iNAP 2.0: Harnessing metabolic complementarity in microbial network analysis

Abstract

With the widespread adoption of metagenomic sequencing, new perspectives have emerged for studying microbial ecological networks, yielding metabolic evidence of interspecies interactions that traditional co-occurrence networks cannot infer. This protocol introduces the integrated Network Analysis Pipeline 2.0 (iNAP 2.0), which features an innovative metabolic complementarity network for microbial studies from metagenomics sequencing data. iNAP 2.0 sets up a four-module process for metabolic interaction analysis, namely: (I) Prepare genome-scale metabolic models; (II) Infer pairwise interactions of genome-scale metabolic models; (III) Construct metabolic interaction networks; and (IV) Analyze metabolic interaction networks. Starting from metagenome-assembled or complete genomes, iNAP 2.0 offers a variety of methods to quantify the potential and trends of metabolic complementarity between models, including the PhyloMint pipeline based on phylogenetic distance-adjusted metabolic complementarity, the SMETANA (species metabolic interaction analysis) approach based on cross-feeding substrate exchange prediction, and metabolic distance calculation based on parsimonious flux balance analysis (pFBA). Notably, iNAP 2.0 integrates the random matrix theory (RMT) approach to find the suitable threshold for metabolic interaction network construction. Finally, the metabolic interaction networks can proceed to analysis using topological feature analysis such as hub node determination. In addition, a key feature of iNAP 2.0 is the identification of potentially transferable metabolites between species, presented as intermediate nodes that connect microbial nodes in the metabolic complementarity network. To illustrate these new features, we use a set of metagenome-assembled genomes as an example to comprehensively document the usage of the tools. iNAP 2.0 is available at https://inap.denglab.org.cn for all users to register and use for free.

Keywords

metabolic complementarity / metagenome-assembled genomes / metabolic network

References

[1] Lemke, Michael, and Rob DeSalle. 2023. “The Next Generation of Microbial Ecology and Its Importance in Environmental Sustainability.” Microbial Ecology 85: 781-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-023-02185-y

[2] Mendes-Soares, Helena, Michael Mundy, Luis Mendes Soares, and Nicholas Chia. 2016. “MMinte: An Application for Predicting Metabolic Interactions Among the Microbial Species in a Community.” BMC Bioinformatics 17: 343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1230-3

[3] Faust, Karoline. 2021. “Open Challenges for Microbial Network Construction and Analysis.” The ISME Journal 15: 3111-3118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01027-4

[4] Esvap, Elif, and Kutlu O. Ulgen. 2021. “Advances in Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling Toward Microbial Community Analysis of the Human Microbiome.” ACS Synthetic Biology 10: 2121-2137. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00140

[5] Zelezniak, Aleksej, Sergej Andrejev, Olga Ponomarova, Daniel R. Mende, Peer Bork, and Kiran Raosaheb Patil. 2015. “Metabolic Dependencies Drive Species Co-Occurrence in Diverse Microbial Communities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 6449-6454. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421834112

[6] Feng, Kai, Xi Peng, Zheng Zhang, Songsong Gu, Qing He, Wenli Shen, Zhujun Wang, et al. 2022. “iNAP: An Integrated Network Analysis Pipeline for Microbiome Studies.” iMeta 1: e13. https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.13

[7] Machado, Daniel, Sergej Andrejev, Melanie Tramontano, and Kiran Raosaheb Patil. 2018. “Fast Automated Reconstruction of Genome-Scale Metabolic Models for Microbial Species and Communities.” Nucleic Acids Research 46: 7542-7553. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky537

[8] Lam, Tony J., Moses Stamboulian, Wontack Han, and Yuzhen Ye. 2020. “Model-Based and Phylogenetically Adjusted Quantification of Metabolic Interaction Between Microbial Species.” PLOS Computational Biology 16: e1007951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007951

[9] Ebrahim, Ali, Joshua A. Lerman, Bernhard O. Palsson, and Daniel R. Hyduke. 2013. “COBRApy: COnstraints-Based Reconstruction and Analysis for Python.” BMC Systems Biology 7: 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-7-74

[10] King, Zachary A., Justin Lu, Andreas Dräger, Philip Miller, Stephen Federowicz, Joshua A. Lerman, Ali Ebrahim, Bernhard O. Palsson, and Nathan E. Lewis. 2015. “BiGG Models: A Platform for Integrating, Standardizing and Sharing Genome-Scale Models.” Nucleic Acids Research 44: D515-D522. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1049

[11] Seemann, Torsten. 2014. “Prokka: Rapid Prokaryotic Genome Annotation.” Bioinformatics 30: 2068-2069. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153

[12] Henry, Christopher S., Matthew DeJongh, Aaron A. Best, Paul M. Frybarger, Ben Linsay, and Rick L. Stevens. 2010. “High-Throughput Generation, Optimization and Analysis of Genome-Scale Metabolic Models.” Nature Biotechnology 28: 977-982. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1672

[13] Noronha, Alberto, Jennifer Modamio, Yohan Jarosz, Elisabeth Guerard, Nicolas Sompairac, German Preciat, Anna Dröfn Daníelsdóttir, et al. 2018. “The Virtual Metabolic Human Database: Integrating Human and Gut Microbiome Metabolism With Nutrition and Disease.” Nucleic Acids Research 47: D614-D624. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky992

[14] Community, The, and Galaxy. 2024. “The Galaxy Platform for Accessible, Reproducible, and Collaborative Data Analyses: 2024 Update.” Nucleic Acids Research 52: W83-W94. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae410

[15] Colosimo, Dominic A., Jeffery A. Kohn, Peter M. Luo, Frank J. Piscotta, Sun M. Han, Amanda J. Pickard, Arka Rao, et al. 2019. “Mapping Interactions of Microbial Metabolites with Human G-Protein-Coupled Receptors.” Cell Host Microbe 26: 273-282.e277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.002

[16] Peng, Xi, Shang Wang, Miaoxiao Wang, Kai Feng, Qing He, Xingsheng Yang, Weiguo Hou, et al. 2024. “Metabolic interdependencies in thermophilic communities are revealed using co-occurrence and complementarity networks.” Nature Communications 15: 8166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52532-x

[17] Hyatt, Doug, Gwo-Liang Chen, Philip F. LoCascio, Miriam L. Land, Frank W. Larimer, and Loren J. Hauser. 2010. “Prodigal: Prokaryotic Gene Recognition and Translation Initiation Site Identification.” BMC Bioinformatics 11: 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-119

[18] Cantalapiedra, Carlos P., Ana Hernández-Plaza, Ivica Letunic, Peer Bork, and Jaime Huerta-Cepas. 2021. “eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional Annotation, Orthology Assignments, and Domain Prediction at the Metagenomic Scale.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 38: 5825-5829. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab293

[19] Huerta-Cepas, Jaime, Damian Szklarczyk, Davide Heller, Ana Hernández-Plaza, Sofia K. Forslund, Helen Cook, Daniel R. Mende, et al. 2018. “eggNOG 5.0: a Hierarchical, Functionally and Phylogenetically Annotated Orthology Resource Based on 5090 Organisms and 2502 Viruses.” Nucleic Acids Research 47: D309-D314. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1085

[20] Chen, Can, Yang-Yu Chen Liao, and Liu. 2023. “Teasing out Missing Reactions in Genome-Scale Metabolic Networks through Hypergraph Learning.” Nature Communications 14: 2375. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38110-7

[21] Giordano, Nils, Marinna Gaudin, Camille Trottier, Erwan Delage, Charlotte Nef, Chris Bowler, and Samuel Chaffron. 2024. “Genome-Scale Community Modelling Reveals Conserved Metabolic Cross-Feedings in Epipelagic Bacterioplankton Communities.” Nature Communications 15: 2721. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46374-w

[22] Hsieh, Yunli Eric, Kshitij Tandon, Heroen Verbruggen, and Zoran Nikoloski. 2024. “Comparative Analysis of Metabolic Models of Microbial Communities Reconstructed from Automated Tools and Consensus Approaches.” npj Systems Biology and Applications 10: 54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-024-00384-y

[23] Mendoza, Sebastián N., Brett G. Olivier, Douwe Molenaar, and Bas Teusink. 2019. “A Systematic Assessment of Current Genome-Scale Metabolic Reconstruction Tools.” Genome Biology 20: 158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1769-1

[24] Machado, Daniel, Oleksandr M. Maistrenko, Sergej Andrejev, Yongkyu Kim, Peer Bork, Kaustubh R. Patil, and Kiran R. Patil. 2021. “Polarization of Microbial Communities between Competitive and Cooperative Metabolism.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 5: 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01353-4

[25] Giri, Samir, Leonardo Oña, Silvio Waschina, Shraddha Shitut, Ghada Yousif, Christoph Kaleta, and Christian Kost. 2021. “Metabolic Dissimilarity Determines the Establishment of Cross-Feeding Interactions in Bacteria.” Current Biology 31: 5547-5557.e5546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.019

[26] Magnúsdóttir, Stefanía, Almut Heinken, Laura Kutt, Dmitry A. Ravcheev, Eugen Bauer, Alberto Noronha, Kacy Greenhalgh, et al. 2017. “Generation of Genome-Scale Metabolic Reconstructions for 773 Members of the Human Gut Microbiota.” Nature Biotechnology 35: 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3703

[27] Greenacre, Michael, and Raul Primicerio. 2014. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Spain: Fundación BBVA, https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=0H6IAgAAQBAJ

[28] Iglewicz, Boris, and David Caster Hoaglin. 1993. How to Detect and Handle Outliers. United States: ASQC Quality Press. https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=siInAQAAIAAJ

[29] Tukey, John Wilder. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. United States: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=UT9dAAAAIAAJ

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). iMeta published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of iMeta Science.