Exploring the Linkages between Quality of Life, Risk Perception, and Preparedness Behavior: Comparative Insights from Taiwan, China and Kinki, Japan

Abstract

Previous studies have found that the higher the level of quality of life (QoL) or well-being is, the more desirable behavior people may take, including disaster preparedness actions. However, other variables like socio-demographics and risk perception might have varying effects on both of them. Therefore, comparisons between socio-demographic groups might be of help to disentangle this complex mechanism, but no studies have investigated their relationships. This study revisited surveys in Taiwan, China and Kinki, Japan and took a simple QoL measurement as an indicator of well-being. Multi-group analysis provided the analysis of the relationships between QoL, trust in government, disaster experience (EX), disaster risk perception (RP), and preparedness behavior (PB) for each dataset and for each grouping, here, by gender and by marital status. As a result, among others, the effect of QoL on PB was only significant in the female group in Taiwan, while RP and EX differently affected PB in different gender groups in Kinki. Moreover, no significant differences were found between the marital status groups in the associations between QoL, RP, and PB in Taiwan. These results imply the importance of group-specific approaches in intervention measures. Considering and addressing the limitations of this study, such as a cross-sectional design and the omission of potential variables, future studies may further explore the associations in different groups or with new variables such as self-efficacy.

Keywords

Multi-group analysis / Preparedness behavior / Quality of life / Risk perception / Socio-demographics

References

[1] Agrawal J, Murthy P, Philip M, Mehrotra S, Thennarasu K, John JP, Girish N, Thippeswamy V, Isaac M. Socio-demographic correlates of subjective well-being in urban India. Social Indicators Research, 2011, 101(3): 419-434

[2] Ashida R, Tzioutzios D, Cruz AM. An online survey on subjective well-being, disaster risk perception, disaster preparedness actions in the Kinki region, Japan in December 2021. Mendeley Data, 2024

[3] Ashida R, Tzioutzios D, Cruz AM. The impact of subjective well-being on risk perception and disaster preparedness actions: A survey of the Kinki region, Japan, through structural equation modelling. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, 110: Article 104595

[4] Boholm A. Comparative studies of risk perception: A review of twenty years of research. Journal of Risk Research, 1998, 1(2): 135-163

[5] Bronfman NC, Cisternas PC, Repetto PB, Castanñeda JV. Natural disaster preparedness in a multi-hazard environment: Characterizing the sociodemographic profile of those better (worse) prepared. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14(41-18

[6] Calvo R, Arcaya M, Baum CF, Lowe SR, Waters MC. Happily ever after? Pre-and-post disaster determinants of happiness among survivors of Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2015, 16(2): 427-442

[7] Cisternas PC, Cifuentes LA, Bronfman NC, Repetto PB. The influence of risk awareness and government trust on risk perception and preparedness for natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 2024, 44(2): 333-348

[8] Cui K, Han Z. Association between disaster experience and quality of life: The mediating role of disaster risk perception. Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28(2): 509-513

[9] Cvetkovic VM, Roder G, Ocal A, Tarolli P, Dragicevic S. The role of gender in preparedness and response behaviors towards flood risk in Serbia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(12): Article 2761

[10] Fujii M, Kanbara S. Analysis of gender differences in disaster preparedness for Nankai trough earthquake. Health Science Journal, 2019, 13(2Article 644

[11] Gowan ME, Kirk RC, Sloan JA. Building resiliency: A cross-sectional study examining relationships among health-related quality of life, well-being, and disaster preparedness. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2014, 12(1Article 85

[12] Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Danks NP, Ray S. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R, 2021, Cham, Springer International Publishing

[13] Han K, Park E, Kim J, Kim SJ, Park S. Is marital status associated with quality of life?. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2014, 12(1Article 109

[14] Head ML, Holman L, Lanfear R, Kahn AT, Jennions MD. The extent and consequences of P-hacking in science. PLOS Biology, 2015, 13(31-15

[15] Hoffmann R, Muttarak R. Learn from the past, prepare for the future: Impacts of education and experience on disaster preparedness in the Philippines and Thailand. World Development, 2017, 96: 32-51

[16] Hofstede G. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2011, 2(1): Article 8

[17] Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M. Culture and organizations: Software of the mind, 20103New York, McGraw-Hill Education

[18] Hong Y, Kim J-S, Lee J-H. How does the quality of life affect individuals’ disaster preparedness behaviors? A moderated mediation model-based case study. Social Indicators Research, 2020, 148(31039-1052

[19] Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999, 6(1): 1-55

[20] Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica. 2013. Taiwan social change survey, sixth round, fourth year (2013). https://www2.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/en/download.php?fn=tscs131.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2025.

[21] Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 20164New York, Guilford Press

[22] Kung Y-W, Chen S-H. Perception of earthquake risk in Taiwan: Effects of gender and past earthquake experience. Risk Analysis, 2012, 32(9): 1535-1546

[23] Lee S, McClain C, Webster N, Han S. Question order sensitivity of subjective well-being measures: Focus on life satisfaction, self-rated health, and subjective life expectancy in survey instruments. Quality of Life Research, 2016, 25(10): 2497-2510

[24] Lo T-Y, Sun I, Wu Y, Chang K-M, Hong J-W. Correlates of public compliance with COVID-19 regulations in Taiwan. Policing: An International Journal, 2025, 48(1): 33-52

[25] Lyubomirsky S, Lepper HS. A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 1999, 46(2): 137-155

[26] Maciel NM, De Conti MHS, Simeão SFAP, Genebra CVdS, Corrente JE, De Vitta A. Sociodemographic factors, level of physical activity and health-related quality of life in adults from the north-east of São Paulo, Brazil: A cross-sectional population study. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(1): 1-11

[27] Mercier C, Péladeau N, Tempier R. Age, gender and quality of life. Community Mental Health Journal, 1998, 34(5): 487-500

[28] Miceli R, Sotgiu I, Settanni M. Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: A study in an alpine valley in Italy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2008, 28(2): 164-173

[29] Mizrahi S, Cohen N, Vigoda-Gadot E, Krup DN. Compliance with government policies during emergencies: Trust, participation and protective actions. Governance, 2023, 36(4): 1083-1102

[30] Mulilis J-P. Gender and earthquake preparedness. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 1999, 14(1): 41-50

[31] Oishi S, Kimura R, Hayashi H, Tatsuki S, Tamura K, Ishii K, Tucker J. Psychological adaptation to the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake of 1995: 16 years later victims still report lower levels of subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 2015, 55: 84-90

[32] Paton D, Bajek R, Okada N, Mcivor D. Predicting community earthquake preparedness: A cross-cultural comparison of Japan and New Zealand. Natural Hazards, 2010, 54(3): 765-781

[33] Peric J, Cvetkovic VM. Demographic, socio-economic and phychological perspective of risk perception from disasters caused by floods: Case study Belgrade. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2019, 1(2): 31-45

[34] Putnick DL, Bornstein MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 2016, 41: 71-90

[35] Quinn T, Adger WN, Butler C, Walker-Springett K. Community resilience and well-being: An exploration of relationality and belonging after disasters. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2021, 111(2): 577-590

[36] Rimal RN, Real K. Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: Use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors. Human Communication Research, 2003, 29(3): 370-399

[37] Serinolli MI, Novaretti MCZ. A cross-sectional study of sociodemographic factors and their influence on quality of life in medical students at São Paulo, Brazil. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12(7): 1-13

[38] Shigemura J, Terayama T, Kurosawa M, Kobayashi Y, Toda H, Nagamine M, Yoshino A. Mental health consequences for survivors of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster: A systematic review. Part 1: psychological consequences. CNS Spectrums, 2021, 26(1): 14-29

[39] Snel KAW, Witte PA, Hartmann T, Geertman SCM. More than a one-size-fits-all approach—Tailoring flood risk communication to plural residents’ perspectives. Water International, 2019, 44(5): 554-570

[40] Statistical Bureau. 2020. The 2020 population and housing census chapter 2 statistical abstract analysis. https://ws.dgbas.gov.tw/001/Upload/464/relfile/11716/231359/ddf056e3-20c7-4ec8-8548-50e5e242b14c.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2025.

[41] Statistics Bureau of Japan. 2021. Census in 2020, population census 02-3. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/stat-search/file-download?statInfId=000032142406&fileKind=0. Accessed 31 Mar 2025 (in Japanese).

[42] Sun Y, Han Z. Climate change risk perception in Taiwan: Correlation with individual and societal factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(1): Article 91

[43] Szende A, Janssen MF, Cabases J, Ramos-Goni JM, Burström K. Socio-demographic indicators of self-reported health based on EQ-5D-3L: A cross-country analysis of population surveys from 18 countries. Frontiers in Public Health, 2023, 10: Article 959252

[44] Terpstra, T. 2010. Flood preparedness: Thoughts, feelings and intentions of the Dutch public. Ph.D. thesis. University of Twente, the Netherlands.

[45] Tzioutzios D, Kim J-N, Cruz AM. Appetite for Natech risk information in Japan: Understanding citizens’ communicative behavior towards risk information disclosure around Osaka Bay. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(3372-390

[46] Tzioutzios D, Song S, Bean H, Chabay I, Cruz AM. Serious gaming for Natech risk awareness: Introducing EGNARIA. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, 115: Article 105080

[47] Uchida Y, Norasakkunkit V, Kitayama S. Cultural constructions of happiness: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2004, 5(3223-239

[48] Vera-Villarroel P, Celis-Atenas K, Pavez P, Lillo S, Bello Robles F-A, Díaz N, López-López W. Money, age and happiness: Association of subjective wellbeing with socio-demographic variables. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 2012, 44: 155-163

[49] Wachinger G, Keilholz P, O’Brian C. The difficult path from perception to precautionary action—Participatory modeling as a practical tool to overcome the risk perception paradox in flood preparedness. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018, 9(4472-485

[50] Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C. The risk perception paradox—Implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 2013, 33(6): 1049-1065

[51] Werner, C., and K. Schermelleh-Engel. 2010. Deciding between competing models: Chi-square difference tests. https://www.psychologie.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:ffffffff-b371-2797-0000-00000fda8f29/chisquare_diff_en.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2025.

[52] Yildiz A, Dickinson J, Priego-Hernandez J, Teeuw J. Children’s disaster knowledge, risk perceptions, and preparedness: A cross-country comparison in Nepal and Turkey. Risk Analysis, 2022, 43(4): 747-761

[53] Zamboni LM, Martin EG. Association of US households’ disaster preparedness with socioeconomic characteristics, composition, and region. JAMA Network Open, 2020, 3(4): e206881-e206881

[54] Zhao X, Lynch JG, Chen Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 2010, 37(2): 197-206

Funding

NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology (incl St. Olavs Hospital - Trondheim University Hospital)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.