Beyond Flood Control: A Scoping Review Deciphering the Co-benefits of Nature-Based Flood Risk Reduction for Healthy Ageing in China

Abstract

Climate change and population ageing are some of the most pressing challenges of the twenty-first century, whose convergence exacerbates the vulnerability of older adults to floods. Nature-based solutions for flood risk reduction (NbS-FRR) is central to China’s “ecological civilization” vision, offering sustainable adaptation. However, empirical evidence of their ancillary health benefits for older adults remains nascent. This scoping review systematically maps the qualitative evidence on the co-benefits of NbS-FRR for healthy ageing (HA) in China, aligning with the Healthy China 2030 strategy. Following the Arksey and O’Malley framework, we systematically searched three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar) for qualitative studies (2000–2025). Of the 622 retrieved records, 13 studies were included. A narrative synthesis and Sankey diagram analysis revealed that NbS-FRR interventions, particularly Sponge City and green infrastructure, generate a cascade of co-benefits for HA. These benefits span six HA domains, including enhanced psychosocial well-being, social support, and improved mental health. Furthermore, they contribute to increased physical activity, better environmental quality for independent living, supported cognitive functioning, and greater economic and community participation. The study findings demonstrate a critical synergy between NbS-FRR and HA, positioning NbS as foundational infrastructure for resilient and age-friendly communities. However, the evidence base is predominantly urban, reliant on perceived benefits, and lacks a gerontological focus. Future research must employ longitudinal designs and validated health metrics to quantify impact, particularly in underserved rural areas, to fully leverage NbS as a strategy for enhancing longevity and successfully ageing in a changing climate within and outside China.

Keywords

China / Co-benefits / Flood risk reduction / Healthy ageing / Nature-based solution

References

[1] Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005, 8(1): 19-32

[2] Balikuddembe JK, Binhua F, Reinhardt DJBenouar D. Healthcare challenges after disasters in lesser developed countries. Oxford research encyclopedia of natural hazard science, 2020, New York, Oxford Academic

[3] Balikuddembe JK, Zheng Y, Prisno DELIII, Stodden R. Impact of climate-induced floods and typhoons on geriatric disabling health among older Chinese and Filipinos: A cross-country systematic review. BMC Geriatrics, 2024, 24(320): Article 320

[4] Bei B, Bryand C, Gilson KM, Koh J, Gibson P, Komiti A, Jackson H, Judd F. A prospective study of the impact of floods on the mental and physical health of older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 2013, 17(8): 992-1002

[5] Bramer W, Rethlefsen M, Kleijnen J, Franco O. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 2017, 6(1): Article 245

[6] Byrne J, Lo A, Yang J. Residents’ understanding of the role of green infrastructure for climate change adaptation in Hangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 138: 132-143

[7] Chan F, Lu L, Zhu L, Balzan YM, Pezzoli A, Zhu FJ, Ruan T, Luo G, et al.. Exploring community perceptions and engagement of nature-based solutions: The case of Ningbo, a Chinese coastal sponge city. Nature-Based Solutions, 2023, 4: Article 100093

[8] Chausson A, Turner B, Seddon D, Chabaneix N, Girardin CAJ, Kapos V, Key I, Roe D, et al.. Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(11): 6134-6155

[9] Chen P, Li F, Harmer P. Healthy China 2030: Moving from blueprint to action with a new focus on public health. The Lancet Public Health, 2019, 4(9): Article e447

[10] Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: The challenges ahead. Lancet, 2009, 374: Article 9696

[11] Du J, Kong F, Du S, Li N, Li Y, Shi PShi P. Floods in China. Natural disasters in China, 2016, Heidelberg, Springer, 133-159

[12] Du S, Shen J, Fang J, Liu W, Wen J, Huang X, Chen S. Policy delivery gaps in the land-based flood risk management in China: A wider partnership is needed. Environmental Science and Policy, 2021, 116: 128-135

[13] Duan J, Wang Y, Fan C, Xia B, de Groot R. Perception of urban environmental risks and the effects of urban green infrastructures (UGIs) on human well-being in four public green spaces of Guangzhou, China. Environmental Management, 2018, 62: 500-517

[14] Dunlop T, Khojasteh D, Cohen-Shacham E, Glamore W, Haghani M, van den Bosch M, Rizzi D, Greve P, et al.. The evolution and future of research on nature-based solutions to address societal challenges. Communication Earth & Environment, 2024, 5: Article 132

[15] Ge Y, Chen S, Ma Y, Wang Y, Guo Y, Gan Q. Ecosystem services and public perception of green infrastructure from the perspective of urban parks: A case study of Luoyang City. China. Sustainability, 2024, 16: Article 7657

[16] Haq GGu D, Dupre ME. Flooding and older people. Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging, 2021, Cham, Springer, 1889-1891

[17] IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 2016. Resolution 69 on defining nature-based solutions (WCC-2016-Res-069). IUCN resolutions, recommendations and other decisions 6–10 September 2016. Gland: IUCN.

[18] Kundzewicz ZW, Su B, Wang Y, Xia J, Huang J, Jiang T. Flood risk and its reduction in China. Advances in Water Resources, 2019, 130: 37-45

[19] Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien K. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 2010, 5: Article 69

[20] Li L, Collins A, Cheshmehzangi A, Chan F. Identifying enablers and barriers to the implementation of the green infrastructure for urban flood management: A comparative analysis of the UK and China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2020, 54: Article 126770

[21] Liu J, Diamond J. China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature, 2005, 435: 1179-1186

[22] Liu H, Han Z. Earthquake resilience and public engagement: A social media perspective. Risk Analysis, 2025, 45(9): 2667-2684

[23] Liu S, Chan F, Chen W, Netusil N, Feng M, Xie L, Qi Y, Xu S, Cheshmehzangi A. Home-buying decisions influenced by the implementation of nature-based solutions: The case of Sponge City, Guiyang SW China. Nature-Based Solutions, 2024, 5: Article 100115

[24] Lu C, Tanaka K, Shen Q. Residents’ preferences on green infrastructure in Wuhan. China. Sustainability, 2024, 16: Article 10303

[25] Ministry of Ecology and Environment. Vision of ecological civilization provides solutions for global crises, 2021, Beijing, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, The People’s Replic of China

[26] Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018, 18(1): Article 143

[27] Peters M, Godfrey C, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares C. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 2015, 13(3): 141-146

[28] Prina M, Khan N, Akhter Khan S, Caicedo JC, Peycheva A, Seo V, Xue S. Climate change and healthy ageing: An assessment of the impact of climate hazards on older people. Journal of Global Health, 2024, 14: Article 04101

[29] Qi Y, Shun Chan F, Griffiths J, Feng M, Sang Y, O’Donnell E, Hutchins M, Thadani D, et al.. Sponge City Program (SCP) and urban flood management (UFM)—The case of Guiyang, SW China. Water, 2021, 13: Article 2784

[30] Qiao X, Liao K, Randrup T. Sustainable stormwater management: A qualitative case study of the Sponge Cities initiative in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 53: Article 101963

[31] Schmidt M. The Sankey diagram in energy and material flow management: Part I: History. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008, 12(1): 82-94

[32] Tricco A, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters M, Horsley T, et al.. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2018, 169(7): 467-473

[33] Tu WJ, Zeng X, Liu Q. Aging tsunami coming: The main finding from China’s seventh national population census. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2022, 34(5): 1159-1163

[34] Wang H, Chen H. Aging in China: Challenges and opportunities. China CDC Weekly, 2022, 4(27): 601-602

[35] Wang R, Wu H, Chiles R. Ecosystem benefits provision of green stormwater infrastructure in Chinese Sponge Cities. Environmental Management, 2022, 69: 558-575

[36] WHO (World Health Organization). World report on ageing and health, 2015, Geneva, WHO

[37] WHO (World health Organization). Decade of Healthy Ageing 2020–2030, 2017, Geneva, WHO

[38] WHO (World Health Organization) and IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). Highlights brief on WHO-IUCN report on designing nature-based solutions for human health 2023, 2023, Geneva, WHO

[39] Yu Y, Xu H, Wang X, Wen J, Du S, Zhang M, Ke Q. Residents’ willingness to participate in green infrastructure: Spatial differences and influence factors in Shanghai. China. Sustainability, 2019, 11: Article 5396

[40] Zheng S, Tang Y, Chan F, Cao L, Song R. The demographic implication for promoting Sponge City initiatives in the Chinese megacities: A case of Wuhan. Water, 2022, 14: Article 883

[41] Zyoud AH. Revealing global trends on nature-based solutions: Mapping and visualizing research landscapes. Nature-Based Solutions, 2025, 7: Article 100229

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.