Rapid Assessment of Severely Affected Earthquake Areas Using Mobile Signaling Data and a Random Forest Approach

Abstract

The rapid and accurate assessment of severely affected areas following an earthquake is essential for effective emergency rescue. Mobile signaling data, with their strong responsiveness to earthquake impacts, represent a valuable tool for swiftly identifying these areas. This study employed comparative analysis, spatial interpolation, and random forest regression to develop an approach for the rapid assessment of severely affected areas using multiple mobile signaling indicators and multi-temporal analysis. Considering the 2023 Jishishan Ms 6.2 earthquake as an example, this study examined the spatiotemporal dynamics of mobile signaling variations before and after the earthquake. Then the severely affected areas of Jishishan earthquake were identified using the proposed assessment method, with results cross-validated against observed earthquake damage to confirm the method’s reliability. The findings revealed substantial anomalies in mobile signaling data post-earthquake, with varying degrees of responsiveness observed across different seismic intensity zones and indicators. These anomalies were strongly correlated with the actual extent of damage in the affected regions. Additionally, random forest regression was applied to develop seismic intensity evaluation models using mobile signaling data and epicentral distances, further refining the identification of severely impacted zones. In conclusion, the earthquake impact assessment approach using mobile signaling data represents a promising method for the swift and precise identification of severely affected areas. This approach offers a crucial support for post-earthquake emergency response, enhancing both the efficiency and effectiveness of disaster relief efforts.

Keywords

Earthquakes / Jishishan earthquake / Mobile signaling / Rapid assessment / Severely affected areas

References

[1] Bai XF, Dai YQ, Zhao H. Study on the emergency evaluation of earthquake influence fields. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2014, 23(4): 91-102(in Chinese)

[2] Balistrocchi M, Metulini R, Carpita M, Ranzi R. Dynamic maps of human exposure to floods based on mobile phone data. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2020, 20(12): 3485-3500.

[3] Dai, K.X., C.X. Cheng, S. Shen, K. Su, X.M. Zheng, and T. Zhang. 2022. Postearthquake situational awareness based on mobile phone signaling data: An example from the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 69: Article 102736.

[4] Gao M. Viewing earthquake safety in western rural areas from the perspective of the 6.2 magnitude earthquake in Jishishan. Overview of Disaster Prevention No., 2024, 1: 4-9(in Chinese)

[5] Guo, X.X., B.Y. Wei, G.Z. Nie, G.W. Su, W.H. Qi, and T.F. Zhang. 2022. Application of mobile signaling data in determining the seismic influence field: A case study of the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(17): Article 10697.

[6] Guo, X.X., B.Y. Wei, G.Z. Nie, G.W. Su, W.H. Qi, and T.F. Zhang. 2023. Determination of most affected areas by earthquakes based on mobile signaling data: A case study of the 2022 Mw 6.6 Luding earthquake, China. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 14(1): Article 2221772.

[7] Han, G., D. Dai, Y. Li, N. Xi, and L. Sun. 2024. Rapid report of the December 18, 2023 MS 6.2 Jishishan earthquake, Gansu, China. Earthquake Research Advances 4(2): Article 100287 (in Chinese).

[8] He Y, Li X, Zhou Z. Study on the synchronisation strategy for survey data of earthquake situation. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction, 2022, 38(1): 60-66(in Chinese)

[9] Hu JJ, Zhang H, Zhu JB, Liu GH. Characteristics of strong ground motion attenuation in the 2019 M_w 5.8 Changning earthquake, Sichuan. China. Journal of Seismology, 2021, 25: 949-965.

[10] Li JX, Chang XD, Zhao S, Li YF, Guo Y. Rapid assessment of seismic intensity from remote sensing images in the extreme earthquake disaster area of Taxkorgan Tajik Autonomous County. Xinjiang. Earthquake Research in China, 2018, 34(3): 513-524(in Chinese)

[11] Li L, Li SY, Ji ZH, Ma S, Yang Y. Study of the computational method of instrumental seismic intensity. Prevention, 2018, 13(4): 801-809(in Chinese)

[12] Li DP, Tan QQ, Yin JF, Jian YB. Analysis on the impact of Taiwan far-field earthquakes on the disaster avoidance behavior of people in high-rise buildings in large cities in southeast China. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2022, 13(1): 2006-2023.

[13] Lu YX, Wang L, Wei L, Liu K, Che GF, Li SH. Study on relative variability of ground motion in Min-Zhang region by using representative site parameters. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2018, 38(2): 359-366(in Chinese)

[14] Nie GZ, An JW, Deng Y. Advances in earthquake emergency disaster services. Seismology and Geology, 2012, 34: 782-791(in Chinese)

[15] Pang XK, Nie GZ, Zhang X, Li HY, Xia CX, Fan XW, Wei BY. Selection of earthquake disaster index based on mobile phone position data. Earthquake Research in China, 2019, 35(1): 144-157(in Chinese)

[16] Shuai XH, Feng W, Dong X, Liu Q, Zhen M, Li JG. Rapid identification method of earthquake intensity influence field in divided-period after earthquake. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2020, 45(8): 1195-1204(in Chinese)

[17] Sun J, Shuai XH. Study on moderate-strong seismic intensity attenuation relations in Sichuan-Yunnan and adjacent areas. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2011, 31(1): 11-18

[18] Wang XQ, Dou AX, Wang L, Yuan XX, Ding X, Zhang W. RS-based assessment of seismic intensity of the 2013 Lushan, Sichuan, China MS7.0 earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(1): 163-171(in Chinese)

[19] Wang SP, Lu YX, Shi YC, Liu B, Li T, He HL. Application of ground motion attenuation model in rapid evaluation of influence field of the Maduo Mw7.3 earthquake. World Earthquake Engineering No., 2022, 3: 192-202(in Chinese)

[20] Wang YS, Zhao B, Ji F, Li WL. Preliminary insights into the hazards triggered by the 2023 Jishishan Ms 6.2 earthquake in Gansu Province. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2024, 51(1): 1-8(in Chinese)

[21] Wei BY, Nie GZ, Su GW, Sun L, Bai XF, Qi WH. Risk assessment of people trapped in earthquake based on km grid: A case study of the 2014 Ludian earthquake, China. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2017, 8(2): 1289-1305.

[22] Wei BY, Su GW, Liu FG. Dynamic assessment of spatiotemporal population distribution based on mobile phone data: A case study in Xining City, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(4): 649-665.

[23] Wilson R, Zu Erbach-Schoenberg E, Albert M, Power D, Tudge S, Gonzalez M, Guthrie S, Chamberlain H, et al. . Rapid and near real-time assessments of population displacement using mobile phone data following disasters: The 2015 Nepal earthquake. PLOS Currents Disasters, 2016

[24] Xia CX, Nie GZ, Pang XK, Fan XW, Zhou JX, Li HY. Research on the application of phone location data in the rapid delimitation of the meizoseismal area. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2019, 109(6): 2470-2490.

[25] Xing, Z.Y., X.H. Su, J.M. Liu, W. Su, and X.D. Zhang. 2019. Spatiotemporal change analysis of earthquake emergency information based on microblog data: A case study of the “8.8” Jiuzhaigou earthquake. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8: Article 359.

[26] Yabe, T., N. Jones, P. Rao, M. Gonzalez, and S. Ukkusuri. 2022. Mobile phone location data for disasters: A review from natural hazards and epidemics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 94: Article 101777.

[27] Yabe, T., Y. Sekimoto, K. Tsubouchi, and S. Ikemoto. 2019. Cross-comparative analysis of evacuation behavior after earthquakes using mobile phone data. PLoS ONE 14(2): Article e0211375.

[28] Yu J, He SF, Lu YK, Pang WD, Luo WD, Zhong YS. Analysis of the influence field of the instrumental seismic intensity of the 2021 Yangbi, Yunnan MS 6.4 earthquake based on spatial interpolation method. Journal of Seismological Research, 2021, 44(3): 414-421(in Chinese)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)