Risk, rationality, and resilience

Abstract

Improving our ability to cope with large risks is one of the key challenges for humankind in this century. This article outlines a research program in this perspective. Starting with a concrete example of a relatively small disaster, it questions simplistic ideas of rationality. It then proposes a fresh look at the concepts of probability and utility in the context of socio-ecological systems. This leads first to an emphasis on the problem of equilibrium selection, and then to a distinction between three kinds of resilience that matter both for theory and practice of risk management. They can be investigated by paying attention to the transitions into and out of actual disasters.

Keywords

integrated risk governance / rationality / resilience / risk

References

[1] Aumann R.. Subjectivity and Correlation in Randomized Strategies. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1974, 1(1): 67-96

[2] Colander D., Goldberg M., Haas A., Juselius K., Kirman A., Lux T., Sloth B.. The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of Academic Economics. Critical Review, 2009, 21(2&3): 249-67

[3] Devlin K.. The Unfinished Game: Pascal, Fermat, and the 17th-Century Letter that Made the World Modern, 2008, New York: Basic Books

[4] The Economist. 2010. Death in Duisburg. http://www.economist.com/blogs/newsbook/2010/07/love_parade.

[5] Feyerabend, P. 1992. Erkenntnis ohne Theorie. Vom Nutzen der Abstraktion und vom Recht des Besonderen. Lettre International (L 16): 66–71.

[6] Flood M. M.. Some Experimental Games, 1952, Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation

[7] Gintis H.. The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences, 2009, Princeton: Princeton University Press

[8] Hawthorne J.. On the Nature of Bayesian Convergence. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1994, 1: 241-49.

[9] Helbing D., Buzna L., Johansson A., Werner T.. Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions. Transportation Science, 2005, 39(1): 1-24

[10] Integrated Risk Governance Project. 2010. IRG-Project Science Plan. Potsdam-Beijing. http://www.irg-project.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&file=fileadmin/publications/PUBLIC/ABOUT_IRGProject/ irg-project_SP_Mar10_final__wf_small.pdf&t=1282858339&hash=66b9951889b248eefd3322694520bbb7.

[11] Jaeger C., Renn O., Rosa E. A., Webler T.. Risk, Uncertainty, and Rational Action, 2001, London: Earthscan

[12] Jallais S., Pradier P.-C., Teira D.. Facts, Norms and Expected Utility Functions. History of the Human Sciences, 2008, 21(2): 45-62

[13] Kasperson R. E., Renn O., Slovic P., Brown H. S., Emel J., Goble R., Kasperson J. X., Ratick S.. The Social Amplification of Risk. A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis, 1988, 8(2): 177-87

[14] Nash J.. Equilibrium Points in n-Person Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1950, 36(1): 48-49

[15] von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 1947 2nd edition Princeton: Princeton University Press

[16] Perrow C.. Normal Accidents. Living with High-Risk Technologies, 1984, New York: Basic Books

[17] Poundstone W.. Prisoner’s Dilemma: John von Neumann, Game Theory and the Puzzle of the Bomb, 1992, New York: Doubleday

[18] Schön D.. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, 1983, London: Temple Smith

[19] Schreckenberg M., Selten R.. Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks, 2004, Berlin: Springer

[20] Shiller R. J.. The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st Century, 2003, Princeton: Princeton University Press

[21] Swinburne R.. Bayes’s Theorem, 2002, Oxford: Oxford University Press

[22] Walker, B. H., J. M. Anderies, A. P. Kinzig, P. Ryan, eds. 2006. Exploring Resilience in Socio-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 11 (1): 12.

[23] Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M.. Managing the Unexpected-Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity, 2001, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

[24] Wilkinson A.. In Search of Theory. Journal of Futures Studies, 2009, 13(3): 107-14.

[25] Wyart, M., and J.-P. Bouchaud. 2003. Self Referential Behaviour, Overreaction and Conventions in Financial Markets. http://www.cfm.fr/papers/Wyart2.pdf.

[26] Young H. P.. The Evolution of Conventions. Econometrica, 1993, 61(1): 57-84

[27] Young O. R., Berhhout F., Gallopin G. C., Janssen M. A., Ostrom E., van der Leeuw S.. The Globalization of Socio-Ecological Systems: An Agenda for Scientific Research. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3): 304-16

[28] Zha, H. 2006. Interactive Technologies and Sociotechnical Systems. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, International Society on Virtual Systems and Multimedia. October 18–20, 2006, Xi’an, China.