders. Animal Behaviour 84, 937-945.

[7] Elgar MA, Bruce MJ, Champion de Crespigny FE et al. (2003). Male mate choice and patterns of paternity in the polyandrous, sexually cannibalistic orb-web spider Nephila plumipes. Australian Journal of Zoology 51, 357-365.

[8] Fairbairn DJ (2007). Introduction: The enigma of sexual size dimorphism. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T, eds. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 1-10.

[9] Foellmer MW, Fairbairn DJ (2005). Competing dwarf males: Sexual selection in an orb-weaving spider. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 629-641.

[10] Foellmer MW, Moya-Laraño J (2007). Sexual size dimorphism in spiders: Patterns and processes. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T, eds. Sex, Size, and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 71-82.

[11] Hardy ICW, ed (2002). Sex Ratios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

[12] Harvey MS, Austin AD, Adams M (2007). The systematics and biology of the spider genus Nephila (Araneae: Nephilidae) in the Australasian region. Invertebrate Systematics 21, 407-451.

[13] Higgins L (2000). The interaction of season length and development time alters size at maturity. Oecologia 122, 51-59.

[14] Higgins L (2002). Female gigantism in a New Guinea population of the spider Nephila maculata. Oikos 99, 377-385.

[15] Kasumovic MM, Bruce MJ, Andrade MCB, Herberstein ME (2008). Spatial and temporal demographic variation drives within-season fluctuations in sexual selection. Evolution 62, 2316-2325.

[16] Kuntner M, Coddington JA (2020). Sexual size dimorphism: Evolution and perils of extreme phenotypes in spiders. Annual Review of Entomology 65, 57-80.

[17] Kuntner M, Coddington JA, Schneider JM (2009). Intersexual arms race? Genital coevolution in nephilid spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae). Evolution 63, 1451-1463.

[18] Kuntner M, Gregorič M, Li D (2010). Mass predicts web asymmetry in Nephila spiders. Naturwissenschaften 97, 1097-1105.

[19] Kuntner M, Gregorič M, Zhang S, Kralj-Fišer S, Li D (2012a). Mating plugs in polyandrous giants: Which sex produces them, when, how and why? PLoS ONE 7, e40939.

[20] Kuntner M, Hamilton CA, Cheng RC et al. (2019). Golden orbweavers ignore biological rules: Phylogenomic and comparative analyses unravel a complex evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Systematic Biology 68, 555-572.

[21] Kuntner M, Kralj-Fišer S, Schneider JM, Li D (2009). Mate plugging via genital mutilation in nephilid spiders: An evolutionary hypothesis. Journal of Zoology 277, 257-266.

[22] Kuntner M, Zhang S, Gregorič M, Li D (2012b). Nephila female gigantism attained through post-maturity molting. Journal of Arachnology 40, 345-347.

[23] MacLeod EC, Andrade MCB (2014). Strong, convergent male mate choice along two preference axes in field populations of black widow spiders. Animal Behaviour 89, 163-169.

[24] Miller JA (2007). Repeated evolution of male sacrifice behavior in spiders correlated with genital mutilation. Evolution 61, 1301-1315.

[25] Pollo P, Muniz DG, Santos ESA (2019). Be prudent if it fits you well: Male mate choice depends on male size in a golden orb-weaver spider. Animal Behaviour 156, 11-20.

[26] Reeve JP, Fairbairn DJ (1996). Sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on body size: An empirical test of the quantitative genetic model. Evolution 50, 1927-1938.

[27] Reeve JP, Fairbairn DJ (2001). Predicting the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, 244-254.

[28] Tuni C, Berger-Tal R (2012). Male preference and female cues: Males assess female sexual maturity and mating status in a web-building spider. Behavioral Ecology 23, 582-587.

[29] Vollrath F, Parker GA (1992). Sexual dimorphism and distorted sex ratios in spiders. Nature 360, 156-159.

[30] Webb TJ, Freckleton RP (2007). Only half right: Species with female-biased sexual size dimorphism consistently break Rensch's rule. PLoS ONE 2, e897.

[31] Wilder SM, Rypstra AL (2008). Sexual size dimorphism predicts the frequency of sexual cannibalism within and among species of spiders. The American Naturalist 172, 431-440.

[32] Zhang S, Kuntner M, Li D (2011). Mate binding: Male adaptation to sexual conflict in the golden orb-web spider (Nephilidae: Nephila pilipes). Animal Behaviour 82, 1299-1304.

[33] Zhang S, Yu L, Tan M et al. (2022). Male mating strategies to counter sexual conflict in spiders. Communications Biology 5, 534.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Integrative Zoology published by International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.