A new goal for playing global climate change game

Qian Ye; Peijun Shi

doi:10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.02.005

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2010, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 40 -43. DOI: 10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.02.005

Article

A new goal for playing global climate change game

Qian Ye ¹^,a
, Peijun Shi ¹

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

From an integrated risk governance point of view, we propose a new goal in order to solve the current dilemma in the international global climate change negotiations. We demonstrate that for global climate change issues, identifying a common interest so that all players are willing to play the game with the same rule is the key. Green economy could be that key.

Keywords

climate change / common interest / integrated risk governance / UNFCCC COP

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Qian Ye, Peijun Shi. A new goal for playing global climate change game. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2010, 1(2): 40-43 DOI:10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.02.005

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Bueno de Mesquita, B. 2009. Recipe for Failure. Foreign Policy, November/December 2009. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/10/16/recipe_for_failure.

[2]	Ernst & Young. 2010. Action amid Uncertainty: The Business Response to Climate Change. Ernst & Young’s series. http://www.ey.com/ccassexecutivesurvey

[3]	ICSU (International Council for Science) Regional Environmental Change: Human Action and Adaptation, 2010, Paris: International Council for Science

[4]	Lavania U. C., Lavania S.. Sequestration of Atmospheric Carbon into Subsoil Horizons through Deep-Rooted Grasses-Vetiver Grass Model. Current Science, 2009, 97(5): 618-19.

[5]	Mitchell D.. A Note on Rising Food Prices, 2008, Washington, DC: World Bank

[6]	Orcutt, M. 2010. Flower Power: Genetic Modification Could Amply Boost Plants’ Carbon-Capture and Bioenergy Capacity. Scientific American, October 18, 2010. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=genetic-modification-carbon-sequestration.

[7]	Shi P. J., Jaeger C., Ye Q.. Integrated Risk Governance- IHDP-IRGP Science Plan and Case Studies on the Integrated Risk Governance of Large Scale Disasters, 2011, London: Earthscan (in press)

[8]	Shi Q. Q., Shi P. J., Wang J. A.. Green Economy and Catastrophe Risk Governance. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science Section), 2010, 6: 134-41.

[9]	SPARC Project (Science Policy Assessment and Research on Climate Project). 2010. Usable Science: A Handbook for Science Policy Decision Makers. http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/sparc/outreach/sparc_handbook.

[10]	Timilsina G. R., Beghin J. C., van der Mensbrugghe D., Mevel S.. The Impacts of Biofuel Targets on Land-Use Change and Food Supply: A Global CGE Assessment, 2010, Washington, DC: World Bank

[11]	Wikipedia. 2011. Word of the Year. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_of_the_year.

[12]	WMO. 2010. A Snapshot of some Extreme Events over the Past Decade. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/wcp/documents/extremes.pdf.

[13]	Wolde-Georgis, T., and M. H. Glantz. 2009. Biofuels in Africa: A Pathway to Development? International Research Center for Energy and Economic Development. Occasional Papers: #43.

[14]	Ye Q., Usher P.. A Historical Review on the Roles of Science and Politics in Addressing Global Environmental Issues. Frontiers of Earth Science in China, 2009, 3(1): 57-63