Defensive behaviors and c-fos expression in the midbrain

Abstract

Pavlovian fear conditioning serves as a valuable method for investigating species-specific defensive reactions (SSDRs) such as freezing and flight responses. The present study examines the role of white noise under different experimental conditions. Given that white noise has been shown to elicit both conditional (associative) and unconditional (nonassociative) defensive responses, we compared the response to noise following three separate training conditions: shock-only, white noise paired with shock, and context-only. Results showed that baseline freezing level significantly changed across groups: Both the shock-only group and the white noise paired with shock group froze more than the context-only group on the test day. White noise evoked differential freezing between groups on day 2: The shock-only group froze more than the context-only group although both groups were never exposed to white noise during training. Further, an activity burst triggered by white noise was similar for the shock-only and white noise paired with shock groups during testing, although shock-only group was never exposed to white noise stimuli during training. This aligned with c-fos data, indicating similar c-fos activity levels across different periaqueductal gray (PAG) regions for both shock-only and white noise paired with shock groups. However, the driving force behind c-fos activation—whether freezing, activity burst, or a combination of both—remains uncertain, warranting further analysis to explore specific correlations between SSDRs and c-fos activity within the PAG and related brain areas.

Keywords

fear learning / immediate early gene expression / panic / periaqueductal gray / species-specific defensive reactions / white noise stimulation

References

[1] Amano K, Tanikawa T, Iseki H et al. (1978). Single neuron analysis of the human midbrain tegmentum. Rostral mecencephalic reticulotomy for pain relief. Applied Neurophysiology 41, 66-78.

[2] Baisley SK, Cloninger CL, Bakshi VP (2011). Fos expression following regimens of predator stress versus footshock that differentially affect prepulse inhibition in rats. Physiology & Behavior 104, 796-803.

[3] Beitz AJ, Shepard RD, Wells WE (1983). The periaqueductal gray-raphe magnus projection contains somatostatin, neurotensin and serotonin but not cholecystokinin. Brain Research 261, 132-137.

[4] Bolles RC (1970). Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychological Review 77, 32.

[5] Brown JS, Kalish HI, Farber IE (1951). Conditioned fear as revealed by magnitude of startle response to an auditory stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41, 317.

[6] Bullitt E (1990). Expression of C-fos-like protein as a marker for neuronal activity following noxious stimulation in the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 296, 517-530.

[7] Calhoun CA, Lattouf C, Lewis V, Barrientos H, Donaldson ST (2023). Chronic mild stress induces differential depression-like symptoms and c-Fos and 5HT1A protein levels in high-anxiety female Long Evans rats. Behavioural Brain Research 438, 114202.

[8] Canteras NS, Goto M (1999). Fos-like immunoreactivity in the periaqueductal gray of rats exposed to a natural predator. Neuroreport 10, 413-418.

[9] Carboni L, El Khoury A, Beiderbeck DI, Neumann ID, Mathé AA (2022). Neuropeptide Y, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and neurokinin A in brain regions of HAB rats correlate with anxiety-like behaviours. European Neuropsychopharmacology 57, 1-14.

[10] Cardoso JCR, Garcia MG, Power DM (2020). Tracing the origins of the pituitary adenylate-cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP). Frontiers in Neuroscience 14, 366.

[11] Comoli E, Ribeiro-Barbosa ER, Canteras NS (2003). Predatory hunting and exposure to a live predator induce opposite patterns of Fos immunoreactivity in the PAG. Behavioural Brain Research 138, 17-28.

[12] Condro MC, Matynia A, Foster NN et al. (2016). High-resolution characterization of a PACAP-EGFP transgenic mouse model for mapping PACAP-expressing neurons. Journal of Comparative Neurology 524, 3827-3848.

[13] Davis M, Astrachan DI (1978). Conditioned fear and startle magnitude: Effects of different footshock or backshock intensities used in training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 4, 95.

[14] Davis M, Falls WA, Campeau S, Kim M (1993). Fear-potentiated startle: A neural and pharmacological analysis. Behavioural Brain Research 58, 175-198.

[15] De Oca BM, DeCola JP, Maren S et al. (1998). Distinct regions of the periaqueductal gray are involved in the acquisition and expression of defensive responses. Journal of Neuroscience 18, 3426-3432.

[16] Della Valle R, Mohammadmirzaei N, Knox D (2019). Single prolonged stress alters neural activation in the periacqueductal gray and midline thalamic nuclei during emotional learning and memory. Learning & Memory 26, 1-9.

[17] Dong P, Wang H, Shen XF et al. (2019). A novel cortico-intrathalamic circuit for flight behavior. Nature Neuroscience 22, 941-949.

[18] Fadok JP, Krabbe S, Markovic M et al. (2017). A competitive inhibitory circuit for selection of active and passive fear responses. Nature 542, 96-100.

[19] Fanselow MS (1980). Conditioned and unconditional components of post-shock freezing. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science 15, 177-182.

[20] Fanselow MS (1982). The postshock activity burst. Animal Learning & Behavior 10, 448-454.

[21] Fanselow MS (1989). The adaptive function of conditioned defensive behavior: An ecological approach to Pavlovian stimulus-substitution theory. In: Blanchard RJ, Brain PF, Blanchard DC, Parmigiani S, eds. Ethoexperimental Approaches to the Study of Behavior. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 151-166.

[22] Fanselow MS (1990). Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior 3, 264-270.

[23] Fanselow MS (1991). The midbrain periaqueductal gray as coordinator of action in response to fear and anxiety. In: Depaulis A, Bandler R, eds. The Midbrain Periaqueductal Gray Matter: Functional, Anatomical and Immunohistochemical Organization. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 151-173.

[24] Fanselow MS (2022). Negative valence systems: Sustained threat and the predatory imminence continuum. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences 5, 467-477.

[25] Fanselow MS, Hoffman AN, Zhuravka I (2019). Timing and the transition between modes in the defensive behavior system. Behavioural Processes 166, 103890.

[26] Fanselow MS, Lester LS (1988). A functional behavioristic approach to aversively motivated behavior: Predatory imminence as a determinant of the topography of defensive behavior. In: Bolles RC, BeecheR MD, eds. Evolution and Learning. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 185-211.

[27] Fanselow MS, Sterlace SR (2014). Pavlovian fear conditioning: Function, cause, and treatment. In: McSweeney FK, Murphy ES, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Operant and Classical Conditioning. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 117-141.

[28] Furlong TM, Mcdowall LM, Horiuchi J, Polson JW, Dampney RAL (2014). The effect of air puff stress on c-Fos expression in rat hypothalamus and brainstem: Central circuitry mediating sympathoexcitation and baroreflex resetting. European Journal of Neuroscience 39, 1429-1438.

[29] Gaszner B, Kormos V, Kozicz T et al. (2012). The behavioral phenotype of pituitary adenylate-cyclase activating polypeptide-deficient mice in anxiety and depression tests is accompanied by blunted c-Fos expression in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, central projecting Edinger-Westphal nucleus, ventral lateral septum, and dorsal raphe nucleus. Neuroscience 202, 283-299.

[30] Goode TD, Ressler RL, Acca GM, Miles OW, Maren S (2019). Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis regulates fear to unpredictable threat signals. eLife 8, e46525.

[31] Hashimoto H, Hagihara N, Koga K et al. (2000). Synergistic induction of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) gene expression by nerve growth factor and PACAP in PC12 cells. Journal of Neurochemistry 74, 501-507.

[32] Hersman S, Allen D, Hashimoto M, Brito SI, Anthony TE (2020). Stimulus salience determines defensive behaviors elicited by aversively conditioned serial compound auditory stimuli. eLife 9, e53803.

[33] Huang LK, Wang MJJ (1995). Image thresholding by minimizing the measures of fuzziness. Pattern Recognition 28, 41-51.

[34] Koay G, Heffner RS, Heffner HE (2002). Behavioral audiograms of homozygous med^J mutant mice with sodium channel deficiency and unaffected controls. Hearing Research 171, 111-118.

[35] Kovács KJ (2008). Measurement of immediate-early gene activation-c-fos and beyond. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 20, 665-672.

[36] Li W, Chang M, Peng YL et al. (2009). Neuropeptide S produces antinociceptive effects at the supraspinal level in mice. Regulatory Peptides 156, 90-95.

[37] Mobbs D, Petrovic P, Marchant JL et al. (2007). When fear is near: Threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans. Science 317, 1079-1083.

[38] Nashold BS , Wilson NP, Slaughter GS (1974). The midbrain and pain. In: Bonica JJ, ed. Advances in Neurology, vol. 4: International Symposium on Pain. Raven Press, New York, pp. 191-196.

[39] Pavlov IP (1927). Conditioned Reflexes. Dover, New York.

[40] Perusini JN, Fanselow MS (2015). Neurobehavioral perspectives on the distinction between fear and anxiety. Learning & Memory 22, 417-425.

[41] Rajbhandari AK, Octeau CJ, Gonzalez S et al. (2021). A basomedial amygdala to intercalated cells microcircuit expressing PACAP and its receptor PAC1 regulates contextual fear. Journal of Neuroscience 41, 3446-3461.

[42] Reichling DB (1991). GABAergic neuronal circuitry in the periaqueductal gray matter. In: Depaulis A, Bandler R, eds. The Midbrain Periaqueductal Gray Matter: Functional, Anatomical and Immunohistochemical Organization. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 329-344.

[43] Sandner G, Dessort D, Schmitt P, Karli P (1981). Distribution of GABA in the periaqueductal gray matter. Effects of medial hypothalamic lesions. Brain Research 224, 279-290.

[44] Singh A, Xie Y, Davis A, Wang ZJ (2022). Early social isolation stress increases addiction vulnerability to heroin and alters c-Fos expression in the mesocorticolimbic system. Psychopharmacology 239, 1081-1095.

[45] Totty MS, Warren N, Huddleston I et al. (2021). Behavioral and brain mechanisms mediating conditioned flight behavior in rats. Scientific Reports 11, 8215.

[46] Trott JM, Hoffman AN, Zhuravka I, Fanselow MS (2022). Conditional and unconditional components of aversively motivated freezing, flight and darting in mice. eLife 11, e75663.

[47] Yavas E, Gonzalez S, Fanselow MS (2019). Interactions between the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and amygdala support complex learning and memory. F1000Research 8(F1000 Faculty Rev), 1292.

[48] Yavas E, Trott JM, Fanselow MS (2021). Sexually dimorphic muscarinic acetylcholine receptor modulation of contextual fear learning in the dentate gyrus. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 185, 107528.

[49] Yavas E, Zhuravka I, Fanselow MS (2023). PAC1 receptor modulation of freezing and flight behavior in periaqueductal gray. Genes, Brain, and Behavior 22, e12873.

[50] Yin W, Mei L, Sun T et al. (2020). A central amygdala-ventrolateral periaqueductal gray matter pathway for pain in a mouse model of depression-like behavior. Anesthesiology 132, 1175-1196.

[51] Young RF (1989). Brain and spinal stimulation: How and to whom! Clinical Neurosurgery 35, 429-447.

[52] Zambetti PR, Schuessler BP, Lecamp BE et al. (2022). Ecological analysis of Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats. Communications Biology 5, 830.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Integrative Zoology published by International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.