Time-Series Flood Risk Assessment Based on Time Information Loss Compensation: Fusing Remote Sensing and Social Media Data
Zhenjie Liu , Jun Li , Lizhe Wang , Antonio Plaza
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 1044 -1056.
Time-Series Flood Risk Assessment Based on Time Information Loss Compensation: Fusing Remote Sensing and Social Media Data
The fusion of remote sensing and social media data has shown great potential in urban flood risk assessment. However, most related studies seldom consider the loss of time information and leverage social media data gathered throughout the disaster period for spatial information enhancement. Meanwhile, existing models for correcting the spatial bias between remote sensing and social media data rely on prior flood information, which is generally unavailable in countries and regions lacking urban flood monitoring infrastructure. In this study, we first combined spatiotemporal fusion of remote sensing data and feature extraction to obtain the flood prior distribution, which was used to extend the geographic optimal transport (GOT) model for scenarios with limited prior information. We then developed a morphology-based spatiotemporal enhancement method to fuse remote sensing features-derived information and relocated social media data for time-series flood risk assessment. Taking the 2016 Wuhan flood event as a case, our study showed that the precision of the relocated Weibo data reaches 82.41%, which greatly reduces the location uncertainty of the original data. In addition, the relocated Weibo data can help identify the flooded areas that may be ignored by remote sensing-based results and significantly increase the estimated flooding probability of ground-truthing derived flooded points at a local scale. Furthermore, the time-series flood risk maps at a 2-day interval exhibit good consistency with the real flooding situation. Overall, the proposed method shows potential to compensate for the loss of time information and realize time-series flood risk assessment based on data fusion.
Data fusion / Morphology / Remote sensing / Social media / Spatiotemporal enhancement / Urban flood risks
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Ajjur, S.B., and S.G. Al-Ghamdi. 2022. Exploring urban growth–climate change–flood risk nexus in fast growing cities. Scientific Reports 12(1): Article 12265. |
| [3] |
Amitrano, D., G. Di Martino, A. Di Simone, and P. Imperatore. 2024. Flood detection with SAR: A review of techniques and datasets. Remote Sensing 16(4): Article 656. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
Ding, L., L. Ma, L. Li, C. Liu, N. Li, Z. Yang, Y. Yao, and H. Lu. 2021. A survey of remote sensing and geographic information system applications for flash floods. Remote Sensing 13(9): Article 1818. |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Fan, C., M. Esparza, J. Dargin, F. Wu, B. Oztekin, and A. Mostafavi. 2020. Spatial biases in crowdsourced data: Social media content attention concentrates on populous areas in disasters. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 83: Article 101514. |
| [11] |
Farhadi, H., and M. Najafzadeh. 2021. Flood risk mapping by remote sensing data and random forest technique. Water 13(21): Article 3115. |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
Guo, K., M. Guan, and H. Yan. 2023. Utilising social media data to evaluate urban flood impact in data scarce cities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 93: Article 103780. |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Helmrich, A.M., B.L. Ruddell, K. Bessem, M.V. Chester, N. Chohan, E. Doerry, J. Eppinger, M. Garcia, et al. 2021. Opportunities for crowdsourcing in urban flood monitoring. Environmental Modelling & Software 143: Article 105124. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
Hultquist, C., and G. Cervone. 2020. Integration of crowdsourced images, USGS networks, remote sensing, and a model to assess flood depth during hurricane florence. Remote Sensing 12(5): Article 834. |
| [20] |
Jiang, R., H. Lu, K. Yang, D. Chen, J. Zhou, D. Yamazaki, M. Pan, W. Li, et al. 2023. Substantial increase in future fluvial flood risk projected in China’s major urban agglomerations. Communications Earth and Environment 4(1): Article 389. |
| [21] |
Karmegam, D., S. Ramamoorthy, and B. Mappillairaju. 2021. Near real time flood inundation mapping using social media data as an information source: A case study of 2015 Chennai flood. Geoenvironmental Disasters 8(1): Article 25. |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
Lang, F., Y. Zhu, J. Zhao, X. Hu, H. Shi, N. Zheng, and J. Zha. 2024. Flood mapping of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery based on semi-automatic thresholding and change detection. Remote Sensing 16(15): Article 2763. |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Li, H., Y. Han, X. Wang, and Z. Li. 2024. Risk perception and resilience assessment of flood disasters based on social media big data. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 101: Article 104249. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Liu, Z., J. Li, J. Plaza, and A. Plaza. 2020. Spatial bias correction of social media data by exploiting remote sensing knowledge in data-deficient regions. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 26 September–02 October 2020, Waikoloa, 7017–7020. |
| [31] |
Liu, X., S. Yang, T. Ye, R. An, and C. Chen. 2021. A new approach to estimating flood-affected populations by combining mobility patterns with multi-source data: A case study of Wuhan, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 55: Article 102106. |
| [32] |
Liu, Z., J. Li, L. Wang, and A. Plaza. 2024a. Optimal transport under land cover information constraints: Fusing heterogeneous SAR imagery and social media data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 62: Article 5228512. |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
Mojaddadi, H., B. Pradhan, H. Nampak, N. Ahmad, and A.H.b. Ghazali. 2017. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 8(2): 1080–1102. |
| [36] |
Munawar, H.S., A.W. Hammad, and S.T. Waller. 2022. Remote sensing methods for flood prediction: A review. Sensors 22(3): Article 960. |
| [37] |
Notti, D., D. Giordan, F. Caló, A. Pepe, F. Zucca, and J.P. Galve. 2018. Potential and limitations of open satellite data for flood mapping. Remote Sensing 10(11): Article 1673. |
| [38] |
Ohki, M., K. Yamamoto, T. Tadono, and K. Yoshimura. 2020. Automated processing for flood area detection using ALOS-2 and hydrodynamic simulation data. Remote Sensing 12(17): Article 2709. |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Sadiq, R., Z. Akhtar, M. Imran, and F. Ofli. 2022. Integrating remote sensing and social sensing for flood mapping. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 25: Article 100697. |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
Songchon, C., G. Wright, and L. Beevers. 2021. Quality assessment of crowdsourced social media data for urban flood management. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 90: Article 101690. |
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
Titouan, V., N. Courty, R. Tavenard, and R. Flamary. 2019. Optimal transport for structured data with application on graphs. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, 9–15 June 2019, Long Beach, USA. PMLR 97: 6275–6284. |
| [46] |
Tupas, M.E., F. Roth, B. Bauer-Marschallinger, and W. Wagner. 2023. An intercomparison of Sentinel-1 based change detection algorithms for flood mapping. Remote Sensing 15(5): Article 1200. |
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
Wang, X., J. Xia, M. Zhou, S. Deng, and Q. Li. 2022. Assessment of the joint impact of rainfall and river water level on urban flooding in Wuhan City, China. Journal of Hydrology 613: Article 128419. |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |