Managing Humanitarian Access and Information Gaps: A Deep Learning Approach with MLP and Permutation Analysis
Chong Guan , Huay Ling Tay , Qitong Zhao , Victor Kwan
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› : 1 -13.
This article introduces a comprehensive framework to explore the relationship between access constraints and information deficits in humanitarian logistics. By integrating resource dependence theory (RDT) and institutional theory (IST), we examined how barriers such as movement restrictions, violence, and the presence of mines impact resource flow and operational efficiency. Drawing on RDT and IST, we analyzed data from 150 crisis events across 93 countries, encompassing nine indicators of humanitarian access constraints and information gaps. Utilizing advanced deep learning techniques, including the multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model with permutation feature importance analysis, our findings reveal that restrictions on movement within countries, violence against personnel and facilities, and administrative obstructions are the most significant predictors of information gaps. These constraints significantly hinder humanitarian responses by disrupting resource distribution and violating institutional norms. The findings highlight the primacy of access-related barriers in undermining timely and accurate needs assessment, providing empirical support for the theoretical integration of RDT and IST. The framework offers actionable insights into crisis information dynamics and informs more targeted and resilient response strategies.
Humanitarian logistics / Access constraints / Information deficits / Resource dependence theory / Institutional theory / Multi-layer perceptron model
| [1] |
Abadi, M., P. Barham, J. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, S. Ghemawat, et al. 2016. {TensorFlow}: A system for {Large-Scale} machine learning. In Proceedings of 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 2–4 November 2016, Savammah, GA, USA. |
| [2] |
Ahatsi, E., and O.A. Olanrewaju. 2025. Enhancing humanitarian supply chain resilience: Evaluating artificial intelligence and big data analytics in two nations. Logistics 9(2): Article 64. |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Botalb, A., M. Moinuddin, U. Al-Saggaf, and S.S. Ali. 2018. Contrasting convolutional neural network (CNN) with multi-layer perceptron (MLP) for big data analysis. In Proceedings of 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced System (ICIAS), 13–14 August 2018, Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre, Malaysia. |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
Dubey, R., D.J. Bryde, Y.K. Dwivedi, G. Graham, and C. Foropon. 2022. Impact of artificial intelligence-driven big data analytics culture on agility and resilience in humanitarian supply chain: A practice-based view. International Journal of Production Economics 250: Article 108618. |
| [14] |
Dwivedi, Y.K., D.L. Hughes, C. Coombs, I. Constantiou, Y. Duan, J.S. Edwards, B. Gupta, B. Lal, et al. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management 55: Article 102211. |
| [15] |
Eppler, M.J., and D. Wittig. 2000. Conceptualizing information quality: A review of information quality frameworks from the last ten years. In Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Information Quality, 83–96. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
| [16] |
Fawcett, A.M., and S.E. Fawcett. 2013. Benchmarking the state of humanitarian aid and disaster relief: A systems design perspective and research agenda. Benchmarking: An International Journal 20(5): 661–692. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
Hevner, A.R., S.T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram. 2004. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly: 75–105. |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Izumi, T., R. Shaw, R. Djalante, M. Ishiwatari, and T. Komino. 2019. Disaster risk reduction and innovations. Progress in Disaster Science 2: Article 100033. |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
Jayawardene, V., T.J. Huggins, R. Prasanna, and B. Fakhruddin. 2021. The role of data and information quality during disaster response decision-making. Progress in Disaster Science 12: Article 100202. |
| [29] |
King, K.K., and B. Wang. 2023. Diffusion of real versus misinformation during a crisis event: A big data-driven approach. International Journal of Information Management 71: Article 102390. |
| [30] |
Kingma, D.P., and J. Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1412.6980. |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
Krogh, A., and J. Hertz. 1991. A simple weight decay can improve generalization. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2–5 December 1991, Denver, CO, USA. |
| [34] |
Kumar Tarei, P., K. Manohar Gumte, J. Patnaik, and R. Suryani Oktari. 2024. Analysing barriers to humanitarian logistics for distributing relief aid in pre- and post-disaster situations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 104: Article 104388. |
| [35] |
Leitold, R., M. Garschagen, V. Tran, and J. Revilla Diez. 2021. Flood risk reduction and climate change adaptation of manufacturing firms: Global knowledge gaps and lessons from Ho Chi Minh City. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 61: Article 102351. |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Masters, D., and C. Luschi. 2018. Revisiting small batch training for deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1804.07612. |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Molnar, C. 2020. Interpretable machine learning: A guide for making black box models explainable. Morrisville, NC: Lulu.com. |
| [44] |
Moshtari, M., and P. Gonçalves. 2012. Understanding the drivers and barriers of coordination among humanitarian organizations. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society, 20–23 April 2012, Chicago, IL, USA. |
| [45] |
Nair, V., and G.E. Hinton. 2010. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10), 21–24 June 2010, Haifa, Israel. |
| [46] |
OCHA (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs). 2021a. Global humanitarian overview. https://2021.gho.unocha.org/. Accessed 8 Jun 2026. |
| [47] |
OCHA (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs). 2021b. ACAPS’ humanitarian access dataset. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/acaps-humanitarian-access-dataset/resource/1c484ab6-bc64-48e2-8e99-d1dccfeb8392. Accessed 8 Jun 2026. |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
Onik, M.F.A., E. Fielt, and G. Gable. 2017. Complex adaptive systems theory in information systems research: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 21st Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), 16–20 July 2017, Langkawi, Malaysia. |
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
Paulus, D., G. de Vries, M. Janssen, and B. Van de Walle. 2023. Reinforcing data bias in crisis information management: The case of the Yemen humanitarian response. International Journal of Information Management 72: Article 102663. |
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
Pezzica, C., V. Cutini, and C. Bleil de Souza. 2021. Mind the gap: State of the art on decision-making related to post-disaster housing assistance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 53: Article 101975. |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
Rodrigo, C., and H. Terje. 2021. The effect of resource constraints on housing recovery simulations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 55: Article 102071. |
| [59] |
Sakurai, M., and Y. Murayama. 2019. Information technologies and disaster management – Benefits and issues. Progress in Disaster Science 2: Article 100012. |
| [60] |
Salam, M.A., and S.A. Khan. 2020. Lessons from the humanitarian disaster logistics management: A case study of the earthquake in Haiti. Benchmarking: An International Journal 27(4): 1455–1473. |
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
Stern, R.N., J. Pfeffer, and G.R. Salancik. 1979. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Contemporary Sociology 8: Article 612. |
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |