Demographic changes, technology growth, and retirement policy reform: Implications for U.S. housing dynamics

Abstract

As the population aging process continues, concerns about how this situation impacts the housing market and social security rise. To address this question, this paper presents a developed and calibrated general equilibrium life-cycle model incorporating two production sectors to analyze the impacts of demographic structure changes and retirement policy reforms on housing price fluctuations and household choices. The model calibrated to the U.S. macroeconomic data between 1968 and 2018 suggests that in an economy with unlimited land supply, the housing supply curve exhibits perfect elasticity, rendering demographic changes insignificant in housing price fluctuations, while technological advancements lead to decreased prices. A 1% growth in productivity in both sectors results in a 2.6% decrease in house prices. Furthermore, a 1% decrease in population and a 5-year early retirement led to significant reductions of 25% and 30% in individual social security payments and 9% and 18% in interest rates, respectively. This suggests that during a recession caused by demographic structural changes, households become more conservative and prioritize precautionary saving strategies, increasing savings and investing more in housing assets. Consistent with empirical findings, during an economic boom, a decline in the capital-output ratio and the real housing price suggests a decrease in savings and housing asset investment. The rise in consumption drives the capital demand of the non-housing sector to increase, stimulating business expansion and labor inflow.

Keywords

Demographic structure / Lifecycle model / Retirement policy / Housing market

Funding

This work was supported by the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX24_3354).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

[1] Aoki K., Proudman J., & Vlieghe G. (2004). House prices, consumption, and monetary policy: A financial accelerator approach. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13(4):414-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2004.06.003

[2] Causa O., Woloszko N., & Leite D. (2019). Housing, wealth accumulation and wealth distribution:Evidence and Stylized Facts. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/18151973

[3] Campbell J.R., & Hercowitz Z. (2006). The macroeconomic transition to high household debt. In: Financial Innovations and the Real Economy’Conference Sponsored by the Center for the Study of Innovation and Productivity. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. p. 16-17.

[4] Chen H.J., & Miyazaki K. (2022). Pay-as-you-go social security and educational subsidy in an overlapping generations model with endogenous fertility and endogenous retirement. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2):787-820. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2021-0046

[5] Chen K. (2010). A life-cycle analysis of social security with housing. Review of Economic Dynamics, 13(3):597-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2009.10.001

[6] Cipriani G., & Fioroni T. (2022). Social security and endogenous demographic change: Child support and retirement policies. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 21(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747220000402

[7] Cipriani G.P., & Pascucci F. (2020). Pension policies in a model with endogenous fertility. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 19(1):109-125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747218000148

[8] Davis M.A., & Heathcote J. (2007). The price and quantity of residential land in the United States. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(8):2595-2620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.06.023

[9] D’Lima, W., Lopez, L.A., & Pradhan, A. (2022). COVID. COVID COVIDco.2007.06.023.2007.06.023” ates. ited States. State Real Estate Economics, 50(2):303-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12368

[10] Favilukis J., Ludvigson S.C., & Van Nieuwerburgh S. (2017). The macroeconomic effects of housing wealth, housing finance, and limited risk sharing in general equilibrium. Journal of Political Economy, 125(1):140-223. https://doi.org/10.1086/689606

[11] Floetotto M., Kirker M., & Stroebel J. (2016). Government intervention in the housing market: Who wins, who loses? Journal of Monetary Economics, 80:106-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.04.005

[12] Glover A., Heathcote J., Krueger D., & Ríos-Rull J.V. (2020). Intergenerational redistribution in the great recession. Journal of Political Economy, 128(10):3730-3778. https://doi.org/10.1086/708820

[13] Kaplan G., Mitman K., & Violante G.L. (2020). The housing boom and bust: Model meets evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 128(9):3285-3345. https://doi.org/10.1086/708816

[14] Liu L. (2023). Mortgage loan and housing market. International Review of Economics and Finance, 83:736-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.10.012

[15] Mast, Evan, The Effect of New Market-Rate Housing Construction on the Low-Income Housing Market. (2019). Upjohn Institute WP 19- 307, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3426103

[16] Munnell A.H. (1976). Private pensions and savings: New evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 84(5):1013-1032. https://doi.org/10.1086/260494

[17] Ng E.C. (2015). Housing market dynamics in China: Findings from an estimated DSGE model. Journal of Housing Economics, 29:26-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2015.05.003

[18] Wang K., & Yao H. (2024). How environmental information is capitalized into the housing market? Evidence from China’s national ambient air quality standards. China Economic Review, 2024:102264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102264

[19] Xu S. (2013). An Equilibrium Analysis of the Rise in House Prices and Mortgage debt (No. 2013-9). Bank of Canada Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.34989/swp-2013-9

[20] Zhao B. (2018). Too poor to retire? Housing prices and retirement. Review of Economic Dynamics, 27:27-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2017.11.002