Evaluating china’s national post-disaster plans: The 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake’s recovery and reconstruction planning

Abstract

The 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake caused tremendous casualties and property losses as well as a substantial need for rebuilding the affected localities in order to address housing and urban development issues for the future. China’s central government applied a national planning approach in both the emergency response and the disaster recovery phases that aims at facilitating the flow of technological assistance and financial aid from the whole country to the earthquake-stricken areas. This study reviews disaster management practices in China with an interdisciplinary analysis to see how disaster planning and management can be fit into the top-down government administration system. The Overall Plan for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Recovery and Reconstruction and the City/Town System Plan for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Recovery and Reconstruction, two overarching plans initiated by the central government, are evaluated by reviewing the underlying facts, goals, and actions. The plans’ merits are to be found in their incorporating hazard mitigation into disaster recovery plans and taking into account different strategies of relocation and reconstruction. The article also identifies the gap between making plans and meeting local needs, the insufficiency of public engagement in plan-making, and the negative planning impacts of competition for resources and funds. Suggestions for disaster planning and policy-making are provided with a focus on building a local disaster management system in China.

Keywords

China / national post-disaster plans / recovery and reconstruction planning / Wenchuan Earthquake

References

[1] Amendola A., Linnerooth-Bayer J., Okada N., Shi P.. Towards Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Case Studies and Trends from Asia. Natural Hazards, 2008, 44(2): 163-68

[2] Britton N. R.. Rodriguez H., Quarantelli E. L., Dynes R. R.. National Planning and Response: National Systems. Handbook of Disaster Research, 2006, New York: Springer 347-67.

[3] Brody S. D.. Are We Learning to Make Better Plans? A Longitudinal Analysis of Plan Quality Associated with Natural Hazards. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2003, 23(2): 191-201

[4] Burby R. J.. Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities, 1998, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press

[5] Chen S., Luo G.. Disaster-Affected Population Rebuilding Will and Influencing Factors in Wenchuan Earthquake. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(1): 55-60.

[6] China Academy of Urban Planning and Design. 2008. The Town System Plan for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Recovery and Reconstruction. Beijing, China. [In Chinese.]

[7] Clark W. C., Dickson N. M.. Sustainability Science: The Emerging Research Program. PNAS, 2003, 100(14): 8059-61

[8] Godschalk D. R., Beatley T., Berke P., Brower D., Kaiser E.. Natural Hazard Mitigation: Recasting Disaster Policy and Planning, 1999, Washington, DC & Covelo, CA: Island Press

[9] Kaiser E. J., Godschalk D. R., Chapin F. S.. Urban Land Use Planning, 1995 4th Edition Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press

[10] Leonard H. B., Howitt A. M.. Kunreuther H., Useem M.. Acting in Time against Disasters: A Comprehensive Risk-Management Framework. Learning from Catastrophes: Strategies for Reaction and Response, 2010, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

[11] Levin, S. A., and W. C. Clark, eds. 2010. Toward a Science of Sustainability: Report from Toward a Science of Sustainability Conference, Airlie Center, Warrenton, VA, November 29, 2009 – December 2, 2009. CID Working Paper No. 196. Center for International Development at Harvard University.

[12] Lindell M. K., Perry R. W.. Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities, 2004, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

[13] Lindell M. K., Prater C. S., Perry R. W.. Fundamentals of Emergency Management, 2006, Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency

[14] Mileti D. S.. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States, 1999, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press

[15] Planning Group of Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Recovery and Reconstruction. 2008. The Overall Planning for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Recovery and Reconstruction. Beijing, China. [In Chinese.]

[16] Quarantelli, E. L. 1999. The Disaster Recovery Process: What We Know and Do Not Know from Research. Preliminary Paper # 286, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.

[17] Schafer, W. A., J. M. Carroll, S. R. Haynes, and S. Abrams. 2008. Emergency Management Planning as Collaborative Community Work. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 5 (1), Article 10.

[18] Tang Z., Lindell M. K., Prater C., Brody S. D.. Measuring Tsunami Hazard Planning Capacity on the U.S. Pacific Coast. Natural Hazards Review, 2008, 9(2): 91-100

[19] Turner B. L., Kasperson R. E., Matson P. A., McCarthy J. J., Corell R. W., Christensen L., Eckley N., Kasperson J. X., Luers A., Martello M. L., Polsky C., Pulsipher A., Schiller A.. A Framework for Vulnerability Analysis in Sustainability Science. PNAS, 2003, 100(14): 8074-79

[20] UN-OCHA (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs). 1998. Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (UN Doc. E/CN.4/1998/53/Add.2). http://www.reliefweb.int/ocha_ol/pub/idp_gp/idp.html.

[21] Kälin, W. 2008. Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement: Annotations. Studies in Transnational Legal Policy No. 38. The American Society of International Law. Washington, DC. http://www.asil.org/pdfs/stlp.pdf.

[22] Wu J. Y., Lindell M. K.. Housing Reconstruction after Two Major Earthquakes: The 1994 Northridge Earthquake in the United States and the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake in Taiwan. Disasters, 2004, 28(1): 63-81

[23] Yin R. K.. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2003 3rd Edition Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage