Alien range size, habitat breadth, origin location, and domestication of alien species matter to their impact risks

Abstract

Invasive alien species are a major driver of biodiversity loss. Currently, the process of biological invasions is experiencing a constant acceleration, foreshadowing a future increase in the threat posed by invasive alien species to global biodiversity. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the impact risks of invasive alien species and related factors. Here, we constructed a dataset of negative environmental impact events to evaluate the impact risks of alien species. We collected information on 1071 established alien terrestrial vertebrates and then gathered negative environmental impacts for 108 of those species. Generalized linear mixed-effects model and phylogenetic generalized least-squares regression model were used to examine the characteristic (including life-history traits, characteristics related to distribution, and introduction event characteristics) correlates of species’ impact risks at the global scale for 108 established alien terrestrial vertebrates (mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians). Our results showed that a total of 3158 negative environmental impacts were reported for 108 harmful species across 71 countries worldwide. Factors associated with impact risks varied slightly among taxa, but alien range size, habitat breadth, origin location, and domestication were significantly correlated with impact risks. Our study aims to identify the characteristics of alien species with high-impact risks to facilitate urgent assessment of alien species and to protect the local ecological environment and biodiversity.

Keywords

alien species / characteristics / impact risks / negative environmental impact

References

[1] Abellán P, Tella JL, Carrete M, Cardador L, Anadón JD (2017). Climate matching drives spread rate but not establishment success in recent unintentional bird introductions. PNAS 114, 9385-9390.

[2] Barton KE, Fortunel C (2023). Island plant functional syndromes and competition with invasive species. Journal of Biogeography 50, 641-653.

[3] Bellard C, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2016). Alien species as a driver of recent extinctions. Biology Letters 12, 20150623.

[4] Blackburn TM, Bellard C, Ricciardi A (2019). Alien versus native species as drivers of recent extinctions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17, 203-207.

[5] Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T et al. (2014). A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biology 12, e1001850.

[6] Brown JH (1984). On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. The American Naturalist 124, 255-279.

[7] Byers JE, Smith RS, Pringle JM et al. (2015). Invasion Expansion: Time since introduction best predicts global ranges of marine invaders. Scientific Reports 5, 12436.

[8] Cabezas S, Carrete M, Tella JL, Marchant TA, Bortolotti GR (2012). Differences in acute stress responses between wild-caught and captive-bred birds: A physiological mechanism contributing to current avian invasions? Biological Invasions 15, 521-527.

[9] Cade BS (2015). Model averaging and muddled multimodel inferences. Ecology 96, 2370-2382.

[10] Cassey P (2002). Life history and ecology influences establishment success of introduced land birds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76, 465-480.

[11] CBD (2014). Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity Twelfth meeting. Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea, 6-17 Oct 2014. Available from URL: https://cbd.int/cop12/

[12] Crystal-Ornelas R, Lockwood JL (2020). The ‘known unknowns’ of invasive species impact measurement. Biological Invasions 22, 1513-1525.

[13] Cuena-Lombraña A, Fois M, Cogoni A, Bacchetta G (2021). Where we come from and where to go: Six decades of botanical studies in the Mediterranean wetlands, with Sardinia (Italy) as a case study. Wetlands 41, 69.

[14] Doherty TS, Glen AS, Nimmo DG, Ritchie EG, Dickman CR (2016). Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss. PNAS 113, 11261-11265.

[15] Dorai-Raj S (2014). Binom: binomial confidence intervals for several parameterizations. R package version 1.1-1. Available from URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=binom

[16] Dormann CF, Calabrese JM, Guillera-Arroita G et al. (2018). Model averaging in ecology: A review of Bayesian, information-theoretic, and tactical approaches for predictive inference. Ecological Monographs 88, 485-504.

[17] Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W et al. (2015). Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. PNAS 112, 7039-7043.

[18] Essl F, Lenzner B, Bacher S et al. (2020). Drivers of future alien species impacts: An expert-based assessment. Global Change Biology 26, 4880-4893.

[19] Evans T, Blackburn TM (2019). Global variation in the availability of data on the environmental impacts of alien birds. Biological Invasions 22, 1027-1036.

[20] Fois M, Cuena-Lombraña A, Zucca C, Nissardi S, Bacchetta G (2022). Investigating plant-bird co-occurrence patterns in Mediterranean Wetlands: Can they reveal signals of ecosystem connectivity? Diversity 14, 253.

[21] Fois M, Podda L, Médail F, Bacchetta G (2020). Endemic and alien vascular plant diversity in the small Mediterranean islands of Sardinia: Drivers and implications for their conservation. Biological Conservation 244, 108519.

[22] Gippet JMW, Bertelsmeier C (2021). Invasiveness is linked to greater commercial success in the global pet trade. PNAS 118, e2016337118.

[23] Hawkins CL, Bacher S, Essl F et al. (2015). Framework and guidelines for implementing the proposed IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT). Diversity and Distributions 21, 1360-1363.

[24] Hernández-Brito D, Carrete M, Blanco G et al. (2021). The role of monk parakeets as nest-site facilitators in their native and invaded areas. Biology 10, 683.

[25] Hulme PE (2020). Plant invasions in New Zealand: Global lessons in prevention, eradication and control. Biological invasions 22, 1539-1562.

[26] Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M et al. (2008). Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: A framework for integrating pathways into policy. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 403-414.

[27] Hulme PE, Firn J (2015). Invasion pathways at a crossroad: Policy and research challenges for managing alien species introductions. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 1418-1424.

[28] Jeschke JM, Strayer DL (2006). Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America. Global Change Biology 12, 1608-1619.

[29] Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO (2012). The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444-448.

[30] Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002). Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298, 1233-1236.

[31] Kumschick S, Bacher S, Blackburn TM (2013). What determines the impact of alien birds and mammals in Europe? Biological Invasions 15, 785-797.

[32] Li Y, Blackburn TM, Luo Z et al. (2023). Quantifying global colonization pressures of alien vertebrates from wildlife trade. Nature Communications 14, 7914.

[33] Li Y, Yu FH (2023). Managing the risk of biological invasions. Iscience 26, 108221.

[34] Liu X, Li XP, Liu ZT et al. (2014). Congener diversity, topographic heterogeneity and humanassisted dispersal predict spread rates of alien herpetofauna at a global scale. Ecology Letters 17, 821-829.

[35] Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2013). Invasion Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

[36] Lockwood JL, Welbourne DJ, Romagosa CM et al. (2019). When pets become pests: The role of the exotic pet trade in producing invasive vertebrate animals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17, 323-330.

[37] Lomolino MV (2005). Body size evolution in insular vertebrates: generality of the island rule. Journal of Biogeography 32, 1683-1699.

[38] Losos JB, Ricklefs RE (2009). Adaptation and diversification on islands. Nature 457, 830-836.

[39] Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M (2000). 100 of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species a selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. Invasive Species Specialist Group, Auckland, New Zealand.

[40] Mason GJ (2010). Species differences in responses to captivity: Stress, welfare and the comparative method. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25, 713-721.

[41] Measey GJ, Vimercati G, de Villiers FA et al. (2016). A global assessment of alien amphibian impacts in a formal framework. Diversity and Distributions 22, 970-981.

[42] Novoa A, Richardson DM, Pyšek P et al. (2020). Invasion syndromes: A systematic approach for predicting biological invasions and facilitating effective management. Biological Invasions 22, 1801-1820.

[43] Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED et al. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the World: A new map of life on earth. BioScience 51, 933-938.

[44] O'Neil CM, Guo Y, Pierre S, Boughton EH, Qiu J (2023). Invasive snails alter multiple ecosystem functions in subtropical wetlands. Science of The Total Environment 864, 160939.

[45] Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM et al. (1999). Impact: Toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological Invasions 1, 3-19.

[46] Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Simberloff D et al. (2020). Scientists' warning on invasive alien species. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 95, 1511-1534.

[47] Pyšek P, Krivanek M, Jarosik V (2009). Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90, 2734-2744.

[48] Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2010). Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35, 25-55.

[49] R Core Team (2022). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from URL: http://www.r-project.org/

[50] Reino L, Figueira R, Beja P, Araújo MB, Capinha C, Strub D (2017). Networks of global bird invasion altered by regional trade ban. Science Advances 3, e1700783.

[51] Ricciardi A (2003). Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions. Freshwater Biology 48, 972-981.

[52] Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1998). Predicting the identity and impact of future biological invaders: A priority for aquatic resource management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55, 1759-1765.

[53] Santini L, Benítez-López A, Ficetola GF, Huijbregts MAJ (2018). Length-mass allometries in amphibians. Integrative Zoology 13, 36-45.

[54] Schröder A, Nilsson KA, Persson L, van Kooten T, Reichstein B (2009). Invasion success depends on invader body size in a size-structured mixed predation-competition community. Journal of Animal Ecology 78, 1152-1162.

[55] Seebens H, Bacher S, Blackburn TM et al. (2020). Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Global Change Biology 27, 970-982.

[56] Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE et al. (2017). No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nature Communications 8, 14435.

[57] Slatyer RA, Hirst M, Sexton JP (2013). Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: A general ecological pattern. Ecology Letters 16, 1104-1114.

[58] Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML (2006). Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 645-651.

[59] Trueman M, Atkinson R, Guézou A, Wurm P (2010). Residence time and human-mediated propagule pressure at work in the alien flora of Galapagos. Biological Invasions 12, 3949-3960.

[60] Upham NS, Esselstyn JA, Jetz W (2019). Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. PLoS Biology 17, e3000494.

[61] Varray S (2010). Espèces exotiques envahissantes animales sur le Bassin de la Loire: Quelles sont les espèces présentes? Etablissement d'une liste et hiérarchisation des vertébrés (hors poissons) pour orienter les priorités de gestion. ONCFS, Délégation Interrégionale Centre, Ile de France.

[62] Vazquez DP (2006). Exploring the relationship between nichie breadth and invasion success. In: Cadotte MW, McMahon SM, Fukami T, eds. Conceptual Ecology and Invasion Biology: Reciprocal Approaches to Nature, vol. 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 307-322.

[63] Volery L, Jatavallabhula D, Scillitani L, Bertolino S, Bacher S (2021). Ranking alien species based on their risks of causing environmental impacts: A global assessment of alien ungulates. Global Change Biology 27, 1003-1016.

[64] Zeng Y, Ping X, Wei F (2020). A conceptual framework and definitions for the term “wild animal”. Biodiversity Science 28, 541.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Integrative Zoology published by International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.