Rheological behavior and injectability of PEG/glycerol/bioactive glass-based bone grafts incorporating Denosumab

Cem Özel , Ali Can Özarslan , Sevil Yücel

International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12) : 3086 -3104.

PDF
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12) :3086 -3104. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-025-3263-y
Research Article
research-article
Rheological behavior and injectability of PEG/glycerol/bioactive glass-based bone grafts incorporating Denosumab
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In this study, injectable bone graft putty samples were developed using fine and coarse melt-quenched 45S5 bioactive glass (BG) incorporated into a carrier system composed of glycerol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) with different average molecular weights. Selected putty samples were further incorporated with varying amounts of Denosumab (5wt%–10wt%) to investigate its influence on rheological behavior and flow properties using mathematical modeling. All PEG/glycerol/45S5-based putty samples exhibited viscoelastic behavior (storage modulus > loss modulus) and pseudoplastic behavior (n < 1), with viscosity values required for optimal flow remaining below 1000 Pa·s. Both viscosity and thixotropic area increased proportionally with higher BG content and smaller-sized BG particles. All putty samples showed more than 98% injectability through a 12G cannula, suggesting potential clinical suitability. However, injectability decreased with smaller cannulas, dropping to 34.7%–58.3% with a 19G cannula and further decreasing with a 23G cannula at higher BG contents. Incorporation of Denosumab preserved viscoelasticity and injectability but modified the flow behavior, shifting it from pseudoplastic to more Newtonian with higher Denosumab content, while also reducing viscosity and thixotropic area values. Among all tested samples, putty containing a lower amount of Denosumab and smaller-sized BG exhibited the most suitable combination of injectability and rheological features. All putty samples were well described by both the Power law and Herschel–Bulkley rheological models (coefficient of determination > 0.95). This study highlights the influence of Denosumab on flowability and rheological relationships and suggests potential improvements in bioactivity through a dual synergistic effect of BG and Denosumab in minimally invasive bone graft systems.

Keywords

bioactive glass / biomaterial / Denosumab / injectable bone graft / injectability / putty / synergetic effect / rheology

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Cem Özel, Ali Can Özarslan, Sevil Yücel. Rheological behavior and injectability of PEG/glycerol/bioactive glass-based bone grafts incorporating Denosumab. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2025, 32(12): 3086-3104 DOI:10.1007/s12613-025-3263-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Allmendinger A, Fischer S, Huwyler J, et al. . Rheological characterization and injection forces of concentrated protein formulations: An alternative predictive model for non-Newtonian solutions. Eur. J. Pharm.. 2014, 87(2): 318

[2]

Qian Y, De Schutter G. Enhancing thixotropy of fresh cement pastes with nanoclay in presence of polycarboxylate ether superplasticizer (PCE). Cem. Concr. Res.. 2018, 111: 15

[3]

Bohner M, Baroud G. Injectability of calcium phosphate pastes. Biomaterials. 2005, 26(13): 1553

[4]

Baroud G, Cayer E, Bohner M. Rheological characterization of concentrated aqueous β-tricalcium phosphate suspensions: The effect of liquid-to-powder ratio, milling time, and additives. Acta Biomater.. 2005, 1(3): 357

[5]

Wu ZF, Lin ZY, Yao AH, et al. . Influence of particle size distribution on the rheological properties and mathematical model fitting of injectable borosilicate bioactive glass bone cement. Ceram. Int.. 2020, 46(15): 24395

[6]

Ozdil D, Günal G, Tevlek A, Aydin HM. Effects of liquid-to-solid ratio and gamma irradiation on the rheology and cytocompatibility of a beta-tricalcium phosphate-based injectable bone substitute. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.. 2024, 35(7): 1086

[7]

Oğuz D, Boccaccini AR, Loca D. Injectable bone cements: What benefits the combination of calcium phosphates and bioactive glasses could bring?. Bioact. Mater.. 2023, 19: 217

[8]

Ma PX. Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Mater. Today. 2004, 7(5): 30

[9]

Hench LL. The story of bioglass®. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.. 2006, 17(11): 967

[10]

Li W, Garmendia N, Larraya UPD, et al. . 45S5 bioactive glass-based scaffolds coated with cellulose nanowhiskers for bone tissue engineering. RSC Adv.. 2014, 4(99): 56156

[11]

Y.D. Cho, Y.J. Seol, Y.M. Lee, I.C. Rhyu, H.M. Ryoo, and Y. Ku, An overview of biomaterials in periodontology and implant dentistry, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017(2017), No. 1, art. No. 1948241.

[12]

Jones JR, Ehrenfried LM, Hench LL. Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006, 27(7): 964

[13]

Anesi A, Ferretti M, Salvatori R, et al. . In-vivo. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2023, 111(8): 1264

[14]

K.Ö. Güner, A.C. Özarslan, C. Özel, M. Kucak, L.T. Kara, and S. Yücel, Production, structural characterization and in vitro biological evaluation of a new bioactive glass with the composition of SiO2–Na2O–CaO–P2O5–B2O3–MgO–V2O5, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 177(2025), art. No. 114326.

[15]

C.K. Emir, Y.B. Elalmiş, Y.M. Şahin, E. Buluş, and S. Yücel, Fabrication and characterization of chlorhexidine gluconate loaded poly(vinyl alcohol)/45S5 nano-bioactive glass nanofibrous membrane for guided tissue regeneration applications, Biopolymers, 114(2023), No. 10, art. No. e23562.

[16]

Nogueira DMB, Rosso MPDO, Buchaim DV, Zangrando MSR, Buchaim RL. Update on the use of 45S5 bioactive glass in the treatment of bone defects in regenerative medicine. World J. Orthop.. 2024, 15(3): 204

[17]

C. Özel, C.B. Çevlik, A.C. Özarslan, C. Emir, Y.B. Elalmis, and S. Yücel, Evaluation of biocomposite putty with strontium and zinc Co-doped 45S5 bioactive glass and sodium hyaluronate, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 242(2023), No. 2, art. No. 124901.

[18]

Gestel NAPV, Hulsen DJW, Geurts J, et al. . Composition dependent mechanical behaviour of S53P4 bioactive glass putty for bone defect grafting. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.. 2017, 69: 301

[19]

R. Hasan, A. Wohlers, J. Shreffler, et al., An antibiotic-releasing bone void filling (ABVF) putty for the treatment of osteomyelitis, Materials, 13(2020), No. 22, art. No. 5080.

[20]

A.C. Özarslan, Y.B. Elalmis, and S. Yücel, Production of biosilica based bioactive glass-alginate composite putty as bone support material, and evaluation of in vitro properties; bioactivity and cytotoxicity behavior, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 561(2021), art. No. 120755.

[21]

Ö. Demir, E. Oselska, M. Bertins, A. Viksna, A.R. Boccaccini, and D. Loca, Optimizing α-tricalcium phosphate bone cement composite formulations: The critical role of bioactive glass particle size, Mater. Des., 248(2024), art. No. 113463.

[22]

Sanyo Chemicals, PEG Products [2025–03–22]. https://www.sanyo-chemical.co.jp/products/en/pdf/ES20000005A.pdf.

[23]

L. Drago, C. L. Romano, J. Lucchesi, and F. Ollila, Implantable Paste and its Use, United States Patent, US20170072098A1, 2017.

[24]

Bauer TW, Togawa D. Bone graft substitutes: Towards a more perfect union. Orthopedics. 2003, 26(9): 925

[25]

Sohrabi M, Hesaraki S, Shahrezaee M, et al. . Antioxidant flavonoid-loaded nano-bioactive glass bone paste: in vitro apatite formation and flow behavior. Nanoscale Adv.. 2024, 6(3): 1011

[26]

G.N. Machak, Ø.S. Bruland, T.N. Romanova, and A.V. Kovalev, Denosumab induction and Zoledronic acid maintenance therapy for recurrent unresectable giant cell tumour of the distal tibia: A case report with sustained tumour control after drug withdrawal, J. Bone Oncol., 45(2024), art. No. 100596.

[27]

Kendler DL, Cosman F, Stad RK, Ferrari S. Denosumab in the treatment of osteoporosis: 10 Years later: A narrative review. Adv. Ther.. 2022, 39(1): 58

[28]

Yang G, Guo ZL, Zhang XF, et al. . Novel injectable composite incorporating denosumab promotes bone regeneration via bone homeostasis regulation. Eng. Regen.. 2024, 5(4): 482

[29]

Özarslan AC, Özel C, Okumuş MD, Doğan D, Yücel S. Development, structural and rheological characterization, and in vitro evaluation of the zinc-doped 45S5 bioactive glass-Vaseline ointment for potential wound healing applications. J. Mater. Res.. 2023, 38(6): 1557

[30]

J. Tuominen, T. Lehtonen, and F. Ollila, Implantable Paste and its Use, United States Patent, US8858976, 2014.

[31]

Sotomayor ME, Várez A, Levenfeld B. Influence of powder particle size distribution on rheological properties of 316 L powder injection moulding feedstocks. Powder Technol.. 2010, 200(1–2): 30

[32]

Merkus HG. Particle Size Measurements: Fundamentals, Practice, Quality. 2009, Netherlands, Springer: 13

[33]

V.K. Dewangan, T.S.S. Kumar, M. Doble, and V.D. Varghese, Injectable macroporous naturally-derived apatite bone cement as a potential trabecular bone substitute, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater., 112(2024), No. 3, art. No. e35397.

[34]

Icyer NC, Ozmen D, Sener D, Kokyar N, Toker OS. Structural and sensory impact of various emulsifiers in cocoa hazelnut spread formulations. J. Food Sci.. 2024, 89(10): 6590

[35]

Yılmaz MT, Kutlu G, Tulukcu E, Toker OS, Sagdic O, Karaman S. Rheological characteristics of Salvia sclarea seed gum solutions at different hydration temperature levels: Application of three interval thixotropy test (3ITT). LWT Food Sci. Technol.. 2016, 71: 391

[36]

Reiner M. Ueber die Strömung einer elastischen Flüssigkeit durch eine Kapillare: Beitrag zur Theorie der Viskositätsmessungen. Kolloid Z.. 1926, 39(1): 80

[37]

Bingham E C. Fluidity and Plasticity. 1922, New York, McGraw-Hill

[38]

Herschel WH, Bulkley R. Konsistenzmessungen von gummi-benzollösungen. Kolloid Z.. 1926, 39(4): 291

[39]

Casson N. Rheology of Disperse Systems. 1959, London, Pergamon Press

[40]

Borden M, Westerlund LE, Lovric V, Walsh W. Controlling the bone regeneration properties of bioactive glass: Effect of particle shape and size. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater.. 2022, 110(4): 910

[41]

Isik S, Yucel S, Karakus YY, Ozel C, Yapici E. Immobilization of trametes versicolor laccase onto silica aerogel via covalent attachment method. Open Access J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.. 2024, 9(4): 1

[42]

Özarslan AC. Preparation of biosilica glass-based porous scaffolds using various elements (Mg–Zn, Mg–Cu, and Sr–Cu) as bioactive glass co-dopants: in vitro bioactivity and biocompatibility behaviors. J. Mater. Res.. 2023, 38(16): 3874

[43]

Özarslan AC, Özel C, Yücel S, Elalmis YB. Characterizations and solubility profile of novel senary SiO2–CaO–Na2O–P2O5–CaF2–SrO glass structure modified with Nb2O5. Ceram. Int.. 2024, 50(17): 30980

[44]

T. Matic, F. Daou, A. Cochis, et al., Multifunctional Sr, Mg-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for simultaneous bone regeneration and drug delivery, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25(2024), No. 15, art. No. 8066.

[45]

Feichtinger A, Scholten E, Sala G. Effect of particle size distribution on rheological properties of chocolate. Food Funct.. 2020, 11(11): 9547

[46]

S.V. Atre, T.J. Weaver, and R.M. German, Injection molding of metals and ceramics, SAE Tech. Pap. Ser., 1(1998), art. No. 982417.

[47]

C.D. Batista and M.T.F. Vieira, Steel chips as a raw material for MEX, Metals, 14(2024), No. 11, art. No. 1293.

[48]

Zalazar AL, Gliemmo MF, Campos CA. Data on the physical characterization of oil in water emulsions. Data Brief. 2016, 9: 96

[49]

Adi H, Larson I, Stewart P. Use of milling and wet sieving to produce narrow particle size distributions of lactose monohydrate in the sub-sieve range. Powder Technol.. 2007, 179(1–2): 95

[50]

Microtrac Retsch GmbH, Analysis of Particle Size Distribution [2025–03–23]. https://www.microtrac.com/knowledge/particle-size-distribution/

[51]

J. Santos, L.A.T. Cayado, F. Carrillo, M.L.L. Castejón, and M.C.A. Rodríguez, Relation between droplet size distributions and physical stability for zein microfluidized emulsions, Polymers, 14(2022), No. 11, art. No. 2195.

[52]

Sepulveda P, Jones JR, Hench LL. Characterization of melt-derived 45S5 and sol–gel-derived 58S bioactive glasses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.. 2001, 58(6): 734

[53]

M. Sahu, V.R.M. Reddy, B. Kim, et al., Fabrication of Cu2ZnSnS4 light absorber using a cost-effective mechanochemical method for photovoltaic applications, Materials, 15(2022), No. 5, art. No. 1708.

[54]

Marwan M, Indarti E, Darmadi D, Rinaldi W, Hamzah D, Rinaldi T. Production of triacetin by microwave assisted esterification of glycerol using activated natural zeolite. Bull. Chem. React. Eng. Catal.. 2019, 14(3): 672

[55]

L.C.S. Delgado, C.A.B. Sanabria, C.A. Suárez, and G.E.R. Caballero, Stimuli-responsive hydrogels based on polyglycerol crosslinked with citric and fatty acids, Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2018(2018), No. 1, art. No. 3267361.

[56]

B.M. Arpacay, F. Ciftci, A.C. Özarslan, M. Unal, M. Kucak, and A. Yelkenci, Resveratrol-loaded PCL-PEG/GO/HAP biocomposite bone membranes: Evaluation of mechanical properties, release kinetics, and cellular response, J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater., 23(2025), art. No. 22808000251314087.

[57]

Chieng B, Ibrahim N, Yunus W, Hussein M. Poly(lactic acid)/poly(ethylene glycol) polymer nanocomposites: Effects of graphene nanoplatelets. Polymers. 2014, 6(1): 93

[58]

M. Brogly, S. Bistac, and D. Bindel, Adsorption and structuration of PEG thin films: Influence of the substrate chemistry, Polymers, 16(2024), No. 9, art. No. 1244.

[59]

Sohrabi M, Hesaraki S, Kazemzadeh A, Alizadeh M. Development of injectable biocomposites from hyaluronic acid and bioactive glass nano-particles obtained from different solgel routes. Mater. Sci. Eng. C: Mater. Biol. Appl.. 2013, 33(7): 3730

[60]

M.K. Barron, T.J. Young, K.P. Johnston, and R.O. Williams, Investigation of processing parameters of spray freezing into liquid to prepare polyethylene glycol polymeric particles for drug delivery, AAPS PharmSciTech, 4(2003), No. 2, art. No. 12.

[61]

Ciftci F, Özarslan AC. Preparation of PLGA-PEG/hydroxyapatite composites via simple methodology of film formation and assessment of their structural, thermal, and biological features. J. Turk. Chem. Soc. Sect. A: Chem.. 2023, 10(4): 1123

[62]

Cai ZJ, Hou CW, Yang G. Crystallization behavior, thermal property and biodegradation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly(ethylene glycol) grafting copolymer. Polym. Degrad. Stab.. 2011, 96(9): 1602

[63]

Kerkhof PCMVD, ones JB, Griffiths CEM, et al. . Long-term efficacy and safety of tacalcitol ointment in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Br. J. Dermatol.. 2002, 146(3): 414

[64]

D. Ozmen, O.S. Toker, and S.A. Öztürk, Lemon fiber as a new source of fat replacement in filling creams, J. Food Process. Eng., 48(2025), No. 2, art. No. e70056.

[65]

Khecho A, Ghaffari S A, Eftekhari Yekta B. The influence of particle size distribution on rheological properties of fused silica pastes for direct ink writing. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol.. 2022, 19(55): 2472

[66]

A. Cahyani, J. Kurniasari, R. Nafingah, S. Rahayoe, E. Harmayani, and A.D. Saputro, Determining casson yield value, casson viscosity and thixotropy of molten Chocolate using viscometer, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 355(2019), No. 1, art. No. 012041.

[67]

Yu T, Ye JD, Wang YJ. Synthesis and property of a novel calcium phosphate cement. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater.. 2009, 90B(2): 745

[68]

Lewis G. Viscoelastic properties of injectable bone cements for orthopaedic applications: State-of-the-art review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater.. 2011, 98B(1): 171

[69]

Chhabra RP, Richardson JF. Non-Newtonian Flow and Applied Rheology. 2008, Oxford, Elsevier

[70]

Agudo ER, Navarro CR. Microstructure and rheology of lime putty. Langmuir. 2010, 26(6): 3868

[71]

Hanemann T, Heldele R, Hausselt J. Particle size dependent viscosity of polymer-silica-composites. 4M 2006 - Second International Conference on Multi-Material Micro Manufacture. 2006191

[72]

Liu CS, Shao HF, Chen FY, Zheng HY. Rheological properties of concentrated aqueous injectable calcium phosphate cement slurry. Biomaterials. 2006, 27(29): 5003

[73]

Mewis J, Wagner NJ. Thixotropy. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.. 2009, 147–148: 214

[74]

Willenbacher N, Georgieva K. Rheology of Disperse Systems. 2013, Weinheim, John Wiley and Sons

[75]

Doran PM. Fluid flow. Bioprocess Engineering Principles. 2013201

[76]

Wu YS. Immiscible displacement of non-Newtonian fluids. Multiphase Fluid Flow in Porous and Fractured Reservoirs. 2016, Oxford, Elsevier: 127

[77]

H.Y. Wu, X.M. Zhang, Z.G. Wang, et al., Preparation, properties and in vitro osteogensis of self-reinforcing injectable hydrogel, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 192(2024), art. No. 106617.

[78]

K. Benyounes, S. Remli, and A. Benmounah, Rheological behavior of hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) solutions, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1045(2018), No. 1, art. No. 012008.

[79]

Rodrigues DC, Gilbert JL, Hasenwinkel JM. Pseudoplasticity and setting properties of two-solution bone cement containing poly(methyl methacrylate) microspheres and nanospheres for kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater.. 2009, 91B(1): 248

[80]

Loebbecke B, Knitter R, Haußelt J. Rheological properties of alumina feedstocks for the low-pressure injection moulding process. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.. 2009, 29(9): 1595

[81]

Juan IG, Tulyaganov D U, Balan C, Linser R, Ferreira JMF, Riedel R, Ionescu E. Tailoring the viscoelastic properties of injectable biocomposites: A spectroscopic assessment of the interactions between organic carriers and bioactive glass particles. Mater. Des.. 2016, 97: 45

[82]

Zheng K, Sui BY, Ilyas K, Boccaccini AR. Porous bioactive glass micro- and nanospheres with controlled morphology: Developments, properties and emerging biomedical applications. Mater. Horiz.. 2021, 8(2): 300

[83]

Townsend JM, Beck EC, Gehrke SH, Berkland CJ, Detamore MS. Flow behavior prior to crosslinking: The need for precursor rheology for placement of hydrogels in medical applications and for 3D bioprinting. Prog. Polym. Sci.. 2019, 91: 126

[84]

F. Walha, K. Lamnawar, A. Maazouz, and M. Jaziri, Rheological, morphological and mechanical studies of sustainably sourced polymer blends based on poly(lactic acid) and polyamide 11, Polymers, 8(2016), No. 3, art. No. 61.

[85]

Pandey P, Ewing GD. Rheological characterization of petrolatum using a controlled stress rheometer. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.. 2008, 34(2): 157

[86]

Á.J. Leite, B. Sarker, T. Zehnder, R. Silva, J.F. Mano, and A.R. Boccaccini, Bioplotting of a bioactive alginate dialdehyde-gelatin composite hydrogel containing bioactive glass nanoparticles, Biofabrication, 8(2016), No. 3, art. No. 035005.

[87]

Pontremoli C, Boffito M, Fiorilli S, et al. . Hybrid injectable platforms for the in situ delivery of therapeutic ions from mesoporous glasses. Chem. Eng. J.. 2018, 340: 103

[88]

Razavieh A, Mortazavi S. The interface between fluidlike and solid-like behavior for drops suspended in two-phase Couette flow. Acta Mech.. 2015, 226(4): 1105

[89]

F. Piguet, H. Ouldali, F. Discala, et al., High temperature extends the range of size discrimination of nonionic polymers by a biological nanopore, Sci. Rep., 6(2016), art. No. 38675.

[90]

Barnes HA, Hutton JF, Walters K. An Introduction to Rheology. 1989, The Netherlands, Elsevier

[91]

Rodriguez LC, Chari J, Aghyarian S, Gindri IM, Kosmopoulos V, Rodrigues DC. Preparation and characterization of injectable brushite filled-poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cement. Materials. 2014, 7(9): 6779

[92]

Risica D, Barbetta A, Vischetti L, Cametti C, Dentini M. Rheological properties of guar and its methyl, hydroxypropyl and hydroxypropyl-methyl derivatives in semidilute and concentrated aqueous solutions. Polymer. 2010, 51(9): 1972

[93]

Rayeni HF, Forootanfar H, Khazaeli P, et al. . Evaluation of antioxidant potential of Heliotropium bacciferum Forssk extract and wound healing activity of its topical formulation in rat. Ann. Pharm. Françaises. 2022, 80(3): 280

[94]

O’Neill R, McCarthy HO, Montufar EB, et al. . Critical review: Injectability of calcium phosphate pastes and cements. Acta Biomater.. 2017, 50: 1

[95]

Caluwé TD, Vercruysse CWJ, Ladik I, et al. . Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility. Dent. Mater.. 2017, 33(4): e186

[96]

N. Edanami, R.S.I. Belal, S. Takenaka, et al., Apatite-forming ability of flowable vs. putty formulations of newly developed bioactive glass-containing endodontic cement, Appl. Sci., 11(2021), No. 19, art. No. 8969.

[97]

Chhabra RP. Non-Newtonian fluids: An introduction. Rheology of Complex Fluids. 2010, New York, Springer: 3

[98]

M.M. Germaini, S. Belhabib, S. Guessasma, R. Deterre, P. Corre, and P. Weiss, Additive manufacturing of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering–A critical review of the state of the art and new concepts, Prog. Mater. Sci., 130(2022), art. No. 100963.

[99]

S. Borhan, S. Hesaraki, A.A. Behnamghader, and E. Ghasemi, Rheological evaluations and in vitro studies of injectable bioactive glass-polycaprolactone-sodium alginate composites, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 27(2016), No. 9, art. No. 137.

[100]

A. Bestani, C. Lekbir, and A. Benmounah, Impact of calcination temperature, organic additive percentages, and testing temperature on the rheological behaviour of dried sewage sludge, Appl. Rheol., 34(2024), No. 1, art. No. 20240025.

[101]

K.X. Yang, Y.N. Wang, Y.Z. You, H.Y. Yang, and X. Hao, Non-equilibrium polymerization enables adhesive material with anti-freezing, multipurpose adhesion, long-term air stability and anisotropic deformation, Chem. Eng. J., 382(2020), art. No. 122926.

[102]

Yu JH, Wang JL, Wu X, Zhu PX. Effect of glycerol on water vapor sorption and mechanical properties of starch/clay composite films. Starch Stärke. 2008, 60(5): 257

[103]

P.R.D. Matos, D.W. Jiao, F. Roberti, F. Pelisser, and P.J.P. Gleize, Rheological and hydration behaviour of cement pastes containing porcelain polishing residue and different water-reducing admixtures, Constr. Build. Mater., 262(2020), art. No. 120850.

[104]

Z.S. Bernstein, E.B. Kim, and N. Raje, Bone disease in multiple myeloma: Biologic and clinical implications, Cells, 11(2022), No. 15, art. No. 2308.

[105]

S. Hong, H.J. Lee, D.S. Jung, et al., Exploring the anti-osteoporotic effects of n-hexane fraction from cotoneaster wilsonii nakai: Activation of runx2 and osteoblast differentiation in vivo, Pharmaceuticals, 18(2025), No. 1, art. No. 45.

[106]

Tamjid E, Bagheri R, Vossoughi M, Simchi A. Effect of particle size on the in vitro bioactivity, hydrophilicity and mechanical properties of bioactive glass-reinforced polycaprolactone composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2011, 31(7): 1526

[107]

Fontal EL, Gin S. Insights into calcium phosphate formation induced by the dissolution of 45S5 bioactive glass. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.. 2025, 11(2): 875

[108]

Ramli H, Zainal NFA, Hess M, Chan CH. Basic principle and good practices of rheology for polymers for teachers and beginners. Chem. Teach. Int.. 2022, 4(4): 307

[109]

D.A. Türker, M.G. Saraç, and M. Doğan, Influence of particle size on powder flow behaviour, textural and viscoelastic properties of milk-based whippable emulsions, Int. Dairy J., 148(2024), art. No. 105806.

[110]

Arici M, Senol BM, Ozturk E, Ozmen D, Toker OS. Effect of extraction temperature of taro mucilage on physicochemical and rheological properties. J. Food Meas. Charact.. 2024, 18(3): 1913

[111]

G. Mezreli, A. Kurt, E. Akdeniz, D. Ozmen, B. Basyigit, and O.S. Toker, A new synergistic hydrocolloid with superior rheology: Locust bean/xanthan gum binary solution powdered by different drying methods, Food Hydrocoll., 154(2024), art. No. 110078.

[112]

Yilmaz N, Bakhtiyarov AS, Ibragimov RN. Experimental investigation of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid flows in porous media. Mech. Res. Commun.. 2009, 36(5): 638

[113]

J.S. Lu, T. Umeshita, S. Sakai, et al., Potential of glycerol as a bio-based wood adhesive, J. Wood Sci., 71(2025), No. 1, art. No. 4.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

University of Science and Technology Beijing

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/