Fecal bacterial communities of the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) reflect captivity status—Implications for conservation and management

Ashley M. DUNGAN , Jessica L. THOMAS

Integrative Zoology ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6) : 1211 -1223.

PDF
Integrative Zoology ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6) : 1211 -1223. DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12865
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Fecal bacterial communities of the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) reflect captivity status—Implications for conservation and management

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The duck-billed platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) is currently listed as near-threatened. A key part of the conservation strategy for this species is its captive maintenance; however, captive animals often have dysbiotic gut bacterial microbiomes. Here, for the first time, we characterize the gut microbiome of wild platypus via fecal samples using high-throughput sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and identify microbial biomarkers of captivity in this species. At the phylum level, Firmicutes (50.4%) predominated among all platypuses, followed by Proteobacteria (28.7%), Fusobacteria (13.4%), and Bacteroidota (6.9%), with 21 “core” bacteria identified. Captive individuals did not differ in their microbial α-diversity compared to wild platypus but had significantly different community composition (β-diversity) and exhibited higher abundances of Enterococcus, which are potential pathogenic bacteria. Four taxa were identified as biomarkers of wild platypus, including Rickettsiella,Epulopiscium,Clostridium, and Cetobacterium. This contrast in gut microbiome composition between wild and captive platypus is an essential insight for guiding conservation management, as the rewilding of captive animal microbiomes is a new and emerging tool to improve captive animal health, maximize captive breeding efforts, and give reintroduced or translocated animals the best chance of survival.

Keywords

captivity / conservation / host-associated / monotreme / symbiosis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ashley M. DUNGAN, Jessica L. THOMAS. Fecal bacterial communities of the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) reflect captivity status—Implications for conservation and management. Integrative Zoology, 2024, 19(6): 1211-1223 DOI:10.1111/1749-4877.12865

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ahasan MS,Waltzek TB,Huerlimann R,Ariel E (2017). Fecal bacterial communities of wild-captured and stranded green turtles (Chelonia mydas) on the Great Barrier Reef. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 93,fix139.

[2]

Alfano N,Courtiol A,Vielgrader H,Timms P,Roca AL,Greenwood AD (2015). Variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: Effect of body region and captivity status. Scientific Reports 5,10189.

[3]

Amato KR (2013). Co-evolution in context: The importance of studying gut microbiomes in wild animals. Microbiome Science and Medicine 1,10–29.

[4]

Auguie B,Antonov A,Auguie MB (2017). Package ‘gridExtra’. Miscellaneous functions for “grid” graphics, 9. Available on URL: http://cran.dcc.fc.up.pt/web/packages/gridExtra/gridExtra.pdf

[5]

Becker AAMJ, Harrison SWR,Whitehouse-Tedd G,Budd JA,Whitehouse-Tedd KM (2020). Integrating gut bacterial diversity and captive husbandry to optimize vulture conservation. Frontiers in Microbiology 11,1025.

[6]

Bino G,Kingsford RT,Archer M et al. (2019). The platypus: Evolutionary history, biology, and an uncertain future. Journal of Mammalogy 100,308–327.

[7]

Bino G,Kingsford RT,Wintle BA (2020). A stitch in time – Synergistic impacts to platypus metapopulation extinction risk. Biological Conservation 242,108399.

[8]

Bletz MC,Loudon AH,Becker MH et al. (2013). Mitigating amphibian chytridiomycosis with bioaugmentation: Characteristics of effective probiotics and strategies for their selection and use. Ecology Letters 16,807–820.

[9]

Blyton MDJ,Soo RM,Whisson D et al. (2019). Faecal inoculations alter the gastrointestinal microbiome and allow dietary expansion in a wild specialist herbivore, the koala. Animal Microbiome 1,6.

[10]

Bokulich NA,Kaehler BD,Rideout JR et al. (2018). Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6,90.

[11]

Bolyen E,Rideout JR,Dillon MR et al. (2019). Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nature Biotechnology 37,852–857.

[12]

Boukerb AM,Noël C,Quenot E et al. (2021). Comparative analysis of fecal microbiomes from wild waterbirds to poultry, cattle, pigs, and wastewater treatment plants for a microbial source tracking approach. Frontiers in Microbiology 12,697553.

[13]

Brice KL,Trivedi P,Jeffries TC et al. (2019). The Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) faecal microbiome differs with diet in a wild population. PeerJ 7,e6534.

[14]

Burke C,Burnard D,Polkinghorne A,Webb J,Huston WM (2018). Cloacal and ocular microbiota of the endangered Australian northern quoll. Microorganisms 6,68.

[15]

Buthgamuwa I,Fenelon JC,Roser A,Meer H,Johnston SD,Dungan AM (2023). Gut microbiota in the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) shows stability across gestation. Microbiologyopen 12, e1392.

[16]

Callahan BJ,Mcmurdie PJ,Rosen MJ,Han AW,Johnson AJOA, Holmes SP (2016). DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods 13,581–583.

[17]

Cao Y,Dong Q,Wang D,Zhang P,Liu Y,Niu C (2022). microbiomeMarker: An R/Bioconductor package for microbiome marker identification and visualization. Bioinformatics 38,4027–4029.

[18]

Caporaso JG,Lauber CL,Walters WA et al. (2012). Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. The ISME Journal 6,1621–1624.

[19]

Caporaso JG,Lauber CL,Walters WA et al. (2011). Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. PNAS 108,4516–4522.

[20]

Chen S,Luo S,Yan C (2021). Gut microbiota implications for health and welfare in farm animals: A review. Animals (Basel) 12,93.

[21]

Cheng Y,Fox S,Pemberton D,Hogg C,Papenfuss AT,Belov K (2015). The Tasmanian devil microbiome-implications for conservation and management. Microbiome 3,76.

[22]

Chong R,Cheng Y,Hogg CJ,Belov K (2020). Marsupial gut microbiome. Frontiers in Microbiology 11,1058.

[23]

Chong R,Grueber CE,Fox S et al. (2019). Looking like the locals—Gut microbiome changes post-release in an endangered species. Animal Microbiome 1,8.

[24]

Conde DA,Flesness N,Colchero F,Jones OR,Scheuerlein A (2011). Conservation. An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science 331,1390–1391.

[25]

Conway JR,Lex A,Gehlenborg N (2017). UpSetR: An R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics 33,2938–2940.

[26]

Dallas JW,Warne RW (2023). Captivity and animal microbiomes: Potential roles of microbiota for influencing animal conservation. Microbial Ecology 85,820–838.

[27]

David LA,Maurice CF,Carmody RN et al. (2014). Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505,559–563.

[28]

Davis NM,Proctor DM,Holmes SP,Relman DA,Callahan BJ (2018). Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6,1–14.

[29]

Diaz J,Reese AT (2021). Possibilities and limits for using the gut microbiome to improve captive animal health. Animal Microbiome 3,89.

[30]

Dubin K,Pamer EG (2014). Enterococci and their interactions with the intestinal microbiome. Microbiology Spectrum 5,

[31]

Dungan AM,Van Oppen MJH,Blackall LL (2021). Short-term exposure to sterile seawater reduces bacterial community diversity in the sea anemone,Exaiptasia diaphana. Frontiers in Marine Science 7,599314.

[32]

Fonknechten N,Chaussonnerie S,Tricot S et al. (2010). Clostridium sticklandii, a specialist in amino acid degradation: revisiting its metabolism through its genome sequence. BMC Genomics [Electronic Resource] 11,555.

[33]

Garcias-Bonet N,Roik A,Tierney B et al. (2024). Horizon scanning the application of probiotics for wildlife. Trends in Microbiology 32,252–269.

[34]

Greay TL,Evasco KL,Evans ML et al. (2021). Illuminating the bacterial microbiome of Australian ticks with 16S and Rickettsia-specific next-generation sequencing. Current Research in Parasitology & Vector-borne Diseases 1,100037.

[35]

Hartley M (2016). Assessing risk factors for reproductive failure and associated welfare impacts in elephants in European zoos. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research 4,127–138.

[36]

Holland N,Jackson SM (2006). Reproductive behaviour and food consumption associated with the captive breeding of platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus). Journal of Zoology 256,279–288.

[37]

Hope RM,Hope MRM,Collate’CI R (2013). Package ‘Rmisc’. group 101,2. Available on URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rmisc/Rmisc.pdf

[38]

Huang S,Ji S,Yan H et al. (2020). The day-to-day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows. Microbiologyopen 9,e990.

[39]

Koh A,De Vadder F,Kovatcheva-Datchary P,Bäckhed F (2016). From dietary fiber to host physiology: Short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell 165,1332–1345.

[40]

Korpita TM,Muths EL,Watry MK,Mckenzie VJ (2023). Captivity, reintroductions, and the rewilding of amphibian-associated bacterial communities. Microbial Ecology 86,2271–2281.

[41]

Koziol A,Odriozola I,Leonard A et al. (2023). Mammals show distinct functional gut microbiome dynamics to identical series of environmental stressors. mBio 14,e0160623.

[42]

Krawczyk B,Wityk P,Gałęcka M,Michalik M (2021). The many faces of Enterococcus spp.—Commensal, probiotic and opportunistic pathogen. Microorganisms 9,1900.

[43]

Kueneman JG,Bletz MC,Becker M et al. (2022). Effects of captivity and rewilding on amphibian skin microbiomes. Biological Conservation 271,109576.

[44]

Kueneman JG,Woodhams DC,Harris R,Archer HM,Knight R,Mckenzie VJ (2016). Probiotic treatment restores protection against lethal fungal infection lost during amphibian captivity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283,20161553.

[45]

Lahti L,Shetty S (2018). Introduction to the microbiome R package. Preprint at https://microbiome.github.io/tutorials

[46]

Larsson J (2018). eulerr: area-proportional Euler diagrams with ellipses. Available on URL: https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8934042/file/8935805.pdf

[47]

Lemon J,Bolker B,Oom S et al. (2015). Package ‘plotrix’. R Development Core Team,Vienna.

[48]

Leulmi H,Aouadi A,Bitam I et al. (2016). Detection of Bartonella tamiae,Coxiella burnetii and rickettsiae in arthropods and tissues from wild and domestic animals in northeastern Algeria. Parasit Vectors 9,27.

[49]

Ley RE,Hamady M,Lozupone C et al. (2008). Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 320,1647–1651.

[50]

Maidment T,Eisenhofer R (2023). Pouch bacteria: An understudied and potentially important facet of marsupial reproduction. Microbiology Australia 44,41–44.

[51]

Martin M (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. Journal 17,3.

[52]

Martinez Arbizu P (2020). pairwiseAdonis: Pairwise multilevel comparison using adonis R package. Version 0.4. Available on URL: https://github.com/pmartinezarbizu/pairwiseAdonis

[53]

Mason GJ (2010). Species differences in responses to captivity: Stress, welfare and the comparative method. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25,713–721.

[54]

McFall-Ngai M,Hadfield MG,Bosch TCG et al. (2013). Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. PNAS 110,3229–3236.

[55]

McKay HF,Mirrabooka G (2001). Australian Aboriginal Tales from the Dreaming. Libraries Unlimited,Englewood, CO.

[56]

McKenzie VJ,Kueneman JG,Harris RN (2018). Probiotics as a tool for disease mitigation in wildlife: Insights from food production and medicine. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1429,18–30.

[57]

McLachlan-Troup TA,Nicol SC,Dickman CR (2020). Platypus predation has differential effects on aquatic invertebrates in contrasting stream and lake ecosystems. Scientific Reports 10,13043.

[58]

McMurdie PJ,Holmes S (2013). phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8,e61217.

[59]

Miller AW,Oakeson KF,Dale C,Dearing MD (2016). Microbial community transplant results in increased and long-term oxalate degradation. Microbial Ecology 72,470–478.

[60]

Moeller AH,Sanders JG (2020). Roles of the gut microbiota in the adaptive evolution of mammalian species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 375,20190597.

[61]

Muegge BD,Kuczynski J,Knights D et al. (2011). Diet drives convergence in gut microbiome functions across mammalian phylogeny and within humans. Science 332,970–974.

[62]

Mueller UG,Sachs JL (2015). Engineering microbiomes to improve plant and animal health. Trends in Microbiology 23,606–617.

[63]

Nelson TM,Rogers TL,Carlini AR,Brown MV (2013). Diet and phylogeny shape the gut microbiota of Antarctic seals: A comparison of wild and captive animals. Environmental Microbiology 15,1132–1145.

[64]

Ngugi DK,Miyake S,Cahill M et al. (2017). Genomic diversification of giant enteric symbionts reflects host dietary lifestyles. PNAS 114,E7592–E7601.

[65]

Oksanen J (2007). Vegan: community ecology package. R package. Version 1.8-5. Available from URL: http://www.cran.r-project.org

[66]

Perry T,West E,Eisenhofer R et al. (2022). Characterising the gut microbiomes in wild and captive short-beaked echidnas reveals diet-associated changes. Frontiers in Microbiology 13,687115.

[67]

Pike E (1997). Parable of the platypus dreaming. Nelen Yubu 66,33–37.

[68]

Pinheiro J,Bates D,Debroy S,Sarkar D,Team RC (2007). Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version 3,1–89.

[69]

R Core Team (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna, Austria.

[70]

Rojas CA,Ramírez-Barahona S,Holekamp KE,Theis KR (2021). Host phylogeny and host ecology structure the mammalian gut microbiota at different taxonomic scales. Animal Microbiome 3,33.

[71]

San Juan PA,Castro I,Dhami MK (2021). Captivity reduces diversity and shifts composition of the brown Kiwi microbiome. Animal Microbiome 3,48.

[72]

Searle SR,Speed FM,Milliken GA (1980). Population marginal means in the linear model: An alternative to least squares means. The American Statistician 34,216–221.

[73]

Shaw G (1799). Platypus anatinus, the duck-billed platypus. The naturalists’ miscellany: or coloured figures of natural objects drawn and described from nature. Vol. 10, No. 118 (7 unnumbered pages). F. P. Nodder and Co., London (not seen, cited in A dictionary catalogue of the Blacker-Wood Library of Zoology and Ornithology, 8:263).

[74]

Sun Y,Sun Y,Shi Z et al. (2019). Gut microbiota of wild and captive alpine musk deer (Moschus chrysogaster). Frontiers in Microbiology 10,3156.

[75]

Suzuki A,Shirakata C,Anzai H,Sumiyama D,Suzuki M (2022). Vitamin B12 biosynthesis of Cetobacterium ceti isolated from the intestinal content of captive common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Microbiology (Reading) 168,001244.

[76]

Suzuki TA (2017). Links between natural variation in the microbiome and host fitness in wild mammals. Integrative and Comparative Biology 57,756–769.

[77]

Thomas JL,Parrott ML,Handasyde KA,Temple-Smith P (2020). Maternal care of platypus nestlings (Ornithorhynchus anatinus). Australian Mammalogy 42,283–292.

[78]

Trevelline BK,Fontaine SS,Hartup BK,Kohl KD (2019). Conservation biology needs a microbial renaissance: A call for the consideration of host-associated microbiota in wildlife management practices. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286,20182448.

[79]

Turnbaugh PJ,Ley RE,Mahowald MA,Magrini V,Mardis ER,Gordon JI (2006). An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444,1027–1031.

[80]

Wang X,Wang Z,Pan H et al. (2021). Captivity influences the gut microbiome of Rhinopithecus roxellana. Frontiers in Microbiology 12,763022.

[81]

Wasimuddin, Menke S,Melzheimer J et al. (2017). Gut microbiomes of free-ranging and captive Namibian cheetahs: Diversity, putative functions and occurrence of potential pathogens. Molecular Ecology 26,5515–5527.

[82]

Wen Y,Li S,Wang Z et al. (2022). Intestinal microbial diversity of free-range and captive yak in Qinghai Province. Microorganisms 10,13.

[83]

West AG,Waite DW,Deines P et al. (2019). The microbiome in threatened species conservation. Biological Conservation 229,85–98.

[84]

Wickham H (2020). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Version 3.3. 1. Springer-Verlag,New York. Available from URL: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org

[85]

Woinarski J,Burbidge A (2016). Ornithorhynchus anatinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016,T40488A21964009.

[86]

Wu X,Wei Q,Wang X,Shang Y,Zhang H (2022). Evolutionary and dietary relationships of wild mammals based on the gut microbiome. Gene 808,145999.

[87]

Xia Y,Wang M,Gao F,Lu M,Chen G (2020). Effects of dietary probiotic supplementation on the growth, gut health and disease resistance of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animal Nutrition 6,69–79.

[88]

Xia Y,Xu X,Chen H et al. (2022). Effects of captive and primate-focused tourism on the gut microbiome of Tibetan macaques. Frontiers in Microbiology 13,1023898.

[89]

Xu S,Zhan L,Tang W et al. (2023). MicrobiotaProcess: A comprehensive R package for deep mining microbiome. Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) 4,100388.

[90]

Zhang F,Xu NA,Wang W,Yu Y,Wu S (2021). The gut microbiome of the Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) reveals its adaptation to specialized myrmecophagy. PeerJ 9,e11490.

[91]

Zhou Z,Tang L,Yan L et al. (2022). Wild and captive environments drive the convergence of gut microbiota and impact health in threatened equids. Frontiers in Microbiology 13,832410.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Integrative Zoology published by International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

185

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/