Identifying habitat modification by Chinese pangolin in subtropical forests of southern China

Abstract

The excavation of Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) is expected to alter habitat heterogeneity and thus affect the functioning and structure of forest ecosystems. In this study, the bioturbation of Chinese pangolin on forest soils in three regions (Heping, Tianjingshan, and Wuqinzhang) across Guangdong province was quantified. Overall, a mean of 2.66 m³·ha⁻¹ and 83.1 m²·ha⁻¹ of burrows and bare mounds, respectively, was excavated by Chinese pangolin; the disturbed soils had significantly lower water content and P, C, available N concentrations, but higher bulk density, pH, and microbial abundance than those undisturbed soils. The unevenness of habitat heterogeneity improvement was mainly ascribed to the stronger soil disturbance caused in resting burrows by pangolins. Patterns of altering habitat heterogeneity were site-specific, with high-intensity soil disturbance occurring most in shrubs, meadows, steep habitats at high elevations, and mountain tops in Heping, while in broad-leaved, coniferous and mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forests away from human settlements in Tianjingshan and upper mountains at high elevations far away from roads and human settlements in Wuqinzhang. Road networks are the main interference for the burrow distribution in Heping and Wuqinzhang and should be programmed.

Keywords

burrow volume / habitat heterogeneity / Manis pentadactyla / mound coverage area / soil property / soil turnover

References

[1] Akaike H (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19, 716-723.

[2] Bancroft WJ, Hill D, Roberts D (2004). A new method for calculating volume of excavated burrows: The geomorphic impact of Wedge-Tailed Shearwater burrows on Rottnest Island. Functional Ecology 18, 752-759.

[3] Bancroft WJ, Roberts JD, Garkaklis MJ (2005). Burrowing sea birds drive decreased diversity and structural complexity, and increased productivity in insular-vegetation communities. Australian Journal of Botany 53, 231-241.

[4] Betts MG, Wolf C, Pfeifer M et al. (2019). Extinction filters mediate the global effects of habitat fragmentation on animals. Science 366, 1236-1239.

[5] Bhandari N, Chalise MK (2014). Habitat and distribution of Chinese pangolin (Manispentadactyla Linnaeus, 1758) in Nagarjun forest of Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park, Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Zoology 2, 18-25.

[6] Borchard P, Eldridge DJ (2011). The geomorphic signature of bare-nosed wombats (Vombatus ursinus) and cattle (Bos taurus) in an agricultural riparian ecosystem. Geomorphology 130, 365-373.

[7] Bragg CJ, Donaldson JD, Ryan PG (2005). Density of Cape porcupines in a semi-arid environment and their impact on soil turnover and related ecosystem processes. Journal of Arid Environments 61, 261-275.

[8] Bravo LG, Belliure J, Rebollo S (2009). European rabbits as ecosystem engineers: Warrens increase lizard density and diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 18, 869-885.

[9] Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.

[10] Báldi A (2008). Habitat heterogeneity overrides the species-area relationship. Journal of Biogeography 35, 675-681.

[11] Casas-Criville A (2005). The European bee-eater (Merops apiaster) as an ecosystem engineer in arid environments. Journal of Arid Environments 60, 227-238.

[12] Challender D, Wu S, Kaspal P et al. (2019). Manis pentadactyla. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019, eT12764A123585318.

[13] Chapman TF (2013). Relic bilby (Macrotis lagotis) refuge burrows: Assessment of potential contribution to a rangeland restoration program. Rangeland Journal 35, 167-180.

[14] Coggan NV, Hayward MW, Gibb H (2018). A global database and “state of the field” review of research into ecosystem engineering by land animals. Journal of Animal Ecology 87, 974-994.

[15] Connell JH (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199, 1302-1310.

[16] Coombes MA, Viles HA (2015). Population-level zoogeomorphology: the case of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles L.). Physical Geography 36, 215-238.

[17] Cramer MJ, Willig MR (2005). Habitat heterogeneity, species diversity and null models. Oikos 108, 209-218.

[18] Davidson AD, Lightfoot DC, McIntyre JL (2008). Engineering rodents create key habitat for lizards. Journal of Arid Environments 72, 2142-2149.

[19] Davies G, Kirkpatrick J, Cameron E, Carver S Johnson C (2019). Ecosystem engineering by digging mammals: effects on soil fertility and condition in Tasmanian temperate woodland. Royal Society Open Science 6, 180621.

[20] Dawson SJ, Broussard L, Adams PJ et al. (2019). An outback oasis: The ecological importance of bilby burrows. Journal of Zoology 308, 149-163.

[21] Desbiez ALJ, Kluyber D (2013). The role of giant armadillos (Priodontes maximus) as physical ecosystem engineers. Biotropica 45, 537-540.

[22] Di Blanco YE, Desbiez ALJ, di Francescantonio D, Di Bitetti M (2020). Excavations of giant armadillos alter environmental conditions and provide new resources for a range of animals. Journal of Zoology 4, 311.

[23] DNPWC & DoF (2018). Pangolin Conservation Action Plan for Nepal (2018-2022). Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation and Department of Forests, Kathmandu, Nepal.

[24] Doonan TJ, Stout IJ (1994). Effects of gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) body size on burrow structure. American Midland Naturalist 131, 273-280.

[25] Dorji D (2017). Distribution, habitat use, threats and conservation of the critically endangered Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) in Samtse District, Bhutan. Rufford Small Grants, UK (unpublished).

[26] Eldridge DJ, Koen TB, Killgore A, Huang N, Whitford WG (2012). Animal foraging as a mechanism for sediment movement and soil nutrient development: Evidence from the semi-arid Australian woodlands and the Chihuahuan Desert. Geomorphology 157-158, 131-141.

[27] Eriksson B, Eldridge D (2014). Surface destabilisation by the invasive burrowing engineer Mus musculus on a sub-Antarctic island. Geomorphology 223, 61-66.

[28] Fan CY (2005). Burrow habitat of Formosan pangolins (Manis pentadactyla pentadactyla) at Feitsui Reservoir (M.Sc. thesis). "National" Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, China. (In Chinese.)

[29] Fleischer K, Streitberger M, Fartmann T (2013). The importance of disturbance for the conservation of a low-competitive herb in mesotrophic grasslands. Biologia 68, 398-403.

[30] Fleming PA, Anderson H, Prendergast AS, Bretz MR, Valentine LE, Hardy GES (2013). Is the loss of Australian digging mammals contributing to a deterioration in ecosystem function? Mammal Review 44, 2.

[31] Garkaklis MJ, Bradley JS, Wooller RD (2004). Digging and soil turnover by a mycophagous marsupial. Journal of Arid Environments 56, 569-578.

[32] Gharajehdaghipour T, Roth JD, Fafard PM, Markham JH (2016). Arctic foxes as ecosystem engineers: Increased soil nutrients lead to increased plant productivity on fox dens. Scientific Reports 6, 24020.

[33] Gong Zl, Tang Y (2016). Impacts of reforestation on woody species composition, species diversity and community structure in dry-hot valley of the Jinsha River, southwestern China. Journal of Mountain Science 13, 2182-2191.

[34] Gooday AJ, Bett BJ, Escobar E et al. (2010). Habitat heterogeneity and its influence on benthic biodiversity in oxygen minimum zones. Marine Ecology 31, 125-147.

[35] Halstead LM, Sutherland DR, Valentine LE, Rendall AR, Coetsee AL, Ritchie EG (2020). Digging up the dirt: Quantifying the effects on soil of a translocated ecosystem engineer. Austral Ecology 45, 97-108.

[36] Hansen MC, Wang L, Song XP et al. (2020). The fate of tropical forest fragments. Science Advance 6, eaax8574.

[37] Haussmann NS (2016). Soil movement by burrowing mammals: A review comparing excavation size and rate to body mass of excavators. Progress Physical Geography 41, 29-45.

[38] Heath ME (1992). Manis pentadactyla. Mammalian Species 414, 1-6.

[39] Hossain MZ, King MI (1997). New information criteria for model selection. In: ESAM97. Conference Proceedings Volume 2: Econometric Theory; 2-4 Jul 1997, Melbourne, Australia. University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, pp. 585-612.

[40] Hua Y, Wei SC, Bao H, Wu SB (2020). Last chance to prevent the extinction of the Chinese pangolin. Oryx 54, 760-761.

[41] Huang S, Cai FC, Xiao ML, Xie YH (2019). Analysis on the climatic characteristics of precipitation in Heping County from 1965 to 2017. Guangdong Water Resources and Hydropower 10, 31-35. (In Chinese.)

[42] James AI, Eldridge DJ, Moseby KE (2010). Foraging pits, litter and plant germination in an arid shrubland. Journal of Arid Environments 74, 516-520.

[43] Jiang ZG, Jiang J, Wang Y, Zhang E, Zhang Y, Li L (2016). Red list of China's vertebrates. Biodivers Science 24, 500-551. (In Chinese.)

[44] Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994). Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69, 373-386.

[45] Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1996). Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78, 1946-1957.

[46] Jouquet P, Dauber J, Lagerlöf J, Lavelle P (2006). Soil invertebrates as ecosystem engineers: Intended and accidental effects on soil and feedback loops. Applied Soil Ecology 32, 153-164.

[47] Karawita H, Perera P, Gunawardane P, Dayawansa N (2018). Habitat preference and den characterization of Indian Pangolin (Manis crassicaudata) in a tropical lowland forested landscape of southwest Sri Lanka. PLoS ONE 13, e0206082.

[48] Katuwal HB, Sharma HP, Parajuli K (2017). Anthropogenic impacts on the occurrence of the critically endangered Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) in Nepal. Journal of Mammalogy 98, 1667-1673.

[49] Kerley GI, Whitford WG, Kay FR (2004). Effects of pocket gophers on desert soils and vegetation. Journal of Arid Environments 58, 155-166.

[50] Kinlaw A (1999). A review of burrowing by semi-fossorial vertebrates in arid environments. Journal of Arid Environments 41, 127-145.

[51] Krause AE, Frank KA, Mason DM, Ulanowicz RE, Taylor WW (2003). Compartments revealed in food-web structure. Nature 426, 282-285.

[52] Kumar P, Thomas S, Shahi C (2017). Linking resource availability and heterogeneity to understorey species diversity through succession in boreal forest of Canada. Journal of Ecology 106, 1266-1276.

[53] Li CM, Wang WX, Fu BX, Xiong L (2020). Characteristics of seasonal variability of climate in the area of Shaoguan. Guangdong Meteorology 6, 10-14. (In Chinese.)

[54] Li ZB, Wu XL (1999). Analysis of climate change characteristics in Huizhou in 44 years. Guangdong Meteorology S1, 58-61. (In Chinese.)

[55] Lin JS (2011). Home range and burrow utilization in Formosan pangolin (Manis pentadactyla pentadactyla) at Luanshan, Taitung (M.Sc. thesis). National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan, China. (In Chinese.)

[56] Liu GS, Jiang NH, Zhang LD, Liu ZL (1996). Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis Description of Soil Profiles. Standard Press of China, Beijing.

[57] Mallen-Cooper M, Nakagawa S, Eldridge DJ (2019). Global meta-analysis of soil-disturbing vertebrates reveals strong effects on ecosystem patterns and processes. Global Ecology and Biogeography 28, 661-679.

[58] Mcdonough CM, Delaney MJ, Le PQ, Blackmore MS, Loughry WJ (2000). Burrow characteristics and habitat associations of armadillos in Brazil and the United States of America. Revista De Biologia Tropical 48, 109-120.

[59] McGowan J, Beaumont LJ, Smith RJ et al. (2020). Conservation prioritization can resolve the flagship species conundrum. Nature Communications 11, 994.

[60] National Forestry and Grassland Administration (2020). Announcement of the national forestry and grassland administration (No.12 of 2020).

[61] Reynolds TD, Wakkinen WL (1985). Characteristics of the burrows of four species of rodents in undisturbed soils in Southeastern Idaho. American Midland Naturalist 118, 245-250.

[62] Richardson PRK (1985). The social behaviour and ecology of the aardwolf, Proteles cristatus (Sparrman, 1783) in relation to its food resources (PhD thesis). University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

[63] Root-Bernstein M, Ebensperger LA (2012). Meta-analysis of the effects of small mammal disturbances on species diversity, richness and plant biomass. Austral Ecology 38, 289-299.

[64] Rosseel Y (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 48, 1-36.

[65] Sawyer C, Brinkman D, Walker V, Covington T, Stienstraw E (2012). The zoogeomorphic characteristics of burrows and burrowing by nine-banded armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus). Geomorphology 157-158, 122-130.

[66] Scheffers BR, Edwards DP, Diesmos A, Williams SE, Evans TA (2014). Microhabitats reduce animal's exposure to climate extremes. Global Change Biology 20, 495-503.

[67] Serna-Chavez HM, Fierer N, van Bodegom PM (2013). Global drivers and patterns of microbial abundance in soil. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22, 1162-1172.

[68] Sharma HP, Rimal B, Zhang M et al. (2020). Potential distribution of the critically endangered Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) in different land covers of Nepal: Implications for conservation. Sustainability 12, 1282.

[69] Shen Y, Tian DS, Hou J et al. (2021). Forest soil acidification consistently reduces litter decomposition irrespective of nutrient availability and litter type. Functional Ecology 35, 2753-2762.

[70] Shi YQ (1985). Ant eating habits of pangolins. Wild Animals 28, 11-13. (In Chinese.)

[71] Shrestha A, Bhattarai S, Shrestha B, Koju NP (2021). Factors influencing the habitat choice of pangolins (Manis spp.) in low land of Nepal. Ecology and Evolution 11, 14689-14696.

[72] Skinner JD, Smithers RHN (1990). The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion. University of Pretoria, Pretoria.

[73] Smallwood KS, Morrison ML (1999). Estimating burrow volume and excavation rate of pocket gophers (Geomyidae). Southwestern Naturalist 44, 173-183.

[74] Streitberger M, Rose S, Gabriel H, Fartmann T (2014). The role of a mound-building ecosystem engineer for a grassland butterfly. Journal of Insect Conservation 18, 745-751.

[75] Suggitt AJ, Wilson RJ, Isaac NJB et al. (2018). Extinction risk from climate change is reduced by microclimatic buffering. Nature Climate Change 8, 713-717.

[76] Sun S (2022). Study on the characteristics of Chinese pangolin burrow and the utilization of commensals for pangolin burrow thermal refuge (M.Sc. thesis). Northeast Forestry University, Haerbin, Heilongjiang. (In Chinese.)

[77] Sun S, Dou HL, Wei SC et al. (2021). A review of the engineering role of burrowing animals: Implication of Chinese pangolin as an ecosystem engineer. Journal of Zoological Research 3, 1-20.

[78] Suwal TL, Thapa A, Gurung S et al. (2020). Predicting the potential distribution and habitat variables associated with pangolins in Nepal. Global Ecology and Conservation 23, e01049.

[79] Tamang S, Sharma HP, Belant JL (2022). Foraging burrow site selection and diet of Chinese pangolins, Chandragiri Municipality, Nepal. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI 12, 2518.

[80] Tania DA, Olivier B, François M, Adeline B, Erick P, Thierry D (2020). Harvester ants as ecological engineers for Mediterranean grassland restoration: Impacts on soil and vegetation. Biological Conservation 245, 108547.

[81] Thapa P (2013). An overview of Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla): Its general biology, status, distribution and conservation threats in Nepal. Initiation 5, 164-170.

[82] Thebault E, Fontaine C (2010). Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329, 853-856.

[83] Tian L, Tao Y, Fu W, Li T, Ren F, Li MY (2022). Dynamic simulation of land use/cover change and assessment of forest ecosystem carbon storage under climate change scenarios in Guangdong Province, China. Remote Sensing 14, 2330.

[84] Valentine LE, Anderson A, Hardy GESJ, Fleming PA (2013). Foraging activity by the southern brown bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus) as a mechanism for soil turnover. Australian Journal of Zoology 60, 419-423.

[85] Van Vuren DH, Ordeñana MA (2012). Factors influencing burrow length and depth of ground-dwelling squirrels. Journal of Mammalogy 93, 1240-1246.

[86] Wang JW, Wang J, Dou HL et al. (2021). Winter burrow habitat selection of Chinese pangolin on Neilingding Island in Shenzhen city. Chinese Journal of Wildlife 42, 700-705. (In Chinese.)

[87] Warren SD, Büttner R (2008). Active military training areas as refugia for disturbance-dependent endangered insects. Journal of Insect Conservation 12, 671-676.

[88] Waseem M, Khan B, Mahmood T et al. (2020). Occupancy, habitat suitability and habitat preference of endangered indian pangolin (Manis crassicaudata) in Potohar Plateau and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Global Ecology and Conservation 23, e01135.

[89] Whitford WG, Kay FR (1999). Biopedturbation by mammals in deserts: A review. Journal of Arid Environments 41, 203-230.

[90] Wu SB, Liu NF, Ma GZ, Xu ZR, Chen H (2003). Habitat selection by Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) in winter in Dawuling Natural Reserve. Mammalia 67, 493-501.

[91] Wu SB, Ma G, Chen H, Xu ZR, Li YY, Liu NF (2004). A preliminary study on burrow ecology of Manis pentadactyla. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology 15, 401-407. (In Chinese.)

[92] Wu SB, Ma GZ, Liao QX, Lu KH (2005). Studies of Conservation Biology on Chinese Pangolin. Chinese Forest Press, Beijing. (In Chinese.)

[93] Wu SB, Ma GZ, Tang M, Chen H, Liu NF (2002). Current situation and conservation strategies of pangolin resources in China. Journal of Natural Resources 17, 0174-0180. (In Chinese.)

[94] Yang L, Huang YH, Lima L et al. (2021) Rethinking the ecosystem functions of Dicranopteris, a widespread genus of ferns. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 581513.

[95] Yin F, L LL, Meng M (2016). Pangolin trade and protection. Chinese Journal of Wildlife 2, 157-205. (In Chinese.)

[96] Zhang F, Wang W, Mahmood A, Wu S, Li J, Xu N (2021). Observations of Chinese pangolins (Manis pentadactyla) in mainland China. Global Ecology and Conservation 26, e01460.

[97] Zimmerman JW (1990). Burrow characteristics of the nine-banded armadillo, Dasypus novemcinctus. Southwestern Naturalist 35, 226-227.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Integrative Zoology published by International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.