Synergistic adsorption and catalytic effects of Ti3C2Tx/CoO/MoO3 composite on lithium polysulfides for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries

Bin Fan , Weikun Chen , Kaining Li , Qingya Wei , Qian He , Wei Liu , Bigui Zhou , Jun Yuan , Yingping Zou

Interdisciplinary Materials ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (5) : 726 -737.

PDF (3519KB)
Interdisciplinary Materials ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (5) : 726 -737. DOI: 10.1002/idm2.12178
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Synergistic adsorption and catalytic effects of Ti3C2Tx/CoO/MoO3 composite on lithium polysulfides for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries

Author information +
History +
PDF (3519KB)

Abstract

The shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and their sluggish kinetic processes lead to rapid capacity fading and poor cycling stability in lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries, limiting their commercial viability. This study proposes a functionalized separator with adsorption and synergistic catalysis ability for Li–S batteries. The modified separator comprises Ti3C2Tx sheets, CoO, and MoO3. Experimental and theoretical calculations demonstrate that Ti3C2Tx/CoO/MoO3 composite not only effectively inhibits the shuttle effect of LiPSs, ensuring efficient utilization of active materials, but also enhances reversibility and reaction kinetics among LiPSs. The full exposure of active sites in the Ti3C2Tx/CoO/MoO3 composite and the synergistic action of different catalysts enable efficient capture and conversion of LiPSs molecules at the material surface. Besides, the lithium–sulfur batteries with Ti3C2Tx/CoO/MoO3@PP separator exhibited only a 0.042% capacity decay per cycle at 0.5 C (800 cycles). Moreover, a high areal capacity of 6.85mAh cm-2 was achieved at high sulfur loading (7.9mg cm-2) and low electrolyte-to-sulfur ratio (10 µLmg-1).

Keywords

lithium–sulfur batteries / polysulfides / reaction kinetics / separator / synergistic catalysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Bin Fan, Weikun Chen, Kaining Li, Qingya Wei, Qian He, Wei Liu, Bigui Zhou, Jun Yuan, Yingping Zou. Synergistic adsorption and catalytic effects of Ti3C2Tx/CoO/MoO3 composite on lithium polysulfides for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Interdisciplinary Materials, 2024, 3(5): 726-737 DOI:10.1002/idm2.12178

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Luo J, Guan K, Lei W, Zhang S, Jia Q, Zhang H. One dimensional carbon-based composites as cathodes for lithium-sulfur battery. J Mater Sci Technol. 2022;122:101–120.

[2]

Hu Y, Chen W, Lei T, et al. Strategies toward high-loading lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Energy Mater. 2020;10:2000082.

[3]

Zhang Q, Ma Q, Wang R, et al. Recent progress in advanced organosulfur cathode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Mater Today. 2023;65:100–121.

[4]

Tan K, Tan Z, Liu S, et al. Synergistic design of core-shell V3S4@C hosts and homogeneous catalysts promoting polysulfide chemisorption and conversion for Li-S batteries. J Mater Chem A. 2023;11:2233–2245.

[5]

Liu Y-H, Qu J, Chang W, et al. A photo-assisted reversible lithium-sulfur battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2022;50:334–343.

[6]

Pan H, Cheng Z, Zhou Z, et al. Boosting lean electrolyte lithium-sulfur battery performance with transition metals: a comprehensive review. Nano Micro Lett. 2023;15:165.

[7]

Han Z, Ren H-R, Huang Z, et al. A permselective coating protects lithium anode toward a practical lithium-sulfur battery. ACS Nano. 2023;17:4453–4462.

[8]

Yang K, Li C, Qi H, Dai Y, Cui Y, He Y. Developing a MXene quantum dot-based separator for Li-S batteries. J Mater Chem A. 2023;11:10425–10434.

[9]

Ni L, Gu J, Jiang X, et al. Polyoxometalate-cyclodextrin-based cluster-organic supramolecular framework for polysulfide conversion and guest-host recognition in lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2023;62:e202306528.

[10]

Hao H, Hutter T, Boyce BL, Watt J, Liu P, Mitlin D. Review of multifunctional separators: stabilizing the cathode and the anode for alkali (Li, Na, and K) metal-sulfur and selenium batteries. Chem Rev. 2022;122:8053–8125.

[11]

Li S, Zhang W, Zheng J, Lv M, Song H, Du L. Inhibition of polysulfide shuttles in Li-S batteries: modified separators and solid-state electrolytes. Adv Energy Mater. 2021;11:2000779.

[12]

Ren L, Sun K, Wang Y, et al. Tandem catalysis inside double-shelled nanocages with separated and tunable atomic catalyst sites for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater. 2024:2310547.

[13]

Haase FT, Bergmann A, Jones TE, et al. Size effects and active state formation of cobalt oxide nanoparticles during the oxygen evolution reaction. Nat Energy. 2022;7:765–773.

[14]

Zohar A, Wyckoff KE, Vincent RC, Mates TE, Seshadri R. Controlling operating voltages in molybdenum oxide anodes through inductive effects. Chem Mater. 2023;35:5009–5016.

[15]

Wu Y, Liu W, Zhang Z, et al. Defect-rich MoO3 nanobelts for ultrafast and wide-temperature proton battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2023;61:102849.

[16]

Feng S, Gu C, Yu Y, et al. A two-dimensional heterogeneous structured Ni3Se2@MoO3 catalyst for seawater electrolysis. J Mater Chem A. 2023;11:11740–11747.

[17]

Sun S, Han Z, Liu W, et al. Lattice pinning in MoO3 via coherent interface with stabilized Li+ intercalation. Nat Commun. 2023;14:6662.

[18]

Kundu M, Mondal D, Mondal I, et al. A rational preparation strategy of phase tuned MoO3 nanostructures for high-performance all-solid asymmetric supercapacitor. J Energy Chem. 2023;87:192–206.

[19]

Han M, Yin X, Wu H, et al. Ti3C2 MXenes with modified surface for high-performance electromagnetic absorption and shielding in the X-band. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:21011–21019.

[20]

Berger E, Lv Z-P, Komsa H-P. Raman spectra of 2D titanium carbide MXene from machine-learning force field molecular dynamics. J Mater Chem C. 2023;11:1311–1319.

[21]

de Castro Silva I, Reinaldo AC, Sigoli FA, Mazali IO. Raman spectroscopy-in situ characterization of reversibly intercalated oxygen vacancies in α-MoO3. RSC Adv. 2020;10:18512–18518.

[22]

Bae SJ, Kang Uk, Dymshits O, Shashkin A, Tsenter M, Zhilin A. Raman spectroscopy study of phase transformations in titania-containing lithium aluminosilicate glasses doped with CoO. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2005;351:2969–2978.

[23]

Hu Y, Hu C, Du A, et al. Interfacial evolution on Co-based oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts probed by using in situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2023;95:1703–1709.

[24]

Li H, Wang Y, Chen H, Niu B, Zhang W, Wu D. Synergistic mediation of polysulfide immobilization and conversion by a catalytic and dual-adsorptive system for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Eng J. 2021;406:126802.

[25]

Gong Y, Zhao Y, Zhou Z, et al. Polarized Raman scattering of in-plane anisotropic phonon modes in α-MoO3. Adv Opt Mater. 2022;10:2200038.

[26]

Zou B, Wang X, Zhou Y, et al. Optical effect modulation in polarized Raman spectroscopy of transparent layered α-MoO3. Small. 2023;19:2206932.

[27]

Ghazi ZA, He X, Khattak AM, et al. MoS2/Celgard separator as efficient polysulfide barrier for long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1606817.

[28]

Wang D, Yan B, Guo Y, Chen L, Yu F, Wang G. N-doped carbon coated CoO nanowire arrays derived from zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 as binder-free anodes for high-performance lithium storage. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5934.

[29]

Wang M, Peng A, Jiang J, et al. Heterointerface synergistic Na+ storage fundamental mechanism for CoSeO3 playing as anode for sodium ion batteries/capacitors. Chem Eng J. 2022;433:134567.

[30]

Al-Ansi N, Salah A, Gu Z-Y, et al. TiO2-coated MoO3 nanorods for lithium/sodium-ion storage. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2023;6:19876–19886.

[31]

Xie J, Li B-Q, Peng H-J, et al. Implanting atomic cobalt within mesoporous carbon toward highly stable lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1903813.

[32]

Al-Tahan MA, Dong Y, Zhang R, Zhang Y, Zhang J. Understanding the high-performance Fe(OH)3@GO nanoarchitecture as effective sulfur hosts for the high capacity of lithium-sulfur batteries. Appl Surf Sci. 2021;538:148032.

[33]

Ma Z, Liu Y, Gautam J, et al. Embedding cobalt atom clusters in CNT-wired MoS2 tube-in-tube nanostructures with enhanced sulfur immobilization and catalyzation for Li-S batteries. Small. 2021;17:2102710.

[34]

Fan B, He Q, Wei Q, Liu W, Zhou B, Zou Y. Anchoring and catalyzing polysulfides by rGO/MoS2/C modified separator in lithium-sulfur batteries. Carbon. 2023;214:118361.

[35]

Shi M, Liu Z, Zhang S, et al. A Mott-Schottky heterogeneous layer for Li-S batteries: enabling both high stability and commercial-sulfur utilization. Adv Energy Mater. 2022;12:2103657.

[36]

Lei D, Shang W, Zhang X, et al. Facile synthesis of heterostructured MoS2-MoO3 nanosheets with active electrocatalytic sites for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Nano. 2021;15:20478–20488.

[37]

Wang R, Wu R, Yan X, et al. Implanting single Zn atoms coupled with metallic Co nanoparticles into porous carbon nanosheets grafted with carbon nanotubes for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32:2200424.

[38]

Du Z, Chen X, Hu W, et al. Cobalt in nitrogen-doped graphene as single-atom catalyst for high-sulfur content lithium-sulfur batteries. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141:3977–3985.

[39]

Fan H, Gao X-W, Xu H, Ding Y, Dou SX, Luo WB. Catalytic effect in lithium metal batteries: from heterogeneous catalyst to homogenous catalyst. J Energy Chem. 2024;90:305–326.

[40]

Zhang B-W, Cao L, Tang C, et al. Atomically dispersed dual-site cathode with a record high sulfur mass loading for high-performance room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater. 2023;35:2206828.

[41]

Zhou S, Shi J, Liu S, et al. Visualizing interfacial collective reaction behaviour of Li-S batteries. Nature. 2023;621:75–81.

[42]

Scharifker B, Hills G. Theoretical and experimental studies of multiple nucleation. Electrochim Acta. 1983;28:879–889.

[43]

Yan C, Jiang L-L, Yao Y-X, Lu Y, Huang JQ, Zhang Q. Nucleation and growth mechanism of anion-derived solid electrolyte interphase in rechargeable batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;60:8521–8525.

[44]

Chen Z-X, Cheng Q, Li X-Y, et al. Cathode kinetics evaluation in lean-electrolyte lithium-sulfur batteries. J Am Chem Soc. 2023;145:16449–16457.

[45]

Fan B, Zhao D, Xu W, et al. Nitrogen-doped carbonaceous scaffold anchored with cobalt nanoparticles as sulfur host for efficient adsorption and catalytic conversion of polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta. 2021;383:138371.

[46]

Chen L, Sun Y, Wei X, et al. Dual-functional V2C MXene assembly in facilitating sulfur evolution kinetics and Li-ion sieving toward practical lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater. 2023;35:2300771.

[47]

Peng L, Wei Z, Wan C, et al. A fundamental look at electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction. Nat Catal. 2020;3:762–770.

[48]

Wang X, Zhao C, Liu B, et al. Creating edge sites within the 2D metal-organic framework boosts redox kinetics in lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2022;12:2201960.

[49]

Kang X, Jin Z, Peng H, et al. The role of selenium vacancies functionalized mediator of bimetal (Co, Fe) selenide for high-energy-density lithium-sulfur batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;637:161–172.

[50]

Huang T, Cao Q, Jing B, Wang X, Wang D, Liang L. Towards high-performance lithium-sulfur battery: investigation on the capability of metalloid to regulate polysulfides. Chem Eng J. 2022;430:132677.

[51]

Cheng Q, Chen Z-X, Li X-Y, et al. Deciphering the degradation mechanism of high-rate and high-energy-density lithium-sulfur pouch cells. Adv Energy Mater. 2023;13:2301770.

[52]

Yang BZ, Xie P, Luo Q, et al. Binder-free ω-Li3V2O5 catalytic network with multi-polarization centers assists lithium-sulfur batteries for enhanced kinetics behavior. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32:2110665.

[53]

Gao H, Ning S, Lin J, Kang X. Molecular perturbation of 2D organic modifiers on porous carbon interlayer: promoted redox kinetics of polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2021;40:312–319.

[54]

Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;77:3865–3868.

[55]

Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys. 2010;132:154104.

[56]

Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter Mater Phys. 1976;13:5188–5192.

[57]

Henkelman G, Uberuaga BP, Jónsson H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J Chem Phys. 2000;113:9901–9904.

[58]

Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter Mater Phys. 1996;54:11169–11186.

[59]

Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci. 1996;6:15–50.https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Interdisciplinary Materials published by Wuhan University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (3519KB)

218

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/